Previous in Forum: USA, Florida Professional Engineer   Next in Forum: petrochemical and refinery info
Close
Close
Close
6 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2

Dynamic Analysis

07/09/2008 9:26 AM

Hi everybody.

I have a question regarding the subject. What is the difference between response spectrum analysis and time history analysis? In the actual world when should i analyze my model using one of them? Thanks in advance.

__________________
Novice
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#1

Re: Dynamic Analysis

07/09/2008 10:38 AM

In radio transmission, spectrum analysis is about looking at the resonance of the circuit [read 'structure'] in response to input frequencies [read 'wind/tide/earthquake'].

Time history analysis sounds like looking at the deterioration of the structure over time.

Does that help?

What do local procedures and Codes of Practice say on the subject?

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 479
Good Answers: 9
#2

Re: Dynamic Analysis

07/09/2008 11:46 AM

The amplitude of the dynamic variable is considered in the "frequency" domain rather than a "time" domain because it is more convenient and useful.

My guess is that the "dynamic analysis" that OP is interested in is either a sound wave or a shock wave (earthquake).

Typically, this would be done to get a nice graph of a log function.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 270
Good Answers: 19
#3

Re: Dynamic Analysis

07/09/2008 3:30 PM

Spectrum analysis takes the input wave forms (as from a Fourier analysis breakdown of earthquake or wind loads over a slice of time) and excites the structure which has a series of natural frequencies. An output amplitude of movement and hence internal forces can be derived. It is the application of input wave to natural frequency.

Time history takes a measurement of a real quake or wind tunnel test over a slice of time and then applies these loads in discrete intervals to the structural model to excite a response.

There is some debate about which is the most effective at predicting the reponse of a structure. The time history method requires significant amounts of computer power and has only been done on a few models for wind loading (although with success as the City of Manchester Stadium shows).

For quake loads, both methods can be used. It probably depends on your available data.

__________________
omw7
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member China - Member - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CHINA
Posts: 2945
Good Answers: 14
#4

Re: Dynamic Analysis

07/09/2008 8:26 PM

oh,

We can say like this, they look like a man and his shadow. you can judge a man's move by his shadow shift. more or less, they are like twists. sometimes, you cannt split them apart.

dynamic analysis is very often seeing in our job. almost in every field cn see it.

machine, electric, themal, etc .

This may owed to Fourier who found the relationship and described in math. refer to #3

earthquake, terrible thing. lets forget it as soon as possible.

give a n other example, vibrication analysis, say impulse response, yo u can entry frequency field to see what happened. use power spectrum you can detect flaw of a car etc.

use it you can analysis a circuit is stable or unstable. too many contents include analog and digital need you learn for a life. in one words, if you can get nothing in time field you hve to find some thing in frequecy field.

go on and study hard.

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2
#5

Re: Dynamic Analysis

07/10/2008 5:51 AM

Thank you for your response sirs.

Presently am studying Staad Pro, and am start pulling my hair bout this dynamics analysis. In response spectrum analysis UBC97 section 1631.5 has recommendation of spectral acceleration versus period. Time history analysis of section 1631.1(UBC 97) shall be performed with pairs of appropriate horizontal ground motion. What are the appropriate ground motion?

__________________
Novice
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Larsen and Toubro Limited Chennai India
Posts: 1
#6

Re: Dynamic Analysis

08/16/2008 5:31 AM

Hello one and all,

A response spectrum function is a list of period versus spectral acceleration values.The acceleration values in the function are assumed to be normalized; that is, the functions themselves are not assumed to have units. Instead the units are associated with a scale factor that multiplies the function and is specified when you define the response spectrum case.

Time-history analysis is a step by step analysis of the dynamical response of a structure to a specified loading that may vary with time. A time history function may be a list of time and function values or just a list of function values that are assumed to occur at equally spaced intervals. The function values in a time history function may be normalized ground acceleration values or they may be multipliers for specified (force or displacement) load cases.

Regards

Deepak S. Bashetty

Larsen & Toubro India

__________________
The perfection of a clock is not to go fast, but to be accurate.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Register to Reply 6 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

bashetty (1); cnpower (1); drift10 (1); omw7 (1); PWSlack (1); user-deleted-9 (1)

Previous in Forum: USA, Florida Professional Engineer   Next in Forum: petrochemical and refinery info

Advertisement