Login | Register
The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion®


Engineering...Beyond the Classroom

The Engineering...Beyond the Classrom Blog is focused on engineering issues that are important to students and faculty in an educational setting. This is the place for conversation and discussion about technologies to watch, tools of the trade, parts & assembly and problems & solutions. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Shakespeare(theEngineer) Resurrected   Next in Blog: Computer Monitoring Software in the Classroom: Big Brother or Big Improvement? (Part 2)
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







4 comments

Computer Monitoring Software in the Classroom: Big Brother or Big Improvement? (Part 1)

Posted July 22, 2009 7:30 AM by ShakespeareTheEngineer

Last summer, I posed a question about whether Internet filters in schools were a foolish way to teach students about making responsible choices. At the time, I stated that blocking students wasn't a proactive way of dealing with online behavior. Rather, it was reactive and lessened opportunities for students to learn to use the Internet responsibly. After all, if you never take off the training wheels, how do you know that you can really ride a bike?

Not Ideal and Most Non-Functional

Obviously, it's a very poor idea to give students free reign to surf the Web, or run whatever programs they like on their workstations. But Internet filters are unreliable. They either block sites that students need to visit (e.g., science students can't access the Mayo Clinic's studies on the prevalence of breast cancer), or are easy to circumvent via proxy sites that some students are all too eager to find when they should be doing their homework.

Even with a teacher in the classroom, unfiltered Internet and computer usage is not a great idea. If a teacher is in front of the room talking to a student, who knows what is on a screen in the back of the room? Take a step in a student's direction, and the teacher will find that the student has closed the screen of whatever was appropriate.

Finding a Better Way

In the past year, I've had an opportunity to learn how to use a piece of software that might move the debate in the right direction. While there are many different applications available, I learned how to use a program called NetSupport School. It's a comprehensive monitoring and instructional tool that allows a teacher – from his or her own station and in real time - to see what students are doing on their workstations. Although I've only begun to scratch the surface of what schools can do with this software, let me share what I learned from using it during the spring semester of the last school year.

NetSupport School allows teachers to open a window that shows you the screen of every student in the room. Each window updates every 1.5 seconds or so. If you mouse over one of the windows, it enlarges so you can get a better look. Double-click on a student and his or her screen becomes the size of your screen. You also have "takeover power" in this mode, allowing you to manipulate a student's mouse and keyboard from your own station.

Tired of students surfing while you're explaining a point? With one click, you can shut-off all of their monitors until you're finished. You can also deny all Web access or restrict it to certain sites that you (and not some Internet filter) approve. So, if you're giving a written final exam, this let's you prevent students from going places that they shouldn't while directing them to content that you trust.

Part 2 of this two-part series, highlighting some of the other feature beyond simple monitoring, will run next week.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1235
Good Answers: 38
#1

Re: Computer Monitoring Software in the Classroom: Big Brother or Big Improvement? (Part 1)

07/22/2009 9:04 AM

Most of the time you do not need to know which students are not paying attention. Perhaps this is a step in the right direction, but no matter how much you force students to learn (even by turning off their monitors), it does not mean that they will. Students are finicky and I could see resentment being a big issue.

I remember being in computer labs and not always paying attention or doing as I was told. If someone then turned off my monitor, I would be even more resilient to pay attention. If they get the job done, I figure don't worry about their work ethic. But if they are only a few that are underachieving and not paying attention, perhaps selective monitor turn off would be more appealing?

Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Education - Seasoned Vet in the Classroom United States - Member -

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 761
Good Answers: 19
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Computer Monitoring Software in the Classroom: Big Brother or Big Improvement? (Part 1)

07/22/2009 9:25 AM

Which is the nice part of this particular software. You can target as many or as few as you need to.

Sometimes I will just lock it up (a big padlock comes on the screen) and then allow a student to present his or her case. Depends what kind of mood I am in, I guess.

It does bring up an interesting debate, though. At what point is a student responsible for his or her own work? The boss is still responsible for his or her employees productivity, but the upside is that unlike school, you can fire an employee if he or she is slacking off.

Is that point when they make it to high school, or at the start of their senior year? I have had parents who have told me they are done with their kids as young as 13 and ones who have tried to turn in work for their kids into July with the notion that the child should have an extension because the parents weren't informed of the student's grade often enough. At what point do the training wheels come off in American education?

Personally, I think I would like to see that earlier than later. In many cases, even though failure rates may go up initially, I think we would foster more independent people instead of the "Boomerang Children" who are 29 and still living with their parents. It would take some time for a culture shift to happen, but what we have now is a generation of individuals who often blame others for their failures and expect to be rewarded no matter the quality of their product. Before I get revved up on entitlement, I will move along.

__________________
StE - "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer/Hoist with his own petard" -Hamlet Act III, scene 4, 202–209
Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 68
Good Answers: 2
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Computer Monitoring Software in the Classroom: Big Brother or Big Improvement? (Part 1)

07/22/2009 10:37 AM

While this type of software does seem a bit "Big Brother is watching you" I would have loved it when I was teaching a computer-based after school program a few years ago. Just knowing that your teacher can see what you're up to online should deter some kids from visiting inappropriate sites.

There were too many times that I would walk around the room and see MySpace pages or music videos... and when I told them to close the window and get back to their schoolwork, they'd just minimize the window (yeah, I never fell for that).

In your experience with this software, Shakespeare, did you find that there were still some kids that would slack off, even if you curtailed their online activities time and time again?

Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Education - Seasoned Vet in the Classroom United States - Member -

Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Troy, NY
Posts: 761
Good Answers: 19
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Computer Monitoring Software in the Classroom: Big Brother or Big Improvement? (Part 1)

07/22/2009 10:57 AM

At first, yes, but I was SHOCKED with how quickly they stepped up and stayed focused once word was out as to what I could do.

Some students will always slack. I had a few who would open a Microsoft word document, paste in some text so it looked like they were doing work if I just scanned the desktop and then used their iPhones instead.

At some point, you need to let students be in charge of their own destiny. Besides one case where I took over the computer of a girl (who was turned sideways and texting on her phone) and posted a blog - which, of course, looked like it came from her - saying that I was the most important person to walk the Earth in her opinion, I just let those kids be.

It is like that saying that locks keep honest people honest. This made a big difference for the fringe kid and the average kid that just need some help staying focused to reach closer to their potential. The really dedicated ones didn't REALLY need it and the ones who wanted to do nothing continued to find a way to make it happen.

I was very impressed with the time-on-task increase for 90-95% if my students and I think they were happy to leave the room with less or no homework because of the increased focus.

__________________
StE - "For 'tis the sport to have the enginer/Hoist with his own petard" -Hamlet Act III, scene 4, 202–209
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 4 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Jaxy (1); Mello (1); ShakespeareTheEngineer (2)

Previous in Blog: Shakespeare(theEngineer) Resurrected   Next in Blog: Computer Monitoring Software in the Classroom: Big Brother or Big Improvement? (Part 2)
You might be interested in: Touch Screen Sensors, Touch Screen Displays, Touch Screen Controllers