Re: Is That a Crashed Flying Saucer on the Seabed?
02/03/2012 10:15 AM
A leap of faith? Hardly.
Application of Occam's Razor leads me directly to this being a craft from another world. A craft capable of surviving the harshness of space, a crew capable of finding this rock (earth) amid the staggering emptiness of space... only to end the exploratory journey by crashing it into the ocean.
Re: Is That a Crashed Flying Saucer on the Seabed?
02/04/2012 11:50 AM
Nah, not USO. Cruise ships have escape pods that look very similar. It may be the pod the Italian Captain fell out and landed into that lifeboat. I'm not sure how it got to the Baltic Sea but that may be another pod.
How
do they serve alcoholic drinks on Italian cruise ships?
On the
rocks
What vegetables do you get with dinner on
Italian cruise ships?
Leeks
What's the fastest way to get off an
Italian cruise ship?
Follow the captain
When the captain
of the ill fated Costa Concordia was asked if he
knew where he was going he
replied "off course."
__________________
If they want holy water, tell them to boil the hell out of it.
Re: Is That a Crashed Flying Saucer on the Seabed?
02/05/2012 12:07 AM
I like the part at the end, of the article, where they try to suggest it is a gun turret on a sunken ship. A 200 foot gun turret on a ship would be bigger news than a USO.
__________________
(Larrabee's Law) Half of everything you hear in a classroom is crap. Education is figuring out which half is which.
Re: Is That a Crashed Flying Saucer on the Seabed?
02/05/2012 4:49 AM
I think it's highly amusing that the CR4 Admin posted the picture of the Monitor's gun turret (especially after the recent anniversay thread!) rather than the picture of the USO...guess s/he didn't read the whole article closely enough....
That makes it extraordinarily improbable that the Baltic Sea object is
something that fell from the stars. The simpler solution is that it's a
geological formation or some sunken vessel. The circular shape certainly
suggests a gun turret, as seen in the above photo of the turret on the
Civil War's Monitor ironclad ship.
My bold.
__________________
Chaos always wins because it's better organised.
Re: Is That a Crashed Flying Saucer on the Seabed?
02/05/2012 4:45 AM
Much as I doubt that it's a UFO/USO, there are some statements in that piece that just beg to be taken apart
Unless aliens are clumsier that the Three Stooges, it's unlikely that
they would be able to travel for light-years only to botch it up in the
few thousand final feet of altitude.
Why? Haven't both NASA and The Beagle2 lost craft in the Martian atmosphere after crossing space? What if the clever little/big critters have come from a planet with widely different gravity to ours and an inexperienced pilot lost it?
Over the past three decades there have been nearly 15 million commercial
airline flights, but just a few dozen crashes. Do occasionally visiting
aliens have a horrendously worse safety record? It's hard to believe
they would have managed to get off of their home planet in one piece.
Who says/knows they only visit occasionally? Or if they visit this rock only occasionally, perhaps we're the equivalent of a tiny Pacific island that doesn't get planes landing, but where one happens to crash.
Perhaps the occupants were fugitives, or on the losing side in a battle, looking for "any port in a storm"....
__________________
Chaos always wins because it's better organised.
Re: Is That a Crashed Flying Saucer on the Seabed?
02/07/2012 4:41 AM
Rebuke duly read, marked, learnt and inwardly digested. You are, of course, (in this case anyway ) entirely correct. My first sentence should have commenced "Whilst I doubt that this is alien technology...."
__________________
Chaos always wins because it's better organised.
Re: Is That a Crashed Flying Saucer on the Seabed?
02/05/2012 1:03 PM
Did anyone ever think that they may have run out of Element 127 that's used to propel their spacecraft, and that they had to crash land wherever they could? LOL
Probably they ran out of breathable Argon gas too, and suffocated as a result....
Mmmmmm petrified ET corpses.
__________________
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"; hendiatris attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar, 47 B.C.
Re: Is That a Crashed Flying Saucer on the Seabed?
02/06/2012 6:32 PM
All humor aside... no, wait... all humor included...
The original reference to "USO" AFIK is from Ivan T. Sanderson. In his case it stood for "Unidentified Submerged Object." His book, "Invisible Visitors," was about the possibility of intelligently guided USOs. Maybe the stuff of fantasies, but just as enjoyable an adventure as any Star Wars movie. Are there archaeological anomalies? I think so. They are mostly ignored. (Now, that's a contentious subject!) Even before the Cremo book, as far back as 1974, William R. Corliss spent a LOT of time compiling natural "anomalies." Just like UFOs (for those who find that subject entertaining, an interesting article is here. It can be fun to discover holes or overlooked explanations), where many sightings can be due to other explanations, but a few that seem to defy all reasonable explanations, some anomalies are intriguing and seem to persist.
Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers: