|

The Whiteboard Jungle
The Whiteboard Jungle is the place for conversation and discussion for education, at all levels and in all disciplines, with regard to technology. Its particular focus is on technology in the classroom, including what types of products work well, which ones are cost prohibitive, technology policies in education, and issues that technology creates in the academic world. The Whiteboard Jungle also functions as a place where those in the classroom and those in the field can exchange ideas on how to best serve students by assessing needs and delivering technology-rich instruction.
Entries typically run on Wednesdays, with the occasional exception of some series which will fall two or three days in a row.
|
Posted November 04, 2009 6:01 AM
by ShakespeareTheEngineer
|
Here's what amazes me the most about texting. As with the Internet,
we've gained the ability to communicate with people from all around the world, but
often at the expense of those in our immediate proximity.
I regularly chat with more people from CR4 than I do with people in my own neighborhood,
and certainly know more screen names than I do my neighbors' names. While note-passing
in school at least allowed some level of community-building (even if, arguably,
in a subversive way), students are now so enamored with those they text that they
miss opportunities to get to know their classmates. This lack of familiarity
has, in my experience, led to intolerance, bullying, and violence.
Sadly, that's not where the problems stop. Last year, there
were two car accidents on my school's campus that were the direct result of texting.
Fortunately, both were low-speed incidents in the parking lot that resulted in
only minor property damage and no major injuries. But I think this further
proves the point of how addicted some people, and teens in particular, have
become if risk of personal injury and injury to others isn't a deterrent.
For its part, the United States Congress may pass laws that
ban texting while driving. Some states are making accidents caused by texting
felony-level crimes if personal injury results. There is one case in California, for example,
where a man faces vehicular manslaughter charges for killing a pedestrian while
texting. But if a teen can text in a classroom and not get caught, how easily
will a police officer be able to spot texting in a moving car? And if students can
comfortably blow-off a teacher's authority and ignore school rules, how will police
officers and laws fare in this culture?
Entitlement Culture
Continues to Erode Society
The reality is that cell phone-based messaging is here now and
becoming ever more popular. But there's a larger story, too. This phenomenon continues
a trend (reinforced by too many adults) that those in position of authority in
the world of education are to be openly disrespected and have their authority
undercut. In such an educational environment, is it any surprise that the U.S.
is struggling to keep pace with other industrialized nations of the world?
It doesn't surprise me. And once again, it's the students
who don't care to learn that compromise the education of those that do. This is
where our society is failing! In an effort to reach the disenfranchised, the
uninterested, and the unmotivated, I cannot help but realize that those who
willingly tune-out to text cannot be allowed to consume resources and impede
the academic opportunities of those who actually want to learn.
Below the related readings, I have posted some threads that take the discussion
to whole new levels. As you'll see, all sides are heated and angry about some
of the stories presented.
Related Readings
(please note that hyperlinks will not work until future blogs
are posted):
Part 1 – The
Texting Time Bomb: A Year Later (Part 1)
Part 2 – Hell
Hath No Fury Like A Cell Phone Confiscated (Texting Time Bomb: Part 2)
Part 3 – Why
Cell Phones Make Educators Grumpy (Texting Time Bomb: Part 3)
Part 4 – From
Where I Sit – This Teacher's Take (Texting Time Bomb: Part 4)
Further
Reading/Discussion:
http://www.switched.com/2009/02/18/teen-arrested-for-texting-in-class
http://www.theultraviolet.com/March08/news0308.html
http://media.www.dailyhelmsman.com//texting.In.Class.A.Growing.Problem
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/02/texting
http://media.www.utmpacer.com/Stop-Texting.During.Class-3280690.shtml
http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2007/04/23/texting-during-class-can-b-distracting-4-u/
http://cbs5.com/technology/texting.while.driving.2.1103836.html
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/kuehl-manslaughter-prosecutors-2364107-crosswalk-driving
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32208299
|
|
|
Posted October 28, 2009 6:01 AM
by ShakespeareTheEngineer
|
There are many reasons
why student cell phone use is an issue for educators. Some reasons are
professional. Others are personal. But more often than not, educators are also angry
that texting is a problem with few solutions.
Schools can ban cell phones, but enforcing the rule is
difficult. As one teacher explained, he's not about to look in the lap of a
teenage girl wearing a borderline low-cut top to see if she's using a cell
phone. Students know this, and have learned that their waists represent a "safe
zone" for cell phone usage. As for blocking cell phone signals, it's illegal
for public schools to do in many states.
There are also ethical issues at stake. Students can
text-message questions to friends or search the Web for answers. Most texters
can take, send, and receive pictures silently, thus giving them the opportunity
to sell test questions to students with later sections of the same class.
Texters can also store test questions digitally. This becomes increasingly
serious during state-level exams, where many proctors find that patrolling for
phones is more time-consuming than any other responsibility (including
answering questions). With a cell phone stowed in a pocket, a student can use
the bathroom, get a question answered via texting or the Web, and return to the
exam undetected.
There's also an issue of respect. I haven't been totally
innocent myself during long meetings or presentations, but texting is a
statement that you don't care what your presenter is saying. So when I realized
that texting showed such disrespect, I stopped. That students exploit a teacher's
unwillingness to examine phone "safe zones" as mentioned above shows a
willingness to take advantage of the difficult situation that educators find
themselves in. One professor at Syracuse University has a solution, however. He
is so offended by texting that the first time he sees a student doing so, he
immediately ends class and leaves. It doesn't matter if there are hundreds of
students in the room. Angry phone calls from parents have not discouraged him.
It's always the job of an educator to control his or her
classroom environment, but why should teachers forfeit so much time and effort that
could be spent on instruction, enrichment, and remediation? A confiscated phone
means more than the interruption of class. It involves filling out a detailed
referral, making a phone call to the student's parents, and often consulting
with the assistant principal.
The Seeming Indignation
of Parents
The outrage doesn't stop
with teachers and students. Survey some of the forums where the topic is
discussed and you'll learn that parents are flabbergasted that their children
can have a cell phone confiscated. One parent even expressed a willingness to happily
spend money to sue the school if his or her child had any personal object
confiscated. Often, students return after a confiscation with their cell phones
back in class - and they immediately return to texting. One student, who had
her cell phone confiscated for a longer duration, just told her parents to buy
her a new phone. Amazingly, they did.
Some parents have gotten on-board by limiting their
children's text messages and outgoing calls to all but a few select numbers
during school hours. But more use the technology themselves, texting their
children during the day and placing phone calls to them while they are in
class. More than a few times, a student will raise his or her hand and ask to
be momentarily excused because a parent is calling. Gone are the days when
students are called to the main office to take a call, which, in my experience,
happened much less frequently.
This technology can be a wonderful communication tool, but
there has to be an establishment of etiquette that is both modeled and enforced
by parents. If parents show so little respect for teachers by texting and
calling students during class time, what do we really expect students to learn
by their actions?
Related Readings
(please note that hyperlinks will not work until future blogs
are posted):
Part 1 – The
Texting Time Bomb: A Year Later (Part 1)
Part 2 – Hell
Hath No Fury Like A Cell Phone Confiscated (Texting Time Bomb: Part 2)
Part 3 – Why
Cell Phones Make Educators Grumpy (Texting Time Bomb: Part 3)
Part 4 – From
Where I Sit – This Teacher's Take (Texting Time Bomb: Part 4)
Resources:
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/04/02/texting
|
|
|
Posted October 21, 2009 6:01 AM
by ShakespeareTheEngineer
|
As a teacher, I rant about "entitlement culture" all of the
time. Nothing can be more irritating than a person who feels that he or she is
owed something for nothing. This is not an unabashed swipe at teens, either.
While I tend to focus on them because they're in my sphere of influence, I see the
entitlement ideology everywhere, unfortunately.
Perhaps this is the root of the reaction. If you want a sure-fire
way to move a student from calm to explosive, ask one to hand over his or her
cell phone. Sadly, the reactions I've witnessed don't vary all that much. My
colleagues report the same predictable behavior among their own students.
Bordering and perhaps surpassing the threshold of obsession,
some students see their cell phones as much of a necessity as the air we
breathe. To deny students access to this vital resource is (at least in their
minds) akin to physical or mental abuse.
I wish I was sensationalizing this, but don't think I am. These
attitudes and behavior aren't the case for all students, of course; however,
more and more educators report that students, when asked to put phones away, pull
them back out again within minutes. Student cell phones may be furtively hidden
beneath desks, behind purses, or in the pockets of hoodie sweatshirts. One
student even threatened to attack a substitute teacher if she didn't give him
back his phone. And I work in a district that is usually tied for dead-last in
our region for frequency of violent behavior in school. This isn't exactly an
environment that encourages violence and threats.
Student Culture or
Dangerous Obsession?
I won't pretend to understand how the adolescent mind works
anymore. I am too far removed. And I admit to taking part in more than my share
of note-passing during math class. So why do today's students become so enraged
when a phone is confiscated, even if it's just for the remainder of a class? This
isn't just about personal property. Confiscating a baseball cap and releasing a
tidal wave of hat-head compressed hair may seem like a large embarrassment, but
it nets only a fraction of the outrage.
In my opinion, this aspect of student culture speaks to a
growing obsession for instant contact with friends and family that is unhealthy.
Without constant electronic stimulation, students seem to grow agitated.
They'll check their cell phones constantly to see if they've missed incoming
messages. And with the development of the Blackberry and iPhone, which allows
access to the Web, e-mail, instant messenger, and social networking sites like
MySpace and Facebook, those students who can afford them are now sitting at a desk
with a computer and tuning out the rest of the room.
Ten years ago, studies
showed that students could handle about 7 minutes of a video clip before "zoning
out". But turn on a video clip nowadays, and see how long it takes before heads
quickly look downward for cell-phone communication. Is this a scenario where a student
could, as he or she might say, "quit if I want to, but I just don't want to"?
Or has growing-up on instant access to communication and information become
such a part of the norm that being without it causes anxiety and stress? Is
there yet another addiction to be chronicled? Does it belong in DSM-V, due out in bookstores in May
2012?
Related Readings
(please note that hyperlinks will not work until future blogs
are posted):
Part 1 – The
Texting Time Bomb: A Year Later (Part 1)
Part 2 – Hell
Hath No Fury Like A Cell Phone Confiscated (Texting Time Bomb: Part 2)
Part 3 – Why
Cell Phones Make Educators Grumpy (Texting Time Bomb: Part 3)
Part 4 – From
Where I Sit – This Teacher's Take (Texting Time Bomb: Part 4)
Resources:
http://collegian.csufresno.edu/2007/04/23/texting-during-class-can-b-distracting-4-u/
http://cbs5.com/technology/texting.while.driving.2.1103836.html
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/kuehl-manslaughter-prosecutors-2364107-crosswalk-driving
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32208299
|
|
|
Posted October 14, 2009 6:01 AM
by ShakespeareTheEngineer
|
During the summer of
2008, my
first CR4 blog entries examined how text messaging was beginning to surpass
e-mail as the premier communication technology among teens and young adults. In
the year that's passed, whether it was because I was paying closer attention or
because of technological proliferation, a dramatic increase in texting is
evident everywhere. For me, this is most disconcerting in two places: the
classroom and the car.
But there's an even more disturbing trend among almost all of
the teens I come into contact with. Confiscate their phones and prepare for their
wrath! But why do they become so angry about losing their phones for an hour?
Join me in this multi-part series that will investigate the culture, trends,
and obsession with teens and texting.
By The Numbers
Last spring, my building conducted a survey to gain a better
understanding of cell phone use and text messaging during the school day.
Students, being more aware than they were given credit for, saw right through
the "fact finding" purpose of the survey. Honesty would result in tougher
restrictions. My homeroom laughed while completing this exercise. Some students
even refused to answer any of the survey's questions. They knew what would
happen if they were honest, and said so off the record.
Teachers were also given a survey. Personally, I was shocked to learn that a whopping 20% of
my fellow educators opposed a cell phone ban at the school. This suggested that
students weren't the only ones with a digital addiction. Although some students
did characterize their classmates' obsession with texting as annoying and
distracting, recent polls by Fresno State University paint a broader picture in
more concrete and measurable terms.
According to Fresno
State University,
around 70 % of respondents admitted texting during class, while 89% said that
they used their cell phones for messaging on a regular basis. More disturbing
was the MySpace poll of high school students by Dr. Tamyra Pierce, a Fresno State
associate professor of mass communication and journalism.
Dr. Pierce's study revealed that just fewer than 50% of
responding high schoolers text, and that 10% admitted to texting during exams. Furthermore, 64%
of those polled informally (just fewer than 2 out of 3) admit that texting
affects their attention span and distracts them from the material presented
during lectures. Although some students say that they use texting to stay awake
in boring classes (thus allowing them to hear at least some of the material),
others who don't text claim that the constant vibrating of phones and clicking
of buttons is distracting.
Dangers Behind the
Wheel
Beyond the classroom, the hazards of texting continue to be
mind-boggling. Recently, a girl fell down a open manhole while texting as she wasn't watching the road in front of her feet. And for the average driver, texting or messaging while driving increases
the likelihood of an accident by a staggering 2300%! Furthermore, the time
spent looking at the cell phone was often long enough to take a driver's eyes
off the road long enough to travel the length of a football field.
Since teens are the most inexperienced drivers behind the
wheel and the most likely to send text messages, organizations such as The
Virginia Tech Transportation Institute are calling for bans on any cell phone
use by newly licensed drivers. But would that be enough?
Related Readings
(please note that hyperlinks will not work until future blogs
are posted):
Part 1 – The
Texting Time Bomb: A Year Later (Part 1)
Part 2 – Hell
Hath No Fury Like A Cell Phone Confiscated (Texting Time Bomb: Part 2)
Part 3 – Why
Cell Phones Make Educators Grumpy (Texting Time Bomb: Part 3)
Part 4 – From
Where I Sit – This Teacher's Take (Texting Time Bomb: Part 4)
Resources:
http://wcbstv.com/local/texting.manhole.raw.2.1081403.html
http://cbs5.com/technology/texting.while.driving.2.1103836.html
http://www.ocregister.com/articles/kuehl-manslaughter-prosecutors-2364107-crosswalk-driving
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32208299
|
|
|
Posted October 07, 2009 6:00 AM
by ShakespeareTheEngineer
|
ePals wasn't to my
liking, so I asked my school's tech coordinator for other options. He suggested
a low-cost alternative that allowed personalization of student blogs in a
closed environment. I was interested enough to look further. This was how I
started working with 21Classes.com
Simple Design,
Moderate Cost
21Classes.com allows educators to create a blogging
environment which they control with a homepage known as a "portal". Each
student who creates an account (verified by the teacher, of course) becomes
part of the class blog.
When a student posts, a snippet of the blog displays on the
portal page for all portal members to see. Clicking on the title takes the
surfer to the author's blog and the full entry. Students can subscribe to each
other's blogs to follow their favorite student authors, and can even leave
comments and ratings of 0 to 3 stars. Comment and blog moderation is also an
option, so teachers can choose to approve any post prior to publication.
Unfortunately, 21Classes.com isn't as consumer-friendly as
it used to be. Educators could sign up for a free account and get 50 free
student accounts. That was good enough to get me through most courses that I
taught, and it allowed me to create a different account for each course. If you
needed to go above 50 accounts, then there was an $8.95 monthly fee. Bulk
pricing allowed up to 100 teacher accounts, but was somewhat pricey ($200 per/month
– granted, only $2 per teacher account). I was allowed one paid account for a course
with three sections (and 85 students), and the use of free accounts for my remaining
classes.
After the recession hit, 21Classes.com gave teachers only10
free accounts instead of 50.. This mandates that you either have multiple
accounts for each class, or move to a paid subscription. I don't blame 21Classes
for going in this direction, but the site isn't as good a bargain as it used to
be. My school paid $90 a year for my one course, and I was able to run free accounts
for four other courses. Ultimately, this limitation may force me to look to
EduBlogs for their free service while keeping my paid account with 21Classes.

EduBlogs – A Division
of WordPress
Another option is EduBlogs, which seems to have a cleaner
design than 21Classes. EduBlogs has many of the same features that WordPress
offers its regular users, but is in a controlled environment. It isn't quite as
user-friendly as 21Classes.com, but does have some advantages.
EduBlogs allows text editing, video posts, and advanced
formatting far beyond the simple style used by 21Classes. There's also a free
version of the site, although it's limited to only the most basic functions,
albeit with no limitation on student accounts.
There is a complex upgrade package that allows educators to
dial their way up from free usage to using the site for a small fee that
decreases based on length of sign-up. The upgrade costs $6.95 on a
month-to-month basis, or $3.33 per month with a 12-month term. There is also an
offering called EduBlog Campus which, while pricey, allows a district to offer
it to an increasing number of teachers. The smallest plan, which offers all the
bells and whistles of the upgraded package for up to 100 teacher accounts,
comes with a $900/year price tag. If a school district has 100 teachers looking
to use a common blog experience (allowing students to have a common platform –
once they learn how to post, they know it for all classes), EduBlog Campus is a
bargain. For larger districts, unlimited teacher account packages with all
sorts of support enhancements will set the district back $6500/year. Keep in
mind, however, that this seems to be the Cadillac Escalade of teacher blogs.

In conclusion, my best advice is to start free and figure
out what your needs are. From there, you can pick which platform best fits your
style and approach. Be sure to use your tech coordinator, too. And use your
colleagues as resources. There is no sense trying something that several other
people have found difficult to use or that students have struggled with in the
past.
Related Readings
(please note that hyperlinks will not work until future blogs
are posted):
Part 1 – Student
Blogging Communities - Blogging About Blogging? (Part 1)
Part 2 – Student
Blogging Communities - Free Opportunities Are Out There (Part 2)
Part
3 – Student
Blogging Communities - Pay to Play (Part 3)
Resources:
http://21publishblog.21publish.com/
http://edublogs.org/campus/
http://edublogs.org/campus/licences/
http://pmody.edublogs.org/
|
|
|
Show all Blog Entries in this Blog
|
|
|
Search this Blog
|
|
|
The Whiteboard Jungle:
|
|
|
|
|
|