|
When you buy new equipment, do you factor its energy efficiency into your total lifecycle costs? Varying efficiencies make drastic differences environmentally and cost a lot of money, while going un-noticed.
As an example, one manufacturer had a $10,000 100HP motor on their plant floor, designed for 94% efficiency.
If they were paying ~$0.10/kwh, that $10,000 motor should cost over $300,000 in energy over a five year life expectancy if running at 94% energy efficiency. The bad news was, we tested it, and that motor was running at <50% energy efficiency, costing them over $600,000/year to run that one motor, and they didn't know it.
So what happened? Continued here.
This month's blog brought to you by Why?
What do other engineers think of this?
See for yourself at
CR4 -- GlobalSpec's Engineering Community.
|