Login | Register

Previous in Forum: Calculating Structural Forces in Building Construction   Next in Forum: Solid Carbide Cutting Tools and CNC Tool Holders
Close

Comments Format:






Close

Subscribe to Discussion:

CR4 allows you to "subscribe" to a discussion
so that you can be notified of new comments to
the discussion via email.

Close

Rating Vote:







2 comments
Guest

Bently Nevada 3500 Vibration Monitoring System

05/08/2008 1:52 AM

Please be informed that we were using Bently Nevada 7200 Vibration System and CSI 2115 Portable Analyzer. All the times their reading were matched. Now we replace the old 7200 by rack 3500 Bently Nevada and the Turbine Burings Vibration Reading is Not Matched. Between rack3500 and CSI2115.

Send to a friend Digg this Add to del.icio.us
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Guru
United States - Member - Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Malaysia - Member - Why don't you knock it off with them negative waves? Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - Why don't you say something righteous and hopeful for a change? Engineering Fields - Instrumentation Engineering - Vibration guy Hobbies - Musician - Wannabe Guitar Hero

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In Houston Texas, finalizing my transfer to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 3°10'36.60"N 101°40'15.58"E
Posts: 1097
Good Answers: 36
#1

Re: BENTLY NEVADA 3500 VERSUS CSI 2115

05/08/2008 7:43 AM

You need to give a bit more detail on the problem. First of all are you measuring proximity probe channels off the BNC connectors? Or are you comparing a casing reading with the CSI accel with a BNC reading. The two instruments process accel and velocity signals very differently.

Second, what units are you using? The Bently typically outputs velocity in in/sec 0-pk while the CSI may use RMS.

Third, what scale factor are you using? The old Bently 7200 output velocity at 500 mv/ips, while the new 3500 may be set up for 100 mv/ips.

So as you can see I need much more information to help. Also the machine type and frequency span,in addition to the transducer type would be helpfu.

__________________
Veritas vos liberabit....La vérité rend libre..... De waarheid is bevrijdend ..... La verdad te libera....The truth will set you free.
Score 1 for Good Answer
Guest
#2
In reply to #1

Re: BENTLY NEVADA 3500 VERSUS CSI 2115

06/01/2008 12:50 AM

we are measuring proximity probe channels off the BNC connectors. both readings are direct displacement peak-peak

thank you

2 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!

Previous in Forum: Calculating Structural Forces in Building Construction   Next in Forum: Solid Carbide Cutting Tools and CNC Tool Holders
You might be interested in: Vibration Sensors, Vibration Instruments, Piezoelectric Drivers and Piezoelectric Amplifiers