Previous in Forum: Strain Gauge   Next in Forum: Building Quadricylces in Mexico or China
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sour Lake, TX 30°08'59.68"N 94°19'42.81"W
Posts: 675
Good Answers: 13

MEMS Accelerometer

08/16/2008 9:36 AM

There are some semiconductor mems devices that measure acceleration. I have tested two of them and, on both, I have noticed the same problem that bother me.

Imagine that an accelerometer (Ac) has a frequency answer, which can be limited by filtering. Say that that band is limited to 2Hz. Than, the Ac can be used as a tilt sensor, with a pretty good reproducibility of data.

If you have the brilliant idea to use the Ac as a change of tilt sensor, the dc voltage that the Ac outputs will be 2.5V for horizontal position, 3.0V for the tilt of 22° to the right, and 2.0V for the tilt of 22° on the left. You move the Ac about the axis, from extreme left to extreme right position, at a slow speed of 0.5Hz, and you get a signal from 2.0V to 3.0V. On the scope, it looks that the move coincides with the extreme values of the Ac. So the signal is following the move without a noticeable delay or change of the predicted value for the position.

This is in a continuous move (at the above mentioned speed).

If you start from rest, in any position (that means from horizontal, or from extreme right, or from extreme left), if the rest position signal is 2.5V and you move to the right, the signal should increase, gradually to 3.0V, as you tilt to a 22° to the right. Well, for the first 250 millisecond, the signal does not grow more positive. On the contrary, it decreases by a 100mV. In fact imagine a sinusoid starting from 0 and going as the graph of 180° to 360° of a sinusoid goes.

Therefore, the signal decreases when it should increase.

I attributed that to the inertia of the measuring system when starting from rest. It is bothering, because it is not consistent. It happens only when the move starts from rest. If going back and forth, there is not any overlay-ed signal and everything seems smooth.

What is the cause of the different behaviour with respect to inertia (when oscillating, it too changes direction, therefore, inertia is implied)?

__________________
Bridge rule #1: Nobody is as good as he thinks about himself nor as dumb, as his partner thinks...
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4448
Good Answers: 143
#1

Re: MEMS Accelerometer

08/16/2008 11:56 AM

Stiction is a problem seen in some accelerometers. There are models that claim to address this (more cost - surprise!). Contact your sales rep about this.

__________________
"Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally won out over it." Elwood P. Dowd
Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Germany 49° 26' N, 7° 46' O
Posts: 1950
Good Answers: 109
#2

Re: MEMS Accelerometer

08/17/2008 3:04 PM

Hi,

this seems to be a mounting of the accelerometer above the axis of rotation of your tilting device.

By tilting you get a signal from tilt and another signal from the linear acceleration that is necessary to have the linear component of movement.

These are opposite to each other if the accelerometer is mounted above the center of rotation.

If you change the position downwards and test with a fast angular movement of small amplitude you will find the position where only tilt is measured.

RHABE

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sour Lake, TX 30°08'59.68"N 94°19'42.81"W
Posts: 675
Good Answers: 13
#4
In reply to #2

Re: MEMS Accelerometer

08/19/2008 1:24 PM

It makes sense what you say. Please give me some time to digest it, I am caught right now.

Thank you

__________________
Bridge rule #1: Nobody is as good as he thinks about himself nor as dumb, as his partner thinks...
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sour Lake, TX 30°08'59.68"N 94°19'42.81"W
Posts: 675
Good Answers: 13
#7
In reply to #2

Re: MEMS Accelerometer

08/20/2008 1:36 PM

Hi Rhabe,

I have checked the signals with the sensor mounted under the rotation axis. You are absolutely right, the "inertia" signal, for this configuration is subtracting from the signal, not adding. It is, in fact, what I was looking for.

I am sure that if anybody who has met this problem would give you the GA that you deserve.

Thank you

__________________
Bridge rule #1: Nobody is as good as he thinks about himself nor as dumb, as his partner thinks...
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 19
#3

Re: MEMS Accelerometer

08/17/2008 9:34 PM

I have a question. How are you doing the filtering? If you've filtered the output to rolloff at 2 Hz then simple filters will still cause some phase loss at 0.2 Hz. If you go with more complicated filtering I could see the possibility for a 180 deg phase loss.

Just a thought...

__________________
Aerospace Systems Engineer; http://blogs.ControlTheoryPro.com
Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sour Lake, TX 30°08'59.68"N 94°19'42.81"W
Posts: 675
Good Answers: 13
#5
In reply to #3

Re: MEMS Accelerometer

08/19/2008 1:32 PM

For the ADIS16003, Analog Devices recomend a single pole filtering. Their signal is output through a 32K resistor, and with a x uF capacitor, you lower the bandwidth of the response.

With or without that capacitor, the inertia signal at every change of tilt (from rest going up, down, or from going up/down to the oposite) there is this "parasitic" signal. I was able to separate the one apearing after moving from rest. For the one in a continuous move with change of direction, I intend to aply a four pole filter. This will introduce a group delay of 35 to 40 msecond (Chebishev, Bessel). Do you have any schematics for an active filter with a lower group delay, like 10-15 msec?

__________________
Bridge rule #1: Nobody is as good as he thinks about himself nor as dumb, as his partner thinks...
Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 19
#6
In reply to #5

Re: MEMS Accelerometer

08/19/2008 8:12 PM

Nope, sorry. Working in aerospace I usually get the sensor after a vendor has had their way with it. I'm currently working with a sensor whose output is the blended (via filters) of response of 2 other sensors. The input sensors have phase responses that I would expect. The resulting, blended output, does not.

The vendor felt they needed to go with high order filters in order to meet our requirements. I don't dispute that they needed to do it but the high order filters have left the blended sensor with a strange phase response. Including what appear to be 180 deg shifts (probably from all pass filters).

Given what I've seen with this sensor's phase response, I threw out filters as a possibility.

Gabe

__________________
Aerospace Systems Engineer; http://blogs.ControlTheoryPro.com
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 7 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Gabe Spradlin (2); indel (3); RHABE (1); TVP45 (1)

Previous in Forum: Strain Gauge   Next in Forum: Building Quadricylces in Mexico or China

Advertisement