Login | Register


Scientific Instruments

The Scientific Instruments Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about Spectroscopy & Chromatography; Microscopy & Imaging; Indsutrial Applications; Metrology & Calibration. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations. This blog is inspired by the Scientific Instruments newsletter from GlobalSpec, which you can subscribe to here.

Previous in Blog: Will Washington Pay For Science?   Next in Blog: Can We Really Catch Dopers?
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







2 comments

More of a Good Thing? Or Just More?

Posted March 04, 2009 8:35 AM

One of the biggest names in science publishing, Nature, launched another journal, Nature Chemistry. The first issue (April 2009) is preceded by online publication of papers (starting March 20). The editors say, Nature Chemistry is dedicated to publishing high-quality papers that describe the most significant and cutting-edge research in all areas of chemistry, as well as covering the impact of chemistry beyond the laboratory. Is a new journal another venue for publishing important research, or yet another subscription fee for already over-taxed research libraries?

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Scientific Instruments, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Scientific Instruments today.


Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Netherlands - Member - New Member Fans of Old Computers - Commodore 64 - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 1717
Good Answers: 11
#1

Re: More of a Good Thing? Or Just More?

03/04/2009 11:06 PM

I usually read the scientific American

, but i would be interested in a Nature Babes magazine

__________________
From the Movie "The Big Lebowski" Don't pee on the carpet man!
Guest
#2

Re: More of a Good Thing? Or Just More?

03/05/2009 3:31 AM

More.

Every journal claims to publish to most high-quality research. If a new journal doesn't come up, the same high-quality research will just appear in other journals.

The only added value journals have to justify their price is their peer review (done for free by other authors). Considering that 'stricter' is not 'better', and that peer review is a non-transparent process that doesn't get published, the only way I can find out is by sending an article for publication and witness the quality or review.

Alas, I am not a chemist. Therefore I shall never know.

Generally speaking, I'd love to someday see the obvious: That scientific research dissemination, reviewed for free anyway, becomes free. With the internet and word-processor templates having rendered editors largely redundant, the only (powerful) thing standing in the way is inertia + personal/ corporate interest.

2 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Previous in Blog: Will Washington Pay For Science?   Next in Blog: Can We Really Catch Dopers?
You might be interested in: Trade Journals, Books and Technical Publications, PIN Diodes, Publishing Software