Login | Register
The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion®


Engineering News

Latest news of interest to engineers. Sourced from GlobalSpec's Engineering News

Previous in Blog: Patents Weren't Designed to Stifle Innovation and Take a Massive Toll On Holders   Next in Blog: In the Hall of Mechanical King
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







7 comments

Causes Of Death: 1900 vs. 2010

Posted June 30, 2012 7:13 PM

From Neatorama:

Here's a nifty little chart from the New England Journal of Medicine that shows how far we've come, and how far we still need to go, in the field of medicine over the last hundred and ten years. It's surprising to note how much more cancer we deal with nowadays, and how heart disease rates have risen despite all the advances we've made in the realm of cardiology. Enjoy a weekend free of gastrointestinal infections everyone!

Read the whole article

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 4034
Good Answers: 380
#1

Re: Causes Of Death: 1900 vs. 2010

07/01/2012 1:40 AM

I see suicide made it into the top ten list over the last 100+ years.

Whats that say about society as a whole now?

__________________
Time, Money & Ambition. My wife seems to think I am overflowing with all three. I however have never given any indications of such nonsense.
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Atchison Village
Posts: 276
Good Answers: 21
#3
In reply to #1

Re: Causes Of Death: 1900 vs. 2010

07/02/2012 12:51 AM

Suicide was rarely reported as such because it was considered shameful. Cancer similarly. Alzheimer's was called senility. We're doing a LOT better.

__________________
Align culture with nature...
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United Kingdom - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harlow England
Posts: 15257
Good Answers: 498
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Causes Of Death: 1900 vs. 2010

07/02/2012 3:54 AM

I think it's part of the human condition... the price we pay for a big brain that can think too much and thus worry.
Same as Cheetah with a sprained ankle is prob' doomed.
Maybe being thick has compensations?
There probably isn't any more cancer, prob' just more is diagnosed or reported as the cause of death.
In Neolithic times there were no deaths due to 'cancer', but a lot of deaths caused by 'Uggg him dead'
Del

__________________
health warning: These posts may contain traces of nut.
Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Optical Engineering - Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Member Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Trantor
Posts: 3024
Good Answers: 305
#2

Re: Causes Of Death: 1900 vs. 2010

07/01/2012 8:37 AM

The findings don't surprise me. As some diseases are cured, the odds are that people will live longer and contract diseases that have a longer 'incubation' time (so to speak). I.e., aging brings an increased risk of heart disease as the heart wears out; likewise some cancers are due to long-term exposures or due to an accumulation effect from a chosen lifestyle. Same with neurological diseases like alzheimer's.

Compared to 100 years ago we live longer due to improved medicine, to better nutrition (refrigeration, understanding of food preparation), to better and quicker access to hospitals and emergency care and immediate care facilities. We also have better access to medical information. And of course, there is less chance of dying an accidental death from working at a computer than operating farm machinery.

As for the increased rate of suicides, I have to believe that is partly due to the constant barrage of bad news we get from media. Whether its the bad news we get a steady dose of on local evening news, or horrible news from all over the world we see on the 24/7 news and opinion networks and the internet, it can be pretty d@mn depressing to watch that stuff.

__________________
"...any library is a good library that does not contain a volume by Jane Austen. Even if it contains no other book." - Mark Twain
Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 390
Good Answers: 18
#5

Re: Causes Of Death: 1900 vs. 2010

07/02/2012 5:53 AM

The full article is available at:

http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1113569

and is worthwhile reading for anyone with an interest in the subject. The subject of diseases emerging (HIV and those consequent on the management of diabetes) as well as virtually disappearing (diphtheria and TB) is discussed. Senilitry disappears and Alzheimer's appears in its stead. Motor accidents appeared as an important cause of death in the 1930s and were relegated in the 1990s.

Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 557
Good Answers: 26
#6

Re: Causes Of Death: 1900 vs. 2010

07/02/2012 6:10 AM

More people die of heart disease and cancer now because they don't die younger of the other causes prevalent in 1900. The mortality rate is still 100% from all causes.

Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 141
Good Answers: 15
#7

Re: Causes Of Death: 1900 vs. 2010

07/02/2012 12:27 PM

As Jim Morrison is reputed to have stated, "Nobody gets outta here alive."

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Del the cat (1); ormondotvos (1); osborne83 (1); phph001 (1); Rixter (1); tcmtech (1); Usbport (1)

Previous in Blog: Patents Weren't Designed to Stifle Innovation and Take a Massive Toll On Holders   Next in Blog: In the Hall of Mechanical King