Login | Register

IEEE Spectrum's Tech Talk

IEEE Spectrum magazine is the flagship publication of the IEEE, the world's largest professional technology association. It is a monthly magazine for technology innovators, business leaders, and the intellectually curious and is read by over 385,000 technology professionals worldwide. Spectrum explores future technology trends and the impact of those trends on society and business. In our Tech Talk blog, the IEEE Spectrum editorial staff and contributors will report on and opine about current events in all areas of technology big and small. From the aerospace industry to nanotechnology, biomedical applications to particle accelerators, intellectual property spats to bold business moves, Tech Talk covers it all, giving readers a unique perspective on issues that impact engineers.

Previous in Blog: Robotics, Incorporated   Next in Blog: Death, Taxes, and Fingerprint Sensors
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







14 comments

Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

Posted August 03, 2007 4:07 PM by Harry Goldstein
Pathfinder Tags: 35W bridge collapse Minneapolis
User-tagged by 1 user

PHOTO: Harry Goldstein, IEEE Spectrum

A report in today's Minneapolis Star-Tribune states that the Minnesota Department of Transportation "last winter considered bolting steel plates" to the trusses on the 35W bridge "to prevent cracking in fatigued metal," and even went so far as to ask contractors for advice on the best way to accomplish the task.

The move was prompted by the URS Corporation June 2006 report, which recommended "three equally viable" retrofit approaches:

(1) Steel plating of all 52 fracture critical truss members. This approach will provide member redundancy to each of the identified fracture critical members via additional plates bolted to the existing webs. The critical issue of this approach is to ensure that no new defects are introduced to the existing web plates through drilled holes. This approach is generally most conservative but its relatively high cost may not be justified by the actual levels of stresses the structure experiences [although it's worth noting that the simulation data used to calculate these stress levels might, by URS's own admission, have been inadequate; see Reports on Bridge Condition Raise Questions].

(2) Non-destructive examination (NDE) and removal of all measurable defects at suspected weld details of all 52 fracture critical truss members. The critical issue of this approach is to ensure that no measurable defects are missed by the NDE efforts. The fracture mechanics analysis has indicated that the dimensions of preexisting surface cracks need to be at least one quarter of the web plate thickness in order to grow and subsequently cause member fracture under traffic load. This approach is most cost efficient.

(3) A combination of the above two approaches: steel plating of the 24 more fatigue sensitive members…and NDE of the 28 more fracture sensitive members.

As MnDOT's Dan Dorgan said yesterday at a press conference, "We chose the inspection route." And although Dorgan denies there was dissension among MnDOT's engineers, the Star-Tribune quotes an anonymous source identified only as an "industry official" as saying, "There were people over there [in MnDOT] that were deathly afraid that this kind of tragedy was going to be visited on us….There were people in the department that were screaming to have these replaced."


Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guest
#1

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

08/03/2007 11:57 PM

I find it somewhat ironic that this happened in MN considering that the MN DOT has always considered themselves so advanced in infrastructure development. Just drive by their testing facility on I94 east of St. Cloud sometime.

Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Albertville, Minnesota USA
Posts: 9
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

11/16/2007 9:11 AM

Mn/DOT's pavement research facility is not an indication that we consider ourselves "advanced", only that we wish to find the best infrastructure solutions through research and development.

Guest
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

11/28/2007 2:39 PM

Plus, nearly every state has pavement testing and research facilities. CALTrans standards are referenced by multiple other States DOTs, and we still have facilities falling apart. Good research doesn't mean the proper maintenance and construction projects are getting completed. DOTs are constrained by budgets. You can onlyaddress what you can pay the contractors/labor to work on. So maybe the politicians felt that saving a little on the budget now was more acceptable than addressing the issues immediately.

Guest
#4

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

01/02/2008 3:38 PM

And, once again, we are rudely reminded that there is little (political glory) in preventative maintenance, or scheduled replacement at the end of design service lives...

There is, however, plenty of (political hay) to be made in being the more politically visible (finger of guilt) pointing at engineering practitioners who have been left (holding the bag of accountability) after trying to shore up (politically unglamorous little trivialities, like) interstate transportation systems, while (equipped) with what are euphemistically refered to as mere pitances of (inspection, maintenance, and/or replacement) budgets...

Or simply, if the money is not available to operate properly, then why aren't the money-deny-ers at least partially accountable?

Participant

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

01/02/2008 5:13 PM

Amen to the last entry. It is time that we take responsibility for the politicians we put in office and the issues we vote for. It is time to put our money where our mouth is and rebuild our infrastructure instead of sending our children to war in a loosing situation that is costing our country trillions. Also remembering those who put there lives at risk daily working in such hostile work envirenments that are continuosly changing each day. I mean how would you like cars driving past your desk at 80 mph? We all have a responsibility to our infrastructure and it is time to take account!

Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - bwire

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upper Mid-west USA
Posts: 1645
Good Answers: 9
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

01/26/2008 9:36 PM

Our aging infrastructure issue ah yes, I'll date myself as I remember that as a point of substantive argument given by Bil Clinton as a candidate for president first term. And little if anything was done primarily because the entrenched internal bureaucracy marches onward regardless of political angst.

Put our money in real productive infrastructure improvement, not in asphalt which in the long run cost 3 times that of concrete roadways. Engineers should not also have management hats.

But we're not losing over there and you can tell because it's still over there and not here!

__________________
bwise
Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - bwire

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upper Mid-west USA
Posts: 1645
Good Answers: 9
#7

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

01/26/2008 9:43 PM

Lack of integrity both of personal effectiveness and structural integrity is the cause.

But oh they have plausible deniability clauses, FIRE THEM ALL or step aside Governor.

__________________
bwise
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - bwire

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upper Mid-west USA
Posts: 1645
Good Answers: 9
#8

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

01/26/2008 9:58 PM

Eh? Maybe not. I'm curious by the lack of observation. Remember the day it fell? The media cameras captured a bridge foundation stanchion in the river. I draw interest of this because this foundational support member was askew; yes leaning 15 degrees or more. There was a sheared steel member attached to its top.

No way no how short of tectonic forces should that foundation member have been caused to waver the slightest bit but no mention of it at all; curious...

__________________
bwise
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 629
Good Answers: 9
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

02/08/2008 4:57 PM

Hmm, having worked for URS, I realize that by the time they would have recognized a problem and reported it to MN, it was probably very serious. Maybe the consultant should have spoken up louder also. Though i realize drawing attention to a clients failures to solve serious publi safety issues is not going to maintain long-term strategic accounts relationships.

Associate

Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 25
#10

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

04/02/2008 10:21 AM

We as engineers need to educate the public as to the importance on maintenance and repair of existing infrastructure. In the field I work in almost all of it is buried and forgotten until there is a problem.

__________________
http://waterandwastewaterengineering.blogspot.com/
Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Just outside of Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8
#14
In reply to #10

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

07/23/2008 11:46 PM

That one bridge collapse will bring to light the failures inherent in the design. Fatigue played a roll here, and the inadequate responses to an obvious weakening, as stated in the engineers' report, dated 2 years prior to the collapse event. It's apparent that numerous failures led to the disaster, on the human, and mechanical levels. The task ahead of us, boggles the mind.

Guru

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Piney Flats, Tennessee
Posts: 650
Good Answers: 13
#11

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

06/02/2008 12:10 AM

I had crossed that bridge several times over the years traveling. One thing I remember thinking was strange was when you came onto the bridge you kind of dropped a little. It was noticeable even to my kids. but that was 3 or 4 years before it fell.

I thought wow the shock hitting those trusses must have great impact. What is this bridge built out of that can take this abuse. Most bridges you come on to make you rise a little then smoothly take you out on the span. This one kind of dropped you on the span.

__________________
Of all the things I have lost I miss my mind the most.
Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Just outside of Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 8
#12
In reply to #11

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

07/15/2008 11:54 PM

I agree with you concerning the 'dip'. Prior to the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake in California, the Cypress Structure had the same 'dips' in the slab sections. The slabs were approximately 80' wide, and 120' long, and tended to sag in the middle. The design retrofit was delayed due to a lack of funding, which I'm sure led to the failure of the structure. Sad, really, that money holds the greater value, over life itself.

imintowater

================================

'Chance favors the prepared mind.'

Guru

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: California
Posts: 629
Good Answers: 9
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Did MnDOT Make a Fatal Choice?

07/16/2008 11:40 AM

Such is the way of our governemtn agencies. I heard last night that even the EPA has devalued a human life over the past 10 years from like $7 million to $6 million. It is getting cheaper to kill a human being, well at least for corporations and government agencies, I suspect regular people would still spend a similar amount of time in prison.

14 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

bwire (3), dadw5boys (1), dmrsch (1), Guest (3), imintowater (2), leanhard (1), panheadlisa (1), RCE (2)

Previous in Blog: Robotics, Incorporated   Next in Blog: Death, Taxes, and Fingerprint Sensors
You might be interested in: Fieldbus Products, Transistors, All Types, Trade Journals, Books and Technical Publications