Login | Register


Drives Blog

The Drives Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about Drive Advances & Applications; AC & DC Motor Drives; Drive Tools & Technology; Drives for Motion Control. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations. This blog is inspired by the Drives newsletter from GlobalSpec, which you can subscribe to here.

Previous in Blog: Fuel Mandates Are the Root of Automakers' Problems   Next in Blog: $2-a-Gallon Gas? Not For Long
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







2 comments

Let the Machine Builder Decide

Posted January 27, 2009 8:18 AM

Machine builders need to produce their products as effectively as they can, and as time goes on, software becomes a more dominant part of the intellectual property. Therefore when it comes to drives and controls, it should be the machine builder, and not the end user, who decides which brand and product to use. He should not be tied down by an end user who specifies a particular make of control equipment. Besides, aren't most systems open architecture anyway?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Drives, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Drives today.


Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electromechanical Engineering - Technical Services Manager Canada - Member - Army brat Popular Science - Cosmology - What is Time and what is Energy? Technical Fields - Architecture - Draftsperson

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1729
Good Answers: 49
#1

Re: Let the Machine Builder Decide

02/19/2009 10:14 PM

No, No, and No.

The entire purpose is to create something that the end user wants, needs, and finds valuable. thats why they give you their money. What good is intellectual property if no one buys it?

The customer as always right, and is always going to buy that which meets their needs, so it will be the customer who decides. Even in the days when there was only one car manufacturer, and the only color was black, the customer demanded and demanded until they got their way. choice.

No, most systems are not open architecture, not in software, not in controls, not even in measuring systems or fasteners.

Guru
Hobbies - CNC - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 3048
Good Answers: 28
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Let the Machine Builder Decide

03/14/2009 11:28 AM

No, most systems are not open architecture, not in software, not in controls, not even in measuring systems or fasteners.

Some systems are proprietary. I can give an example. Flow International which manufactures High Pressure Water Jets, has proprietary software to operate their machines which they try to sell, salesmen would even go as far as saying the machines don't run on convention G-Code. THAT IS FALSE.

They (FLOW INT.) are finding that, it may be worth the while to adapt to the customers infrastructure, At a cost, of course. Which I agree, although this can have exceptions.

phoenix911

__________________
They say that there is only one universal language that everybody can understand and that is mathematics. I like to think there are two, with the other being humor.
2 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Previous in Blog: Fuel Mandates Are the Root of Automakers' Problems   Next in Blog: $2-a-Gallon Gas? Not For Long
You might be interested in: Fieldbus Products, Distributed Control Systems (DCS), Application Service Providers