|
"It's the battery, esteemed colleague!", was the thought I had recently when I heard some engineering department folks I work with talking about the diversity of new electric and hybrid car technologies appearing on the market, via a number of companies, both large (and very much in the news) and small.

It's tough to get those slogans from that last election out of my head. But now it's time that rubber meets the road, when it comes to making some of the election rhetoric come true, if you'll pardon the pun.
Image at right: 1920 Detroit Edison Advertisement -->
With so many tax dollars on the line, I decided to blog on the topic of battery technologies that may or may not be deserving of the public's investment.
Each week, I'll present one new battery technology, and I'm hoping for your comments about what you think of that technology, or for comments on a technology I might want to write about in a following week's installment.
Materials sourcing, end-of-life/recycling issues, number of miles/meters per charge, how the battery performs in an accident, government and industry approvals, how mature the technology is at the moment, are all issues I can think of as factors.
From my point of view, it doesn't matter so much where the technology is developed (for example, sodium batteries from Think! in Norway) - I care mostly about whether it is the technical "best-in-breed", and whether the technology will assist the U.S. (and other countries trying to do the same thing) in its goal of energy independence and getting off the oil.
So, all you fans of the Tappet Brothers, what is your favorite candidate battery?
Looking forward to presenting the first technology next week.
- Larry
Resources:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97295913
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit_Electric
|
Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers: