|

Coatings & Surface Engineering
The Coatings & Surface Engineering is the place for conversation and discussion about coatings; substrate modifications; cleaning and surface preparation; and friction, lubrication and wear. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.
|
Posted October 03, 2012 12:00 AM
by cheme_wordsmithy
|
|
I may just be spit-balling here, but I'm guessing a lot of
people don't drink as much water as they should. Enter the reusable water
bottle - a great way to both save the environment, your wallet, or a few trips
to the water fountain everyday while getting the fluids you need.
But what type of water bottle is best? As far as utility
goes, plastic seems like a no-brainer (at least in my book). It's lightweight,
durable, tasteless, easy to clean, (often) transparent, and more insulate (heat
resistant) than metal. But we live in an imperfect world; chemical leaching and
the BPA scare have deemed many plastics to be (skeptically) "unsafe". So what's
a health-concerned person to do who wants a reusable bottle for their water (or
Powerade/Gatorade, apple juice, goat milk, whatever floats your boat…)?
Well, back when I was searching for the right water bottle
for myself a few weeks ago, I did a little research on other water bottle
options besides injection molded plastics. The three realistic alternatives are
stainless steel, aluminum, and glass. Let's take a quick look at each:
Stainless Steel
Stainless steel is steel alloyed with chromium (in a minimum
amount of 10.5% by mass) to make it much more corrosion resistant. Stainless
steel reusable water bottles are typically made from 18/8 alloy, meaning 18%
chromium and 8% nickel. Unlike many other metals and materials, stainless steel
does not leach any chemicals and has minimal problems with rusting or staining
when in contact with water. Stainless steel bottles often have plastic
(typically polypropylene) tops so you don't taste the metal or hurt your teeth
if you hit a bump while drinking. Stainless steel is also very durable,
lightweight, and easy to clean, making it ideal for hikers and office workers
alike. However, it is metal, which means a few things: first, it heats up a lot
faster than plastic. Second, it is still susceptible to some rusting and staining
(especially low-quality stainless steel, though this can usually be cleaned off
with a brush and good washing). Third, it makes a loud clanging sound when it
hits things (I know, minor detail, but it is something).
NOTE: This clanging feature
can also be used as a surefire way to annoy your hiking partner, should you
position the bottle to make noise with ever motion of your pack…
OK, now that that's cleared up, onto aluminum…
Aluminum
Aluminum is a hard, lightweight metal that most people are
familiar with in various forms, from aluminum foil to beverage cans to the
framework of cars and bicycles. Aluminum bottles have similar properties to
stainless steel bottles, both being metal. One benefit of aluminum is that it
is lighter weight than stainless. However, aluminum is less durable than
stainless steel and is also a better conductor; thus it transfers heat (cools
and heats up) faster. Also, because aluminum suffers from leaching, bottles are
coated with a special lining to separate and protect the aluminum from the
water. Because of the possibility of breaking this lining through wear or
scratching, some attest that stainless steel is "safer" to use than aluminum.
Aluminum bottles are also more expensive than their stainless competitors, but
some designs do (arguably) look cooler.
Glass
Glass is an amorphous solid composed largely (~75% by mass)
of silica (SiO2), along with some other metal oxides such as Na2O
and CaO. Glass has a much longer history than other modern materials as a
beverage container. It is superior to metals and plastics in that it does not
suffer from any leaching, rusting, or staining problems, and exhibits (in my
opinion) the best drinking taste of all beverage materials. Oh, if only I had
lived in the era of the glass Coca Cola bottle... *Sigh* Unfortunately, glass has two major flaws: it's heavy and it
breaks. So you can forget about glass if you're planning on doing a lot of
hiking or travelling, unless of course you feel like lugging the extra weight
and don't mind having a razor sharp mess looming in your future. Conveniently,
many glass water bottles are now made with silicone/rubber sleeves for added
protection and grip, making glass more practical for everyday use.
Conclusion
For the hiker in me, I prefer stainless steel to aluminum or
glass for its durability, cost, and chemical "safeness". Besides the weight
factor (and let's face it, the water takes up most of the weight anyway), I just
don't see much benefit of aluminum over stainless steel, especially considering
its higher cost and the factor of the added coating. And while glass bottles
are cool, I can't won't use them for hiking, so I don't see the point of
owning one on top of the stainless or plastic bottle I already have.
I'm curious to hear your thoughts. Has the water bottle
material dilemma ever crossed your mind?
Aluminum Bottle
Image
Glass
Bottle Image
Stainless
Steel Bottle Image
|
|
|
Posted September 26, 2012 12:00 AM
by cheme_wordsmithy
|
|
 Stirred by the Hike
Recently I've been doing a lot of hiking up in the
Adirondack High Peaks region. The climbs and views are spectacular, and the
workout itself can't be beat. The longest (and most recent) hike I did was a 14-mile
round- trip over Nippletop Mt. and Dial Mt. Some of the highlights included a beautiful
waterfall, a quaint little pond, a young and developing forest of saplings, a
nice landscape view from the top of Dial, and a torrential downpour over the last
two miles of trail. It was pretty great.

All this to say, I typically use a 100 oz (~3 liter) bladder
pack to carry the majority of my water. Though I ended up having plenty, I
decided I would also bring an additional 1 liter Nalgene with me as well on the
14 miler. It was an old water bottle, one I had dug up from my parent's place a
month or so beforehand. A few days after the hike, I was reminded somewhere
about the plastic scare that drove Nalgene and other plastic companies to make their bottles out of new
materials. When I checked my own, I found them to be type 7 polycarbonate
plastic; plastic which I knew consisted of the infamous BPA.
BPA - Bad Boy or Bad
Hype?
Bisphenol-A (shown right), or BPA as it is commonly called, is an organic
solid used to make polycarbonate polymers. BPA has had quite a history since
2008, when some government agencies became skeptical about its health safety.
In the wake of certain studies and research, the chemical was said to be linked
to a number of health problems stemming from its identity as a weak endocrine
disruptor (simply put, a chemical that messes with hormones). Its properties
are said to mimic those of estrogen, and alarming concerns have been raised
about its effects on fetuses, infants, and children.
Many European and U.S. administrations, including the US
Food and Drug Administration, European Food Safety Authority, and Environment
Protection Agency (EPA), say that current levels of BPA pose no threat to most
people. Studies by The Endocrine Society say otherwise, and have led to the ban
of BPA in baby bottles and many plastic water bottles.
(<-- Credit: Productwiki Inc.)
I really have mixed feelings about the whole BPA hype. A
study conducted by the EPA said it had concluded that the bodies of healthy
adults rapidly process and eliminate BPA, so that it isn't a concern. However,
anything that says it can mess with hormones sounds fishy to me, so I took the "better
safe than sorry" approach. I bought a replacement bottle advertised as "BPA
free", so I can use it guilt-free at work and on hikes in the future.
Plastics - They All
Leach
Truthfully there are no completely "safe" plastics out
there. Due to the nature of the plastic making process, which typically
involves many steps and additives, there's good reason to believe that most plastic
products leach chemicals at some level. The biggest concerns are from those
chemicals that, like BPA, are characterized by "estrogenic activity".
Unfortunately, a study in Environmental Health Perspectives found that most
plastic products (even BPA free ones) do contain other chemical compounds which
mimic estrogen. Alas, perhaps my BPA-free quest was in vain… at least I got a
new water bottle out of it.
Seriously though, until more studies are done on the effects
of these substances in humans (most
have been done on rats and mice), it's hard to say anything conclusive one way
or another. CR4ers, I would love to hear your opinions on this subject. Right
now, I plan on following the old advice to avoid subjecting my water bottles to
dishwashers and microwaves, as extreme temperatures and abrasion are known to
exacerbate chemical leaching in plastics.
(Credit: Buy.com Inc. -->)
Of course, if you're looking to go completely plastic free,
there are a few good material alternatives to reusable plastic water bottles.
More on that in my next post.
References
Bisphenol A - Wikipedia
Study:
Most Plastics Leach Hormone-Like Chemicals
|
|
|
Posted August 16, 2012 9:32 AM
by HUSH
|
|
Note: This is NOT a blog promoting a political agenda. All allusions to politics are purely for entertainment, so keep your non-paint opinions to yourself!
It's the debate that has lasted far too long, and puts
friends and family at permanent odds. It has caused divorces, bankruptcies, and
even fistfights amongst
nuns.
What debate am I referring to? It's not the existential man
vs. woman examination, the adorable puppies vs. babies argument, or the delicious burger vs. hot
dog dispute. (Where do I stand on the issues this election season? Women;
puppies; and burgers. Here here!)
Nope. It's latex vs. oil. Paint that is. Just paint, okay?
Yours truly knows his way around a roller tray, with
sections on my resume including stints as a painter, as well as a paint
salesman. Naturally I have a predisposition, but I'll offer my best
non-partisan take to provide you--the voter--with the facts needed to make an
educated choice.
No amount of buttons can stop me from delivering the facts!...via Freedom's Phoenix
Paint History
Last year, South African archeologists discovered the
remnants of a paint-production process estimated to be 100,000 years old.
Uncovering new rock layers in a cave already known to be an anthropological
goldmine, researchers discovered seashells that had been dyed red from ocher, a
clay that is red in color from naturally occurring hematite. The ocher and
animals bones were ground and heated, releasing marrow. After adding some
urine, cave-folks found they had a spreadable paste.
...via Freddy and Petunia
Paint has been used henceforth, from early stick figures and
maps--to the Italian Renaissance--to discussing
with your wife what color to paint the den. No, not white. How about artic white? Or off-white, or pure white, or
cream white, or toned white, or…..
Painting:
so easy a caveman can do it. Or a politician… *rimshot*
Binders (of Paints!)
The binder is the most important component of the paint, as
it is responsible for the sheen level (flat, matte, eggshell, gloss, etc.),
adhesion, and durability. While we can obviously rattle on for days about
different binder types, let's keep this simple and keep the discussion between
latex and oil. (See how I glazed right over voting alternatives? Just like
two-party politics! Burrrrn!)
The Candidates: Oil and Latex
The first thing you notice about oil paint is the smell. It
has a decidedly heavy odor, and good ventilation must be provided during
application. Smell is decidedly in favor of latex paint; with a mild aroma it still requires ventilation.
Preparation is higher in degree when working with oil paints, and thinning must
be done with turpentine or mineral spirits. Latex only requires water.
"He's only smiling until he sees the divorce papers," she was reported as saying...via Shelby Paint
Whatever is being painted is obviously a consideration. Oil
paints work best on metal, bare wood, and dirty surfaces. Latex paint, is a water-based
film, so it swells wood grain and when dried, cannot offer the flexible coating
desirable for metal surfaces. Oil also has a smoother, more finished appearance
when dry. Oil-based paint also offers a
higher degree of durability, though it has a shorter service life--it discolors
and peels far quicker than latex. Latex paint dries about 85% faster than oil
paints and it is perfect for non-traffic areas, including exteriors.
Oil paint and its associated solvents are toxic in nature,
so government restrictions (aghhh!) apply to their disposal. Even long-cured
latex paint is removable with just warm water and soap.
The Choice
Your vote depends largely upon your material, traffic needs,
and skill level. Latex paint is perfect for the weekend DIYer, and even most
professional painters use latex on prepared drywall and plaster.
I think P. Diddy may be taking this whole paint thing a little too far...via Huff Post
No matter your choice though, there is no right or wrong.
It's about being a part of the democratic process! It's your CR4 civic duty!
Voice your vote in the responses below!
Resources
My brain
HG TV - Painting 101: Oil or Latex
Home Addition Plus: Oil Based Paint versus Latex Based Paint
Wikipedia - Paint
Live Science - Oldest Human Paint-Making Studio Discover in Cave
|
|
|
|
Posted January 24, 2012 9:58 AM
|
|
While some inventors do strike it rich, commercializing an idea is a long, complex process that requires time, money, and patience. Are you a do-it-yourselfer with a garage full of interesting contraptions or a notebook filled with sketches for the latest and greatest idea? Are you considering a patent for one of your ideas? What about marketing your product to a wider audience? Does your company have intellectual property rules that prohibit you from going it alone?
The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Coatings & Surface Engineering, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Coatings & Surface Engineering today.
|
|
|
|
Posted January 06, 2012 7:00 AM
|
|
As food production processes become more automated, there is a need for food-grade coatings and lubricants to keep the machines running smoothly and the food safe for consumption. One company, Ecology Coatings, is filing a patent for "UV-curable products that can be used safely in direct contact with food for both humans and animals." Are green coatings now cornering the food-friendly market?
The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Coatings & Surface Engineering, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Coatings & Surface Engineering today.
|
|
|
|
Posted December 02, 2011 9:15 AM
|
|
Pike Research reports that the market for green chemistry is poised to grow from $2.8 billion in 2011 to $98.5 billion by 2020. While many companies are just now building pilot labs to test green products, they have their eyes on the immense chemical products market. Is your company investing in green chemistry, and if so, what industry sectors are you focused on?
The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Coatings & Surface Engineering, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Coatings & Surface Engineering today.
|
|
|
Show all Blog Entries in this Blog
|
|
|
Search this Section
|
|
|
Chemical & Material Science:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search this Blog
|
|
|
Coatings & Surface Engineering:
|
|
|
|
|
|