Login | Register
The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion®


Engineering News

Latest news of interest to engineers. Sourced from GlobalSpec's Engineering News

Previous in Blog: 'No sign' of Amelia Earhart Wreck   Next in Blog: Greenland Hits 97 Percent Meltdown in July
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







9 comments

Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

Posted July 24, 2012 1:00 PM

From CNET News:

Is it time to upgrade your RPTV? Are new RPTVs worth it? Read on to find out.

Read the whole article

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: The 'Space Coast', USA
Posts: 7441
Good Answers: 568
#1

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/24/2012 2:24 PM

You can't even give rear projection TVs away around here. Seen them sitting in front of people's homes along the road for weeks. Trash truck won't even take them.

Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA, Florida
Posts: 955
Good Answers: 92
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/24/2012 4:06 PM

That's funny and true.

I bought a 65" RP TV for $3,200.00. Used it for 5 years, it was working perfectly, and couldn't get $500.00 for it.

__________________
An obstacle is something you see when you take your eyes off the goal.
Reply
Member

Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/25/2012 10:18 AM

My 6 year old SONY LCD RP still performs great. I've changed one bulb, that's it. One thing of note is the sound out of these units is head and shoulders above what comes out of the new thin units. I know, duh, but the sound quality makes the 720p a much better viewing experience than my similar 1080 lcd.

Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member CR4 Admins - CR4 Admin - CR4 Admin

Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 918
Good Answers: 6
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/25/2012 12:08 PM

I like RP, but they are massive and take up lots of room. Plus, who likes replacing bulbs on their tv?

Reply
Member

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 7
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/25/2012 12:14 PM

Better to replace a bulb than a TV. What do you do with a CFL-driven LCD when its backlight goes out?

__________________
smartalix
Reply
Member

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 7
#3

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/25/2012 9:28 AM

I thought this was a site for engineers!

;-)

Seriously, though, there are very significant differences between RPTVs based on their core technology. While I would not own a CRT-based set (I do have a CRT gun from an old Sony in my office), I may keep an LCD-based HDTV in the basement if I had one, and I would be happy with a DLP-based 6-color 52-inch HDTV RPTV in my living room. DLP, sadly the only American-based HDTV tech left, is an excellent display system, and an RPTV with a replaceable bulb will last as long as your house.

Having said that, an LED-driven LCD is probably the best thing out there for TV until OLED gets over its packaging and aging issues. But for bang for buck, DLP RPTV is tough to beat.

__________________
smartalix
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Near Frankfurt am Main, Germany. 50.390866N, 8.884827E
Posts: 13074
Good Answers: 127
#7

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/25/2012 4:54 PM

The best TVs today for the price are LED lit LCD. Plasma is better but more expensive and prone to missing oixels after a certain usage.

All RPs should be burnt at the stake, not good. Its basically only a Video projectoor in a box.....

Watch out for at least 5 msec update or faster, and as high contrast ratio as possible.......

A good test is to make a video of a lawn (cut grass), track slowly, watch on the TV, if the blades of grass "pump", don't buy the TV!!!!!

__________________
A man who can make a fool of himself in three languages strikes me as a three-time-bigger fool than a man who is confined to one! John le Carré/David John Moore Cornwell - The Tailor of Panama.
Reply
Member

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 7
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/25/2012 5:42 PM

Well, DLP has a 16 microsecond response speed.

__________________
smartalix
Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: May 2006
Location: The 'Space Coast', USA
Posts: 7441
Good Answers: 568
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Rear Projection vs LCD vs Plasma

07/25/2012 5:59 PM

That maybe, but there is a lot of other things in the signal path that are the real problem.

Rear projection is sort of like CRT. Nobody wants them any more and you can't give them away because they are so inferior in picture quality compared to today's technology.

That being said, we use an HD projector, which is not so much better, but we probably only watch something two or three times a month. Frankly, there simply isn't much in the way of good and intelligent programming out there to make it worth while spending large amounts of cash on a video system nor do I want some behemoth in my room.

We have simply found more fun activities to do in life than watch TV.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 9 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Alix (3); Andy Germany (1); Anonymous Hero (2); Baxter (1); Mango (1); WJMFIRE (1)

Previous in Blog: 'No sign' of Amelia Earhart Wreck   Next in Blog: Greenland Hits 97 Percent Meltdown in July