Previous in Forum: Fairbanks   Next in Forum: Chinese Railway Signalling Continues to Worry
Close
Close
Close
39 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
Good Answers: 2

Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/02/2011 2:20 PM

Hi, our town is going to well water and will heat the well house with propane. The well house sits over the well. The engineer estimates we will need a 15kW emergency electric generation unit and wants to power this with diesel. It will be in the well house. Myquestion is: Is propane a better alternative? I am wondering about the initial cost of the emergency power supply, the cost to run it for 24 hours and the repurcussions from small medium and large leaks of the fuel tank.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#1

Re: diesel versus propane for emergency power generation for water supply

10/02/2011 3:06 PM

This sounds more like a discussion you should have with your engineer. Diesel fuel will certainly provide more backup time than propane with equivalent size tanks, even if the propane is liquefied. If you are not sure of the cost to benefit of this engineer's proposal it sounds to me that you should get another real bid from another engineering firm for this town project. Cost speculations from people who do not make formal contract bids can make much more grief for you than help.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
Good Answers: 2
#3
In reply to #1

Re: diesel versus propane for emergency power generation for water supply

10/02/2011 7:07 PM

Cost is marginal either way. Is there danger in storing diesel fuel over the town's water supply? Is one more dangerous than the other? Explosions? Car running off the road into the building? Seems as though you have avoided my original questions.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#4
In reply to #3

Re: diesel versus propane for emergency power generation for water supply

10/02/2011 8:02 PM

What about space junk or meteor impact?

On a more serious note, there are dangers in anything and everything that people do. The question should not be are there dangers of each approach but how does one mitigate each danger. If your engineer is not mitigating the dangers of each approach then regardless of the cost, it would be negligent to use this engineer's design.

You must remember though that this is an international discussion site. From the comfort of my home here on Long Island NY, I cannot tell if your town resides in the Serengeti plains of Africa, the tropical rainforest of Borneo, the tundra outside of Vladivostok or (heaven forbid) you are my town supervisor. (Fortunately for me, Long Island resides on one of the largest water aquifers and has for a long time been using solely well water. So you are not my town supervisor.) I have no idea about the hydrology of your well or the plans your engineer has proposed to extract this water for your town. I do see that you seem to expect anonymous absolute strangers that know nothing of your situation or the design presented to you to give you advice that will effect your town. This greatly worries me.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
Good Answers: 2
#5
In reply to #4

Re: diesel versus propane for emergency power generation for water supply

10/02/2011 9:22 PM

Our town lies in a valley in VT. The water supply seems to be an aquifer that lies beneath the whole valley and several towns have tapped into it. It can put out about 1000gal/minute but the system will extract an average of 250 when running and up to 400 if necessary. It is pumped to a storage unit above town and a gravity system is used to feed the pipes. We will be the only town in the state that uses diesel for emergency backup power.

The select board sits on their hands and does whatever the engineer says. While I believe the engineer competent, I allow for human frailty: he is paid by the size of the project and I believe has overengineered other aspects of the project. He didn't know the old well house was built on spongy soil and now the original price to rebuild has grown from $400k to $700k. The soil above the well is clay and I believe the well is about 75' deep.

I am a layman who doesn't want to cost the town money, would like to get an opinion from an engineer for free to possibly save the town money. We are a town of 1900 and have limited resources.

Rather than give me attitude like you are the only person with a brain on this site, just ask me what you need to know to answer my question or not bother if you feel your time is too valuable.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - Been there, done that. Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 15600
Good Answers: 981
#35
In reply to #5

Re: diesel versus propane for emergency power generation for water supply

10/09/2011 8:50 AM

Well you've now been given a collection of opinions on which fuel is better for your town project. As I expected, many people have valid arguments and opinions that support the use of each fuel. Each fuel has it advantages and drawbacks.

One drawback that was missed by our community, that you did ask about, is the added hazard of a leak. A propane leak cannot potentially contaminate the ground water as diesel or gasoline potentially can. It is certainly very easy to mitigate either liquid from reaching the ground with a good design but propane cannot reach the water level itself. However, a propane leak can make a very dangerous hazard. Propane is a flammable gas. So a leak anywhere on the storage container can release all of your backup fuel and at a fairly fast rate. A liquid fuel leak will likely not quickly drain your reserve supply. A common factor that a propane or gasoline leak will have is that both fuels will be very easy to ignite outside of the engine's combustion chamber. Either of these fuels will have concentration levels that will be just flammable or explosive. In contrast, one can drop a lit match into diesel fuel at room temperature and the fuel will extinguish the lit match.

There is no single correct answer which fuel will be best for your town. There are only options with known drawbacks and advantages for each choice. You and those willing members of your town board should discuss which approach will be both cost effective for your town and which risks you are accepting with your choice.

__________________
"Don't disturb my circles." translation of Archimedes last words
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#2

Re: diesel versus propane for emergency power generation for water supply

10/02/2011 3:26 PM

You need to decide what the duty cycle is, how much power you'll need and the cost to operate over time. (Propane has less energy per volume, may be cheaper to operate)

The installation costs won't be much different. Do the math.

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Borrego Springs
Posts: 2636
Good Answers: 62
#6

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/02/2011 10:11 PM

You may be having the wrong conversation - 75' is not a well.

1,500 feet is a well. 5,000 is a well.

75 feet a homeowner sinks in the backyard with a do-it-yourself kit.

__________________
"If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!"
Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
Good Answers: 1
#7

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/02/2011 10:26 PM

If it is available the best alternative from an initial cost and ongoing expense would be natural gas just like many home, hospital and industrial emergency generator sets use. Propane and natural gas both are cleaner and there is less chance of contamination. If you have a natural gas system you never have to worry about running out of fuel and the changeover can be set up very easy to start automatically.

Rich Hurd

Dreams are window into the future

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 930
Good Answers: 31
#8

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/02/2011 10:43 PM

If you do not keep the diesel fuel fresh then you may not have a backup system at time of need. In this situation and depending on the history of outages I would go with the propane just for simplicity. If there is a big demand for back up a second propane tank would ease your fears. I have used propane both in vehicles, homes and businesses with no negative issues for many years. You have my two cents worth..

__________________
The fine line between cuddling and holding one down to prevent escape must be learned
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ground Zero of the Pompous and self important....Washington DC
Posts: 416
Good Answers: 8
#16
In reply to #8

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 9:08 AM

Diesel fuel doesn't need to be kept "Fresh" like gasoline. 20 or 30 year old (and even far older) diesel fuel will work perfectly well as long as its not contaminated.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the pool because it is too hot.
Posts: 3054
Good Answers: 141
#26
In reply to #16

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/04/2011 12:22 AM

Consider that diesel provides a nice home for algae and these clog up the fuel filters.

I have experienced this many times on ships that had no regular use.

__________________
Plenty of room here
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#27
In reply to #26

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/04/2011 1:06 AM

A centrifuge (many $) can get rid of that. Also Biobor®, a boron-based algicide (not so many $).

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: In the pool because it is too hot.
Posts: 3054
Good Answers: 141
#28
In reply to #27

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/04/2011 2:46 AM

Thanks for the hints. D.

__________________
Plenty of room here
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#9

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/02/2011 10:56 PM

If natural gas is available, it could power both the heater and the emergency genset.

If propane is going to be on hand anyway for the heater, using it also for the genset will avoid the complexity and cost of dual fuel systems.

You might find some sample costs by Googling "propane generators" or similar terms.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Texas
Posts: 116
Good Answers: 3
#13
In reply to #9

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 1:03 AM

If propane is going to be on hand anyway for the heater, using it also for the genset will avoid the complexity and cost of dual fuel systems.

Why not just run the propane exhaust from the genset through a heat exchanger to heat the pump house and let a given volume of fuel serve both purposes?

__________________
Just because it has a patent doesn't mean it is the best solution. Just because it has no patent doesn't mean it won't work. A patent is only a license to litigate.
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#14
In reply to #13

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 1:46 AM

Excellent strategy if the genset were running continuously, but this sounds like an occasional backup only.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South Texas
Posts: 116
Good Answers: 3
#18
In reply to #14

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 10:27 AM

but this sounds like an occasional backup only.

Wonder what would happen if they should discover that the use of the "backup" reduced overall operating cost?

__________________
Just because it has a patent doesn't mean it is the best solution. Just because it has no patent doesn't mean it won't work. A patent is only a license to litigate.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#20
In reply to #18

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 10:45 AM

Never happen so no problem

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ronan, Montana
Posts: 174
Good Answers: 10
#10

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/02/2011 11:11 PM

Sometimes in making calculations assessing BTU's per gallon of different fuel will help somewhat although in the end different fuels don't necessarily give the same efficiency.

Propane (LPG) 84,300 btu per gallon

#2 diesel 129,500 btu per gallon

LGN 75,000 btu per gallon

CNG 900 btu per cu/ft

Other considerations are that diesel can contaminate your well although it is very unlikely with today's dual walled tanks and the quality of the engine fuel lines, filters etc. Diesel also has a storage life and again there are ways to extend it but it costs more money.

Propane won't contaminate the well and stores forever but to get the same run time you would need a larger storage tank (might not be any more expensive than a dual walled diesel tank) and maybe a larger sized engine to get the same horsepower output.

I probably wouldn't consider the natural gas because (1) it wouldn't be reliable in a disaster situation from a local distribution line and (2) storing LNG is exttremely expensive because of the high pressure tanks needed.

__________________
"don't be so open minded that your brain falls out" unknown
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 80
Good Answers: 6
#11

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/02/2011 11:25 PM

Hello.We also have a small town/community well system.In a recent meeting with the DEP,they encouraged home owners to move away from fuel oil heating systems to natural gas or propane.They are concerned with leaking fuel oil into our groundwater.In our area the backup generators are self contained outside,not in the well house. Cost is around $4,000.They use about 60 cu. ft./hr LP or 120 cu. ft/hr NG.Hope this helps.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 44.56024"N 15.307971E
Posts: 8277
Good Answers: 270
#12

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 12:02 AM

Do you need for the generator to start automatically, or will it be started manually?Do you want a water cooled, or air cooled generator? Is noise a factor when generator is running?Do you have a qualified diesel mechanic on payroll to perform routine maintenance or will you have maintenance done under a service contract?

How often do you anticipate needing the backup?

If it has to run continuously for long periods, the diesel is more reliable, but more expensive.Most cities and municipalities used diesel for backup of pumping stations, if that is any comfort.

A containment wall around the engine will provide a sense of security if anything on the engine leaks, or if leaks occur during servicing.

Is natural gas available in your area? If so, have you considered a fuel cell instead? Very quiet,super efficient.Very little maintenance required.No petroleum leaks to worry about.

More info would be helpful, such as pump hp, service factor of pump, starting amps of pump motor, heating requirements during winter for heat tracing of piping, etc.

__________________
"A man never stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child." "Never argue with a stupid person.They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience" "To create an apple pie from scratch, first you must create a universe"
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#15

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 2:52 AM

If natural gas is available in the area I expect they would not be using propane for heating.

If the propane tank can be buried it is the safest location.

Every time I study up on this I get conflicting opinions on the life of diesel - how long can it really sit before becoming a problem?

Register to Reply
2
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Red Hook, New York (Mid-Hudson River Valley)
Posts: 4362
Good Answers: 179
#17

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 9:42 AM

Over the years I've designed numerous emergency standby generator sets for water systems, pump stations and booster stations, to name a few (water systems, wastewater systems, municipal & government buildings/facilities, and airport facilities). Propane, NG and diesel fuels, and even gasoline, have been used in these gensets. Each fuel type has it's pros and it's cons and must be evaluated, with the following factors (but not limited to):

1. Cost comparisons.

2. Ease of maintenance/serviceability.

3. Availability of each fuel.

4. Fuel contamination.

5. Spill/leakage probability & associated dangers. This also includes effects on the environment and water source (in this case the aquifer).

The town's design engineer should be providing a feasibility study as part of his/her contract to ascertain the most acceptable fuel type. It is important that all types of fuel be presented, with alternatives presented also to the most. Don't forget that the State of Vermont (DEP or is it DOH?) gets to review and comment on the Engineering Report prior to issuance of a permit to proceed with construction.

From an engineering standpoint, I much prefer to use Natural Gas as a fuel source IF it is available, and next followed by Diesel fuel with frequent replenishment.

A few more thoughts: The problem with Propane is the highly fluctuating cost range. Also, in the past there have been shortages and problems with availability. Additionally, if there is a problem with the genset engine due to fouling you must find a qualified propane engine mechanic to work on it. Usually this is the company that installed the unit, and it can get very expensive. Make sure you have a long term service contract in-place as part of the Bid Package to assure that prices gouging doesn't happen.

Natural Gas is extremely reliable, but the maintenance headaches are nearly identical to that of using Propane fuels. Also, NG prices are regulated by the Feds and the state.

Diesel can get stale over a 6 month period. However, most municipalities have a DPW that employ mechanics to work on their highway equipment which usually have diesel engines, so it is fairly easy to fix an genset diesel engine that has gone out of warranty or has an expired service contract. Most likely Joe Blow down at the corner garage cane fix the darn thing!

As with any genset, it should Autostart once a week to charge the batteries and to self-diagnose/trouble shoot. If you're heating the well house to prevent freezing of the piping, then the issue of stale diesel fuel will be a non-issue as you're going to have to replenish the holding tank periodically. Leakage from a diesel tank shouldn't be an issue due to the manufacturer's double wall tanks. If there is further concern about an leakage, or spills during genset maintenance, then go ahead and provide a concrete containment wall of sufficient height and perimeter to hold any fuel spill. Also, make sure it is lined with an acceptable material to prevent transmittance of the fuel though the porous concrete!

Good luck with that well house!

__________________
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"; hendiatris attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar, 47 B.C.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 44.56024"N 15.307971E
Posts: 8277
Good Answers: 270
#19

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 10:28 AM

Have the engineer do a study of total operating cost for 5yr/10 year period.There are significant federal and state incentives for fuel cell installation, and credits for KW's generated by fuel cells.

I think he will be surprised at the total cost of ownership of the fuel cell systems.

If he wants to charge extra for this study, do it yourself with Google.There are many manf. of fuel cells that will provide the information freely.

Then you can present the facts to backup your alternatives.

Hydrogen is cheaper than propane in many areas, and fuel cells are also available that use methanol reformers to make their own hydrogen.This is a very compact way to store the reserve energy.

The fuel cells require very low maintenance, and are very quite, so zoning issues are not likely.

__________________
"A man never stands so tall as when he stoops to help a child." "Never argue with a stupid person.They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience" "To create an apple pie from scratch, first you must create a universe"
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#21

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 10:48 AM

From Capt Moosie - Diesel can get stale over a 6 month period. However, most municipalities have a DPW that employ mechanics to work on their highway equipment which usually have diesel engines, so it is fairly easy to fix an genset diesel engine that has gone out of warranty or has an expired service contract. Most likely Joe Blow down at the corner garage cane fix the darn thing!

From Smoothy - Diesel fuel doesn't need to be kept "Fresh" like gasoline. 20 or 30 year old (and even far older) diesel fuel will work perfectly well as long as its not contaminated.

This is where the discussion normally ends up.

In the near future I need to buy a generator - diesel is preferable as it is cheaper here but I do not an alternate use for it.

Register to Reply
2
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ground Zero of the Pompous and self important....Washington DC
Posts: 416
Good Answers: 8
#22
In reply to #21

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 11:18 AM

My office has a Diesel backup Generator, it gets exercised once a month for 30 minutes. We have a 500 Gallon tank we keep full, or at least never below 75% full. We, top-off once a year, in effect with dilution we have a large percentage of old but clean fuel, and it never, causes problems, or any concern. Fires within 2 or 3 engine revolutions every time.

I've been maintaining Diesel UPS systems (275kilowatts to 2 megawatts) for the better part of 25 years. Both Rotary and static types. Not as my primary responsibility, but as a secondary one.

What some people might blame as being stale....is more than likely suffering from some form of contamination. (for which there are numerous additives that can be used to prevent this) It does undergo minor changes as it gets old, but it still works fine for many, many years and the average person would not know the difference, very much unlike stale gasoline that can cause numerous problems.

But as others have stated, current USA Federal regulations of above ground fuel storage tanks (like dual walled and a secondary containment dam) make spills less of an issue than they once were. And its far more difficult to bury a fuel tank these days. I don't deal with any underground tanks at all so don't know how hard.

I know people that recover old #2 heating oil from old fuel tanks from houses and businesses that changed from heating oil to something else sometimes decades ago....all they do is run it though filters and water seperators and use it without problem in off-road applications. Some of this fuel was verified to be 20 + years old.

They usually get it free when being paid to remove an old oil heating oil or fuel tank.

And it far reduces the amount of contaminated waste to deal with.

I agree with Capt Mossie on every other aspect he mentioned.

But this is the internet...and the guy in charge is ultimately responsible for his own choice (assuming its not a woman). There are plenty of good reasons most are diesel. But they aren't the only choice as has been mentioned by others. Cost of operation plays a hand, and that may be more important than the additional complexity and difficulty to service in units that see a lot of use.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#23
In reply to #22

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 11:22 AM

Thanks!

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Red Hook, New York (Mid-Hudson River Valley)
Posts: 4362
Good Answers: 179
#24

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 3:30 PM

HiTekRedNek has an great alternative in suggesting hydrogen fuel cells, particularly when Federal and State energy grants and credits are utilized + it's a very clean burning fuel type and economical as all heck once one gets by the Principal Costs and capitalization. The technology is now mature and has been proven over the years.

I forgot to mention this fuel source.....duhhhh is me! LOL

GA for his answer!

__________________
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"; hendiatris attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar, 47 B.C.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 706
Good Answers: 32
#25

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/03/2011 4:30 PM

Since you are in Vermont we're talking cold winters. You might want to heat trace the fuel supply line to the diesel if you go with diesel. If you lose heat in that pump room the diesel fuel might not flow too well to the diesel engine. Diesel and #2 are very close and many a home owner in New Jersey has regretted not tracing their fuel oil lines after a long cold snap when their tank is outside the house even in an enclosed shed next to the house.

The point made about the DEP is very true here in NJ also. A leaky tank has cost many a homeowner well over $20,000 and if it hits the water table even more.

__________________
Spinco
Register to Reply
2
Power-User

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ronan, Montana
Posts: 174
Good Answers: 10
#29

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/04/2011 3:10 AM

My curiosity got the best of me so I ran some figures on the cost per thousand btu's of our three main fuels in western Montana. (we don't have natural gas here on the Rez).

Gasoline 3.59 per gallon /115,000 btu per gallon = .031 per M btu's

Diesel 4.19 per gallon /129,500 btu per gallon = .032 per M btu's

Propane 2.10 per gallon /84,500 btu per gallon = .025 per M btu's

so... .025(propane)/.032(diesel) = .78 which means propane is 22% cheaper than diesel. That translates to dollars in the pocket today, but today only. Who knows what tomorrow will be.

Diesel is good but it has some problems (like if it's green, it's got algae in it and it could cause pollution if it leaks. Natural gas would be ideal except what are you going to do when the supply line is cut from a flood or something else? LNG would be great except for the cost of the tanks. Propane is cheaper, it won't pollute, it won't go bad from long term storage, so...if you're a bean counter and a gloom and doom enviromentalist, there's only one choice. At least, in this part of the world.

__________________
"don't be so open minded that your brain falls out" unknown
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Borrego Springs
Posts: 2636
Good Answers: 62
#30
In reply to #29

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/04/2011 11:13 PM

Really good summary!

Propane down in New Mexico (delivered) fluctuates wildly in price between summer and winter purchases. I can get $2.50 if I buy in bulk - even for delivery in January, where a January purchase will cost me over $5.00.

__________________
"If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!"
Register to Reply
Guru
Fans of Old Computers - ZX-81 - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: 18N 65W o
Posts: 1003
Good Answers: 28
#31

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/08/2011 10:14 PM

Used to live on LI also. PR is much nicer. I would go for propane. Far easier to start in the winter. We used propane to power the tower sites just for this reason. As others have pointed out you aren't providing enough info. What is your power failure history?

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
Good Answers: 2
#33
In reply to #31

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/09/2011 8:12 AM

Onlly a few hours per year in power failures, but a large company has taken over our little municipal and I don't know about their rate. I suspect it will be low, but we'll be part of a larger network and who knows when they will get to us.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#32

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/09/2011 4:22 AM

The capital plus operating costs together are what count. Here a propane fuel generator costs excessively in comparison to a diesel or gasoline fuel unit.

Gasoline is about 10% more costly per liter than diesel - so my only real choice is diesel.

Register to Reply
Associate

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 28
Good Answers: 2
#34
In reply to #32

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/09/2011 8:18 AM

Our town has a propane dealer who will sell us propane for $2/gallon. They have service people as well. The generator will be outside and I wonder what the starting problems in winter will be. It is possible to have temps as low as -25F. If diesel is cheaper on the capital end, why are diesel engines so much more than gas when you buy a car?

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#36
In reply to #34

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/09/2011 11:04 AM

Different engine when you start talking about common rail diesel - more expensive.

Here prices are in the range of

95 ocatane - 8,61$ US per gallon

euro diesel - 7,74$ US per gallon

LPG - 5,06$ US per gallon

Register to Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Borrego Springs
Posts: 2636
Good Answers: 62
#37
In reply to #36

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/09/2011 12:41 PM

Russ,

I have heard this before and it confuses me - common rail diesel more expensive

At the risk of thread-jacking

We went to common rail gasoline to avoid the high production cost of direct injection while still getting the control and avoiding the expense of carbs.

Common rail diesel with low pressure injectors, low pressure pumps, should to my mind be cheaper than the tradition head injection; so I clearly do not understand.

Short enough to 'splain it here or shall I kick off a new thread?

__________________
"If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!"
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Red Hook, New York (Mid-Hudson River Valley)
Posts: 4362
Good Answers: 179
#38
In reply to #36

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/09/2011 12:52 PM

Russ, are those Turkish fuel prices?

Prices in the USA for each fuel are considerably much lesser...

__________________
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"; hendiatris attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar, 47 B.C.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 2142
Good Answers: 31
#39
In reply to #38

Re: Diesel Versus Propane for Emergency Power Generation for Water Supply

10/09/2011 1:35 PM

Turkish prices - can't really import fuel

Turkey followed the Euro model as regards fuel as a great tax source.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 39 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

CaptMoosie (3); dvmdsc (2); edignan (3); Ethanolics Unanimous (2); grandpaw (1); HiTekRedNek (2); hurdent (1); JWthetech (1); lyn (1); Randyl (2); redfred (3); roy hammy (1); russ123 (7); sloopster3 (4); Smoothy (2); Spinco (1); Tornado (3)

Previous in Forum: Fairbanks   Next in Forum: Chinese Railway Signalling Continues to Worry

Advertisement