Login | Register


Alternative & Renewable Energy Blog

The Alternative & Renewable Energy Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about solar power; fuel cells and hydrogen cells; biofuels such as ethanol; wind, water and geothermal energy; and anything else related to renewable power generation. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations. This blog is inspired by the Alternative & Renewable Energy newsletter from GlobalSpec, which you can subscribe to here.

Previous in Blog: Conservation Chronometrics Controversy   Next in Blog: Which Way, Battery? (Part 2: Ni-MH)
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







9 comments

Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

Posted December 08, 2008 9:08 AM by april05

"It's the battery, esteemed colleague!", was the thought I had recently when I heard some engineering department folks I work with talking about the diversity of new electric and hybrid car technologies appearing on the market, via a number of companies, both large (and very much in the news) and small.

It's tough to get those slogans from that last election out of my head. But now it's time that rubber meets the road, when it comes to making some of the election rhetoric come true, if you'll pardon the pun.

Image at right: 1920 Detroit Edison Advertisement -->

With so many tax dollars on the line, I decided to blog on the topic of battery technologies that may or may not be deserving of the public's investment.

Each week, I'll present one new battery technology, and I'm hoping for your comments about what you think of that technology, or for comments on a technology I might want to write about in a following week's installment.

Materials sourcing, end-of-life/recycling issues, number of miles/meters per charge, how the battery performs in an accident, government and industry approvals, how mature the technology is at the moment, are all issues I can think of as factors.

From my point of view, it doesn't matter so much where the technology is developed (for example, sodium batteries from Think! in Norway) - I care mostly about whether it is the technical "best-in-breed", and whether the technology will assist the U.S. (and other countries trying to do the same thing) in its goal of energy independence and getting off the oil.

So, all you fans of the Tappet Brothers, what is your favorite candidate battery?

Looking forward to presenting the first technology next week.

- Larry

Resources:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=97295913

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detroit_Electric


Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Piney Flats, Tennessee
Posts: 1576
Good Answers: 20
#1

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/09/2008 2:37 AM

Electric cars can be made using as little as 59 parts total.

That means a lot of people in a lot of businesses we not have jobs.

The usa needs to make electric cars but also dive deep into robotics !

__________________
If you never do anything you never have problems.
Guest
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/09/2008 11:46 AM

Hmm, but wouldn't electric car and robotics mean even fewer unskilled labor jobs would be available in the auto industry

Guru

Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sebring, Florida
Posts: 849
Good Answers: 22
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/09/2008 3:09 PM

Maybe it is high time we redefine unskilled labor and make adjustments to the work week {fewer hours} balance the pay scale over the entire employee/employment sector of this nation as a whole and do it without continuing the march to socialism. less hrs worked means more people working to accomplish the same means less employee stress, more time to spend with families, more opportunity to help children with studies, leading to an opportunity to reduce delinquencies, and so on. When we farmed with mules, even the mules got winters off from the plow.

TMF

__________________
The only problem with common sense, is that not very many people have it, or know how or when to use it.
Power-User
Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 420
Good Answers: 18
#4

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/09/2008 5:31 PM

A number of years ago I used to work in the same building as Lew Urry very quiet and reserved guy. I can't say I ever talked with him much other than to say hi in the hallway, but he was highly regarded in the company. We would always joke that when he started with the company his first job was to chase the dinosaurs out of the parking lot.

Power-User
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - BSME Clarkson University 1992 Engineering Fields - Software Engineering - BSME Clarkson University 1992 Fans of Old Computers - Commodore 64 - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 346
Good Answers: 3
#7
In reply to #4

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/10/2008 8:51 AM

Hi frankd20 - Many thanks for sharing about Mr. Urry, who, according to Wikipedia, invented both the alkaline and lithium batteries while working for Eveready company (Energizer's former name). It must have been inspiring to have someone like him working nearby!

Seems like he grappled with many of the same problems modern-day engineers/researchers are tackling: battery life-span, production cost, power yield, getting the optimal mix of materials. My long-running Hess Christmas-gift toy gas-trucks of the late 60's/ early 70's likely owe him a debt of gratitude. :)

- Larry

__________________
Follow Larry Kelley --- on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Larry_Kelley --- and on CR4: http://cr4.globalspec.com/search/sitesearch?do=show&us=15248&srchobjs=t,be
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 3990
Good Answers: 188
#5

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/09/2008 9:37 PM

The various lithium technologies are obvious candidates to write about, but there are more interesting stories.

NiMh batteries work remarkable well in the Toyota RAV4 EV, going as far as 300,000 miles in Toyota's tests, and 150,000 in many customer vehicles. As installed in the RAV4 EV, range was 80-120 miles, which is adequate for many uses. (They have also worked very well in the Prius and other hybrids.) But the interesting part is that Texaco, (now Chevron) owns the rights for large format batteries, and successfully sued Panasonic (Toyoto's supplier) to prevent them from continuing manufacture of the batteries. They apparently really don't want competition for gasoline. Has the makings of a good conspiracy story.

The EEstor is another good story, with a certain amount of intrigue. The EEstor people received Kleiner Perkins (the world's largest VC firm, I'd guess) money to start up, so there was some credibility there. But then they hooked up with an unknown neighborhood vehicle maker in Canada for distribution for all cars under 3500 lb (I think that's the figure). How strange to pick a tiny company with no history of making any highway capable vehicles (not even a prototype of one) to distribute a "battery" that would change to world of automobiles, if the hype were to be believed. This "battery" is really a supercapacitor, and is said to have both very high power density and very high energy density -- so high that a 300 lb unit could give hundreds of miles of range, yet could be recharged in just a few minutes, given a high voltage, high amperage charging station (480 VAC at about 600 amps would provide fairly fast charging: 29 kWh in six minutes, for example). The wonders never cease with EEstor, with a long standing claim to go right into production without prototypes, (imagine not testing a 3200V device extremely thoroughly before firing up [or even finalizing design of] an assembly line.)

We don't talk about lead acid anymore, but Firefly is making a lightweight one, and there might be an interesting story there, too.

In the last ten years, there has been virtually no development of note in the other parts of electric cars, largely because the other parts already work so well: 98% efficient controllers, 94% efficient motors... what's not to like? The batteries are the hurdle, or the perceived hurdle... although NiMH are pretty good, although still heavier than we'd like.

Then there are all the other technologies... lots of grist for the mill.

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - BSME Clarkson University 1992 Engineering Fields - Software Engineering - BSME Clarkson University 1992 Fans of Old Computers - Commodore 64 - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 346
Good Answers: 3
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/10/2008 8:35 AM

Hi Ken,

Many thanks for sharing so much on the technologies, history and some of the key players. Nice material for me to take inspiration from for next week. Gave your posting a "Good Answer".

Checked-out your CR4 profile: I'm a fan of your town, Atlanta - was there for COMDEX during the late 90's - beautiful city, great weather and restaurants - enjoyed walking around town. Will check out the jazz scene you're fond of next time I'm down. :)

- Larry

__________________
Follow Larry Kelley --- on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Larry_Kelley --- and on CR4: http://cr4.globalspec.com/search/sitesearch?do=show&us=15248&srchobjs=t,be
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Queensland Coalfields Australia.
Posts: 548
Good Answers: 3
#9
In reply to #5

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/16/2008 2:09 AM

Another great post Ken,

Have you thought of having your car prototype featured on the BBC show Top Gear?

I'm sure that Jeremy Clarkson would love hooning around inside the BBC newsrooms with it like he did with the 1950s version from the Isle of Man.

Off Topic (Score 4)
Power-User
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - BSME Clarkson University 1992 Engineering Fields - Software Engineering - BSME Clarkson University 1992 Fans of Old Computers - Commodore 64 - New Member

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 346
Good Answers: 3
#8

Re: Which Way, Battery? (Part 1)

12/15/2008 2:34 PM

Author's note: Part 2 is now available: click here.

__________________
Follow Larry Kelley --- on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Larry_Kelley --- and on CR4: http://cr4.globalspec.com/search/sitesearch?do=show&us=15248&srchobjs=t,be
9 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

april05 (3), Blink (1), dadw5boys (1), Emjay4119 (1), frankd20 (1), Guest (1), Toomuchfun (1)

Previous in Blog: Conservation Chronometrics Controversy   Next in Blog: Which Way, Battery? (Part 2: Ni-MH)
You might be interested in: Transistors, All Types, Industrial Batteries, All Types, Handheld and Portable Computers