Login | Register
The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion®

GEA's Global HVAC Technology Blog

GEA's Global HVAC Technology Blog covers a range of topics including:

  • Core HVAC Technologies
  • Technology & Patent Evaluation
  • Manufacturing Technologies
  • Product Quality Improvement
  • Materials/Failures/Corrosion
  • Product/Technology Commercialization
  • Business Strategy Development
  • New Factory Design & Equipment

We'll draw upon our range of experts to provide comments, insights, technical articles and a little humor from time to time

We encourage your participation and feedback!

Previous in Blog: Refrigerants Dominate Discussion at IRC (Prague, Czech Republic)   Next in Blog: Are You Ready for the Re-Shoring Backlash?
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







5 comments

Material Selection: Where Imitation is Not the Highest Form of Flattery

Posted September 07, 2011 10:45 AM by geanorm

Editor's Note: CR4 would like to thank PJ Sikorsky of GEA Consulting for contributing this blog entry.

Imitation may be the highest form of flattery, but it's not necessarily the best material selection process.

This is the third of five follow-up blog posts referring to my initial post on five common errors/problems with material selection. This time we'll discuss the problems that can arise when we simply copy material selections from similar parts.

Reportedly it's common for mapmakers to intentionally include minor errors, such as non-existent, or misspelled streets or rivers, in their published maps so they can determine if their competitors are merely copying their products rather than legitimately creating maps themselves. Clearly, this is a risk engineers may be taking when they copy previous designs - the risk of copying and promulgating errors that were made in the originals. But there are less obvious risks in copying material selections from one part to another similar part.

Material properties such as hardness, strength and toughness do not necessarily scale geometrically. For example, during World War II a new class of cargo ships, called Liberty Ships, was created to meet the overwhelming demand for shipping materiel across the Atlantic Ocean in wartime. Unfortunately a number of these ships fractured and sank in the North Atlantic because the water temperature fell below the ductile to brittle transition temperature of the steel used to construct the hulls. The steel used to construct these ships was the same as had been used historically to build similar ships which did not fracture and sink, so what changed? A couple of things:

1) The new ships were much larger than previous ships and subsequently required thicker steel to provide adequate strength.

2) To speed the construction of the ships, they changed from riveted to welded construction. The steel which had adequate toughness for small riveted ships, did not have adequate toughness for larger welded ships.

Fortunately most of the problems which arise from inappropriately copying material selections from similar parts do not have the tragic consequences of sinking Liberty Ships, however they can lead to premature component failure or excessive costs. The bottom line is to always consider what is different between new and old part designs and discuss the material selection with a qualified materials engineer.

- PJ Sikorsky

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ketchikan, AK, USA
Posts: 12932
Good Answers: 463
#1

Re: Material Selection: Where Imitation is Not the Highest Form of Flattery

09/08/2011 3:07 AM

I was not aware that seawater temperatures of slightly below 32°F (0°C) would move the metal (SA-36 plate?) into the brittle zone, but I could be wrong.

I have heard of workmanship stories like this: Instead of doing proper root and subsequent weld passes, welders under time pressure would lay a few rods into the bottom of the weld, and then just do the upper passes. This would leave unfused gaps at the root of the weld, creating a stress riser in addition to the reduced weld thickness.

I don't know the thicknesses of plate involved, nor whether preheat/postheat would be required. (And maybe some of this was not well known at the time, anyway).

Until the early 1980s (and maybe even now), some of the old Liberty (and Knot) ships were still in use as seafood processing plants in Dutch Harbor, Alaska.

It would be interesting to know more of the whole story.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 512
Good Answers: 11
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Material Selection: Where Imitation is Not the Highest Form of Flattery

09/08/2011 9:29 AM

Check out UCS-66 in ASME Section VIII. I can't remember if SA-36 is curve A or B, but both of these have high minimum design temperatures. If it's curve A, anything above 0.5 inches thick is below brittle fracture temperature in that water.

Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Marine Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancleave, Ms about 30 miles inland from Biloxi and the coast
Posts: 2376
Good Answers: 82
#3

Re: Material Selection: Where Imitation is Not the Highest Form of Flattery

09/08/2011 1:13 PM

Very interesting. I suspect the main reason for failure in Liberty ship hulls was the time element. Shortcuts were taken and inspection may have been inadequate. Welders with little experience were probably pressed into service. You have heard of the record times from keel landing and launch in just a few days. Not much QA could be done in such a short time. The wrong material may have entered into the problem and may have been the only material available at the time. I'm sure the care taken in the construction of a warship would not have been used on Liberty ships. Liberty ships were "quick and dirty" and would not be subject to close scrutiny. I'm sure the "welding rod filler with weld bead over" was used and certainly would cause failure in a heavy sea.

I worked as an inspector back in the 60's and would fail welds made in 1//2" steel plates on nuclear submarines. Welders would fail to remove slag between multi-pass welds and I would report it and make them grind out all the weld and do it over again. They were not working at a Liberty ship time frame, but still didn't do the job right.

__________________
Almost as smart as the average bear
Reply
Member

Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 7
#4

Re: Material Selection: Where Imitation is Not the Highest Form of Flattery

09/08/2011 4:24 PM

As I understand the history of the problems with Liberty Ships, there were instances of substandard workmanship, but the primary issues were: 1. By increasing steel thickness, the state of stress changed from plane strain and through-thickness toughness (where the material is inherently more brittle) governed the fracture mechanics of the steel plates. 2. The change to welded construction allowed cracks to run greater distances without being interrupted with catastrophic results. With riveted construction, cracks could be arrested (at least temporarily) in shorter distances. Thanks for the interesting discussion. PJ

Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#5

Re: Material Selection: Where Imitation is Not the Highest Form of Flattery

10/24/2011 1:49 AM

Sometimes the construction was also a factor, for a few liberty ships sank at their moorings!

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 5 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); cingold (1); psikorsky (1); ronseto (1); Tornado (1)

Previous in Blog: Refrigerants Dominate Discussion at IRC (Prague, Czech Republic)   Next in Blog: Are You Ready for the Re-Shoring Backlash?