Login | Register

Relativity and Cosmology

This is a Blog on relativity and cosmology for engineers and the like. You are welcome to comment upon or question anything said on my website (http://www.relativity-4-engineers.com), in the eBook or in the snippets I post here.

Comments/questions of a general nature should preferably be posted to the FAQ section of this Blog (http://cr4.globalspec.com/blogentry/316/Relativity-Cosmology-FAQ).

A complete index to the Relativity and Cosmology Blog can be viewed here: http://cr4.globalspec.com/blog/browse/22/Relativity-and-Cosmology"

Regards, Jorrie

Previous in Blog: Tidal Prediction Part 3   Next in Blog: 'Paradoxes' of Relativity Part 2A: The Twin Paradox
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







5 comments

'Paradoxes' of Relativity Part 1: The Sagnac Effect

Posted December 10, 2006 11:00 PM by Jorrie

The Sagnac effect is observed when coherent light travels around a closed loop in opposite directions and the phases of the two signals are compared at a detector. At the source and detector, a half-silvered mirror is usually employed so that half of the source's transmission travels one way around the device and half the other way, with both beams ending up at the same detector again, as in a) and b) below.

If the device is rotated in the plane of the light paths, there will be a phase shift between the two beams, normally showing up as a shift in interference fringes at the detector. This phase shift is sometimes used as an argument against Einstein's theory of relativity. It is said that light does not have the same velocity relative to the apparatus in the two opposing directions around the loop, as "required by relativity".

The answer is that relativity requires no such thing for rotating frames of reference. The solution is fairly obvious in the exaggerated rotation shown in c) and d) below:

In the inertial frame in which the center of the loop is at rest, the two beams clearly do not travel the same distances and will take different amounts of time to traverse the loop. The speed of light in the inertial frame will be identical in both directions. The same effect can be observed on Earth by sending radio signals via satellites around Earth in directions with and against Earth's rotation.

The Sagnac effect is not relativistic in nature, because one needs only small rotational velocities to observe it. When the perimeter velocities become large, the situation changes somewhat due to time dilation and Lorentz contraction, but the general result is the same.

Read a more complete treatment here.


Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guest
#1

Re: 'Paradoxes' of Relativity Part 1: The Sagnac Effect

12/12/2006 11:59 AM

Hello! This is and was interesting to me. I am not a physicist and this sort of thing interests me to no end. Let me think up another experiment. We are in a lab. You are on one photon and I am on another. We both are in a coherent light beam side by side. Sam the lab tech sends our beam of light into a splitter. You are riding on one photon going one way while I am split off riding the photon going the other way. We bounce off a series of mirrors arranged in a circle so to speak and we each hit every mirror in the same place, just going in opposite directions. We meet at the point where we were split apart and pass each other. What is the combined passing or collision speed? What would Sam see? Would the see two photons passing each other at the speed of light or double that speed. If only at the speed of light where does the extra velocity go?

As you can see I know nothing about this sort of thing but sure am interested!

mayf, way off and far out in pahrump

Guest
#2
In reply to #1

Re: 'Paradoxes' of Relativity Part 1: The Sagnac Effect

12/12/2006 4:02 PM

Who is SAM? from the perspective of an outside observer the collision speed would be 2x the speed of light, from the perspective of either person on the photon the collision would be at the speed of light but the incoming photon would be blue shifted alot. There is no extra velocity, the velocity is relative to the observer, as is the frequnecy of the approaching photon.

Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: 25.9S, 28.1E
Posts: 2623
Good Answers: 12
#3
In reply to #1

Re: 'Paradoxes' of Relativity Part 1: The Sagnac Effect

12/13/2006 2:00 AM

Guest1, you asked: "What would Sam see? Would the see two photons passing each other at the speed of light or double that speed. If only at the speed of light where does the extra velocity go?"

I assume Sam is an laboratory observer. Sam cannot measure the relative speed between the two photons. He can measure each photon's speed and then add them using the relativistic addition of velocity rule:

v =(v1 + v2)/(1 + v1v2/c2)

Plug in v1 = c and v2 = c and we have v = c. So where did the "extra velocity" go? It's there, Sam just cannot measure it!

Photons cannot measure speed, but say we have two observers traveling past each other in opposite directions, each at 0.99c, both relative to Sam's laboratory (the reference) frame. Can you work out how fast the one observer would measure the other? Where did the 'lost' velocity go here?

__________________
"Curiosity has its own reason for existence" -- Albert Einstein
Associate
Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The high plains of Colorado
Posts: 34
Good Answers: 1
#4
In reply to #3

Re: 'Paradoxes' of Relativity Part 1: The Sagnac Effect

07/26/2009 3:05 PM

I know this reply is almost 3 years after the fact, but does the relativistic addition of velocity hold true for all speeds or only ones near the speed of light? I understand that the effect is negligable, but is it still considered scientifically true? Also, if the two beams of light are directed at each other is the "true" closing speed between them 2c and c is the "observed" speed or are they physically approaching each other and only the speed of light.

Sorry, I generally understand all the concepts that you talk about, but its a whole other battle getting myself to believe or accept them fully.

Dan

Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: 25.9S, 28.1E
Posts: 2623
Good Answers: 12
#5
In reply to #4

Re: 'Paradoxes' of Relativity Part 1: The Sagnac Effect

07/26/2009 10:29 PM

Hi Dan,

No problem - these threads are not time limited (for as long as the authors live and CR4 exists!).

The relativistic addition of speeds rule holds for all speeds, as far as can be established. It must, otherwise Special Relativity (SR) must be wrong - so far it has withstood 100+ years of testing with flying colors, so what reason do we have to doubt it?

'True closing speed' is meaningless, since speed is a coordinate dependent concept (coordinate distance traveled divided by coordinate time elapsed). Every inertial observer measure a different coordinate distance and time and hence a different speed for the same object - except for light, where the coordinate differences 'cancel out' and every inertial observer get the same speed for light.

Einstein's relativity is concerned with what is observed (and measurable) and how they relate. It tells us little (if anything) about the 'true nature' of light or gravity.

-J

__________________
"Curiosity has its own reason for existence" -- Albert Einstein
5 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

danman285 (1), Guest (2), Jorrie (2)

Previous in Blog: Tidal Prediction Part 3   Next in Blog: 'Paradoxes' of Relativity Part 2A: The Twin Paradox
You might be interested in: Diacs, Video Cameras, Triacs