I would like to get some idea from everyone in the forum on what ways you can have a manual process automated. i have an attached image which may help. I can provide you additional details if you need. Thanks a lot.
I don't know about others, but the diagram/picture is too small to read on my display (19").
A lot of things can be automated that are now done manually, and they usually stay that way until an in-house, ambitious engineer/clever-other decides to automate it. Hiring outside consultants to assess the process may cost so much that the savings one would hope to make from the automation stretches out the pay-back period for years, and if the plan they propose isn't feasible, it's money down the tube.
__________________
We have met the enemy and he is us . . . Walt Kelly
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in a pretty, pristine body but rather to come sliding in sideways, all used up and exclaiming, "Wow, what a ride!"
I tried to print it exploded and still could not read it.
If you post something clearer or larger I (we) would like to throw out ideas.
One other thing we will need to know is how many different widget types will be handled and if all the pick up and set down configurations are the same. Are the "targets" at pick up and set down moving. These basic facts will help establish if the system can be done with "hard" automation or something with more degrees of freedom and programmability like an industrial robot. It will also help establish the end effector configuration.
Also what is the average thru put and what does the system need to intermittently sprint to?
Will the end user be able to maintain an industrial robot or at least a PLC controlled manipulator?
__________________
Everything I know about opera I learned from Bugs Bunny
"Almost" Good Answers: