CR4® - The Engineer's Place for News and Discussion®

 Previous in Forum: Neutrinos Probably Have Mass Next in Forum: Asymetric Shipping Costs UK to USA
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2

Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/26/2011 2:44 PM

I have Air flow in Nm^3/hr and oil flow in Kg/hr.

so as to compare them i need to convert them to same units for Furnace application.

I want to convert Nm^3/hr to kg/hr.

Nm^3.here "N" mean at normal conditions at 0 degre temp and at 1 atm pressure.

How do i convert the same and do i NEED TO TAKE ANY TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE into consideration.

For example:

i want to conver the air flow =115 Nm^3/hr into Kg/Hr ?

kindly provide me the steps/formula for conversion.Reply as soon as possible.

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 39896
#1

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/26/2011 2:46 PM
Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Moses Lake, WA, USA, Thulcandra - The Silent Planet (C.S. Lewis)
Posts: 3939
#2

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/26/2011 9:11 PM

I do not know why you want to do this, but the difference lies in the density of the air.

If you want to compare mass flow rates of the oil and the air, you must convert the volumetric flow rate of the air to a mass flow rate. First year engineering stuff.

The density of air at normal conditions is 1.204 kg/m3. Multiply the volumetric flow rate (Nm3/hr) by the normal air density (1.204 kg/m3), and you have your answer:

115 Nm3/hr x 1.204 kg/m3 = 138.46 kg/hr.

Could you be so kind as to tell us why such a simple calculation is so urgent that you could not do it yourself?

__________________
"Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone." - Ayn Rand
Guru

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 1089
#4
In reply to #2

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/26/2011 10:31 PM

Perhaps it's due in tomorrow and "Sir" wont give an extension.

__________________
If there's something you don't understand...Then a wizard did it. As heard on "The Simpsons".
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Moses Lake, WA, USA, Thulcandra - The Silent Planet (C.S. Lewis)
Posts: 3939
#8
In reply to #4

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/27/2011 12:05 AM

I hate homework questions as much as anyone. However, this did not seem as such.

In light of the question and my answer, kindly vote me a Good Answer!

__________________
"Reason is not automatic. Those who deny it cannot be conquered by it. Do not count on them. Leave them alone." - Ayn Rand
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: City of destiny, INDIA
Posts: 775
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/27/2011 5:41 AM

No Sir, I can't give you GA, because it seem you answered in hurry and anger with OP and made it wrong. Density of air at NTP (at 0 deg C and 1 atm pressure) is 1.293 kg/Nm3. So, the right answer is

115 Nm3/hr x 1.293 kg/m3 = 148.7 kg/hr.

Commentator

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between India & Australia
Posts: 71
#3

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/26/2011 10:31 PM

It is a straight conversion, you do not need any pressure or temperature into consideration.

The calculation is:

115 Nm3/hr x 28.95 (MW of air) / 22.414 Nm3 = 148.5 kg/hr

__________________
Continuous Learning
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2
#11
In reply to #3

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/27/2011 5:09 PM

Thanks alot for the reply.

You have cleared my confusion for the Temperature and pressure consideraations.

2
Guru

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Geelong, Australia
Posts: 1089
#5

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/26/2011 10:44 PM

In my official capacity as district pedant I'd like to point out that some of the symbols people are using are confusing (and wrong).

N means Newton (there's probably another symbol used to specify the particular temperature and pressure you mean), it's kg not Kg and I don't know what the MW stands for but it's not MegaWatt.

This is not being fussy, you're trying to clearly and unambiguously explain your thinking so you need to get the details right. Correct use of units, spelling and grammar says something about you as a person and people, perhaps unconsciously, do notice. (And yes, I've probably made a grammatical error in this post)

__________________
If there's something you don't understand...Then a wizard did it. As heard on "The Simpsons".
Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 641
#6
In reply to #5

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/26/2011 11:15 PM

Science is in the details, good answer!

__________________
''What the hell has my a** got to do with magic?" Don Quixote
Score 1 for Off Topic
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 443
#10
In reply to #5

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/27/2011 9:30 AM

I agree that the symbols used can be confusing to those not familiar.

N is the common designation for "normal", which in this case stands for "standard temperature and pressure" or STP. Unfortunately, STP itself has various definitions.

MW stands for molecular weight, as any high school chemistry student can tell you.

Both of these symbols are very commonly used, and were used correctly in this case.

Saying that N "means" Newton is just as wrong as not defining N to begin with. Correcting Kg with kg is just being fussy.

I do agree that symbols should be defined, as they can mean many different things depending on the field, language and culture. However, in this case, the symbols used are very common when dealing with gases, and should be very familiar to anyone who could answer this question.

So the OP has asked a question using widely accepted symbols, which was clearly understood and has been answered. It probably is not important to him that you did not understand.

Guru

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 641
#12
In reply to #10

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/27/2011 5:21 PM

Assumptions in science are just plain wrong, unless you are an evil scientist!

__________________
''What the hell has my a** got to do with magic?" Don Quixote
Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oman
Posts: 612
#7

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/26/2011 11:53 PM

Multiply the volume flow rate ( m3/hr) by density( kg/m3) you will get mass flow rate.(kg/hr).

Power-User

Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 465
#13

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/27/2011 9:24 PM

We shouldn't prolong the continuation of misinterpretation of the definitions of STP and NTP condition, and the value of density at each of the different conditions.

NTP, Normal Temperature and Pressure is air at 20oC (293.15 K and 1 atm (101.325 kN / m2, 101.325 kPa, 30 inches Hg, 760 torr)
NTP dry air has a density of 1.204 kg / m3.

STP, Standard Temperature and Pressure is air at 0oC (273.15 K, and 1 atm (101.325 kN / m2, 101.325 kPa, 30 inches Hg, 760 torr)
STP dry air has a density of 1.292 kg / m3.

Standard sea level atmospheric pressure = 101 325 Pa
Air density, Kg / m3 = [1.2929 X 273.13 X (AP - ( SVP x RH ) / ( T + 273.13)] X 760
Where:
T = oC
AP = Absolute Pressure, mm of Hg

SVP = Saturation Vapour Pressure of air over water at temp T

RH = Relative Humidity (decimal)

and Mikerho, a GA

Guru

Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 641
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/27/2011 10:46 PM

Isn't RH expressed in %? Great disambiguation btw.

__________________
''What the hell has my a** got to do with magic?" Don Quixote
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 443
#15
In reply to #13

Re: Convert Nm^3 to kg/hr

06/28/2011 9:37 AM

Ahh, it would be simple if this were true. I have never heard NTP used here in the states, but Nm^3 is common.

STP is "defined" here in many different ways different ways: STP

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".

Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, rate them!

Users who posted comments:

AussieBob (1); ffej (2); gigaconcept.com (3); lyn (1); Mikerho (2); mrswamy (1); pritam (1); sv13 (1); Tad (2); thakkarmayank24 (1)

 Previous in Forum: Neutrinos Probably Have Mass Next in Forum: Asymetric Shipping Costs UK to USA