Login | Register

Kate’s Controversies

Kate's Controversies is a place for conversation and discussion about controversies in science, technology, engineering, and many other topics. Kate, the blog's owner, will use this blog to publicly ask "WHY?" to controversial topics that catch her eye.


*Please note: This is a controversial blog where I try to present interesting topics that are controversial. Just because I choose to write about these particular controversies does not always mean that I am taking a side. I just want to let people know what is being said.

Previous in Blog: The Adirondack Wind Energy Park   Next in Blog: CR4 Behind the Scenes
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







10 comments

A Fly on the Wall

Posted August 16, 2007 12:00 AM

The next time you grab your fly-swatter, look closely before you attack. You may be swatting at a robot. Professor Robert Wood of Harvard University and a team of engineers have created a life-size, flying, robotic fly. Their Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) is a faux insect that physically resembles its real-life archetype. The ability to create the intricate details of this robotic fly is attributed to advances in microelectromechanical systems (MEMS).

The Micromechanical Flying Insect (MFI) project began in 1998 and was concentrated on understanding the natural, fluid flight of real flies. Unlike "typical" robots, the robotic fly is neither large, nor slow, nor heavy; in fact, the robotic fly is the same size as a real fly. It weighs in at 60 mm and has a wingspan of 3 cm. Its small size allows the robotic fly to flap its wings at 150 beats a second. Made of polyester and stainless steel struts, the fly's wings have even been reinforced with carbon fiber joints to prevent breakage. As of the beginning of this month, the robotic fly is able to move up and down. There are plans to incorporate an onboard battery, flight controller, power source, and sensors for the miniature robot to successfully move in all directions.

The U.S. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is supporting the Micro Air Vehicle (MAV) project for applications in military surveillance. It has even been suggested that the robotic fly could land on enemies and leave electronic tags for easy targeting. DARPA has expressed an interest in developing MAVs with a flying range of 6.2 miles (10 km), the ability to fly day or night, and an ideal speed of 22 to 45 mph (35.4 to 72.4 kph).

Engineers and researchers believe that the robotic fly can be used for many other purposes, such as search and rescue operations, gathering weather information, detection of chemical and radiological substances, traffic monitoring, wildlife surveys, power-line inspections, aerial photography, or surveillance.

When this technology is complete, I ask:

  • Will the government be able to monitor their own use of surveillance devices?
  • Who are our "enemies"?
  • How much will this technology cost?
  • Where will the money come from?
  • What's next?

Resources:

http://science.howstuffworks.com/spy-fly4.htm

http://blog.scifi.com/tech/archives/2007/07/30/flying_robots_s.html

http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2002/06/fearing/story2.html

http://www.tfot.info/pod/267/Robotic-Fly-Takes-Off.html

http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/19068/page2/

http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=516799

http://www.engadget.com/2007/07/19/harvard-universitys-robotic-fly-takes-flight/

http://www.htlounge.net/articles/3795/1/Robotic-Fly-Helps-Military-Surveillance


Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Posts: 114
Good Answers: 2
#1

Re: A Fly on the Wall

08/17/2007 12:02 AM

My robotic fly-swatter will deal with it. Bring it on.

__________________
Analogies are like something else.
Power-User
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 258
Good Answers: 4
#2

Re: A Fly on the Wall

08/17/2007 3:10 PM

another cool gadget with no onboard power supply. someone please tell me there is an uber-powerful battery the size of a mouse turd SOMEWHERE in the pipeline!

-A-

__________________
question everything
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Knoxville, Tn
Posts: 114
Good Answers: 2
#3
In reply to #2

Re: A Fly on the Wall

08/17/2007 9:57 PM

Of course there is a power supply.

__________________
Analogies are like something else.
Guest
#8
In reply to #3

Re: A Fly on the Wall

10/07/2007 6:39 AM

a very interesting and resech going on the work out ..

but working with it gives more information

sir a brief jist can be sent to me .

Off Topic (Score 5)
Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
#4

Re: A Fly on the Wall

08/18/2007 1:22 PM

no matter how people construct technology, and no matter how good thier wills and intentions, the government will always use it for thier own gain.

Score 1 for Good Answer
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Callifornia coast
Posts: 16
Good Answers: 1
#5

Hay, how about Fly-paper on the Wall

08/21/2007 9:31 PM

I found this today, a paper battery, using carbon nanotubes.

for the short version:
http://nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=109868&org=olpa&from=home

For the longer version:
http://news.rpi.edu/update.do?artcenterkey=2280

I don't know about you but I already thought of some very cool uses for such a thing.
The really neat thing about the stuff is that it would be rechargeable; so they say.

__________________
There is nothing better than a Synchro-link
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 2716
Good Answers: 12
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Hay, how about Fly-paper on the Wall

08/22/2007 8:05 AM

I am always amazed at the advances society has made in technology. Paper batteries... now that is awesome. I can definitely think of a few things that this could be used for, including the robotic fly... I wonder if the military knows about this.

__________________
"Don't be afraid to let your colors shine." - Ween
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Callifornia coast
Posts: 16
Good Answers: 1
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Hay, how about Fly-paper on the Wall

08/22/2007 2:06 PM

What do you think the US government has a patent office? It's not because the US Constitution says we can protect our property, (as in intellectual property.)
Did you know that if the military wants to, they can stop an inventor from doing anything with an invention, just so others won't have it, just for the sake of national security.

Like what good is an invention to an inventor if their mail box doesn't work or if their phone doesn't either?
In fact, even if the military knows of a better technology,than what it has already, it doesn't mean the military will necessarily use it; because it's all about defense contracts. I know this because my own invention is much better than a hook-lift, but the military still uses them.

__________________
There is nothing better than a Synchro-link
Guest
#9

Re: A Fly on the Wall

11/19/2007 7:20 PM

Why would they make a small robot, disguised as a fly, for the use of anything other than spying?

Guest
#10

Re: A Fly on the Wall

02/17/2009 5:11 AM

OMG,

The entire robotics programme is dogged by controversies. It is felt that for a robotic killer or robotic soldier to be a reality more needs to be done in AI and controls field. Even Japan has not been successful in making a robot gun and the experts in India have come as far as building anti-terrorist robot which works on a differential gear. This is important since a bomb needs to be diffused carefully. Like Nostradamus said there would be no peace for 27 years, and the indians will vow to keep fighting more and more powerful enemies.

Bond

10 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

-A- (1), Guest (3), palinurus (2), serpantin (1), Sharkles (1), sunnyside (2)

Previous in Blog: The Adirondack Wind Energy Park   Next in Blog: CR4 Behind the Scenes
You might be interested in: Fly Cutters, Robotic End Effectors, Voice Coil Actuators and Motors