|
Zach pulled his Ford into Kelly's driveway, flicked his
lights off, and unbuckled his seat belt. Kelly opened her car door, and Zach
was holding her coat while she looked for her keys in her purse. They had a
nice evening; they ate a cliché dinner at the Cheesecake Factory, and then saw
a movie: Harry Potter and I Can't Believe
this Franchise is Still Going.
Zach wanted to see Total Recall, but
sacrificed his want to make Kelly happy.
Kelly jingled her keys, and looked at Zach blankly. Zach
leaned forward, puckered his lips…and Kelly slouched away.
"Oh, no. Oh, jeez. I'm sorry Zach, I just don't see you that
way. You're a great friend, but you're that, a friend." Kelly went inside, and didn't return Zach's phone call
the next day.
A week later Zach learned that
Kelly has been dating A.C. Slater. Slater wasn't nice, didn't take Kelly out on
dates, and was arrogant. Slater was a jerk, and Kelly loved him.
...via NY Post
There is an underlying mythos in the dating world that women
like jerks. Something about their cockiness or selfishness just makes women
fascinated--or at least, allegedly so.
Is it true? Do women really want guys who walk all over
them? It doesn't seem to make sense. People are drawn to people with similar
interests, who are polite, and unlikely to misplace trust.

Let's see what some experts have
to say on the matter, shall we?
Let's further define 'jerk' so we have a basis from which to
compare. While Urban Dictionary lists it as, "The kind of guy most girls
ACTUALLY want," I prefer Dictionary.com's version: "A contemptibly naive,
fatuous, foolish, or inconsequential person." Other adjectives that may describe a jerk:
stubborn, critical, aggressive, and disagreeable.
Physcologist Scott Barry Kaufman wrote that when analyzing
how mating was related to certain character attributes, he noticed one glaring
connection: The lower the level of agreeableness, the more sexual partners.
Similarly, this
study indicates that the so-called "Dark Triad" traits (narcissism,
psychopathy, and Machiavellianism) are
good indicators of short-term heterosexual relationships. Or, to be blunt,
booty-calls and hook ups. While these were a predictor of sexual partners, they
also predicted long-term relationships would be unsuccessful and mostly
unhappy. Specifically, narcissists seek social environments in which to
validate their ego, which only strengthens the personality qualities women find
attractive. Those being: confidence, creativity, humor, charisma, and high
energy. Essentially, if the male is more comfortable in a setting, he is more
likely to find a sexual partner. The most comfortable of men are those who are
unafraid of their social stature, hence the attractive qualities of
narcissists.
Want to
see where you stand in the Dark Triad?
...via Terra Incognita
Part
of the allure of a jerk could be a little bit of conditioning as well. Jerky
guys tend to be non-committal towards females. Jen Kim, of Psychology Today, wrote:
Women want some chase, some drama, some intrigue. If it's too easy
to get the guy, then she might think, "Wait, he just fell into my lap.
This is fishy. Maybe he thinks that I'm too good for him. Cool. I'm too good
for him. Wait, if I'm too good for him, then that means I could do better.
Next!" I hate to say this, but this thought has crossed my mind (and I'm
sure others' as well) more than once.
There
is one glaring conflict though: in Chelsey H's blog, "What
Women Want," she mentions that women are attracted on a biological level. Aren't
these traits exactly what women are trying to avoid? You know, further
depreciation of her offspring's potential gene pool?
Matt Huston,
former editor of Psychology Today,
theorizes that being a jerk is actually an indicator of good genetics, and not
bad genetics. These individuals essentially, can "put their money where their
mouth is" by taking risks from being a bad boy, and are better emotionally
developed (hardened?) to take the consequences of being a jerk and build upon
them. A VERY similar concept has been put forth, but related to salary. Timothy
A. Judge's study
suggests that disagreeable men get further in the business world by taking
risks, and though they are more likely to get fired than a 'yes man,' they're
also more likely to get a new job at a better wage. In fact, disagreeable men
make 18% more annually than agreeable men-averaging $10,000!
...via Atomic Movie Freak
While
I've seemed to make a good case for treating your girlfriend horribly (which,
for the record, I do not condone; I don't know why I need to make that clear …)
there is one issue I need to circle back too: long term relationships. Just as
the Dark Triad-or the jerk traits-tend to indicate a good number of sexual
partners, they also indicate long-term relationship success. Or rather
disaster. Higher scores of narcissism and psychopathy predict unhappy long term
relationships-or more accurately, no long term relationships. These traits are
in direct conflict with compromise and compassion, two highly-heralded pillars
of relationship success .
Do
women like jerks? Do nice guys finish last? It seems it depends on the race. In
the sprint for sex, jerks will take the tape. But in the marathon setting of a
long term relationship, jerks are left for dead with heat exhaustion .
Resources
Psychology Today - Do Girls Really Love A**holes?; Do A**holes Really Finish First?; Use Your Mating Intelligence
Personality and Individual Differences: ISSID - How the Dark Triad traits predict relationship choices (.pdf)
Ask Men - The Jerk Appeal
LoveScience - Why Do Women Love Jerks?
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology - Do Nice Guys - and Gals - Really Finish Last? The Joint Effects of Sex and Agreeableness on Income (.pdf)
|
Comments rated to be Good Answers:
Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers: