Previous in Forum: Cables Armed & Shield   Next in Forum: 3 Phase Motor Redesign Winding
Close
Close
Close
31 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Good Answers: 1

NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/01/2012 6:16 PM

So we got these VFD panels for the Iso phase duct cooler motors and they are installed about 5 ft away from the hydrogen dryer discharge (for the hydrogen to cool the generator)

The client was responsible for writing the spec and apparently, they messed up.

So the enclosures are NEMA 4X, is there any way to cover them with something to make it equal to NEMA type 7?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 6:30 PM

Sure, put the 4X enclosure inside a type 7 enclosure.

Sounds like a "change of scope".

This should have been caught at a preliminary review.

Make it safe!

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Good Answers: 1
#2

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 6:40 PM

That's a good idea, but wouldn't it void the NEMA rating since we will be tempering with the boxes. They are installed on a wall.

Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3
In reply to #2

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 6:48 PM

Remove the non-compliant enclosure and replace it with the correct item.

The liability implications should be obvious to you and your customer. They will be to your customer's insurance company.

It the facility explodes and kills someone...........................................$$$$$$$$$$$$

Has the customer accepted the installation? Has it been commissioned?

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Good Answers: 1
#4
In reply to #3

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 7:05 PM

Installation has been accepted, but it hasn't been commissioned yet.

Can't do what you said, NRC is watching us.

Register to Reply
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#6
In reply to #4

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 7:47 PM

Can't do what you said, NRC is watching us.

What's NRC stand for?

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#8
In reply to #6

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 7:52 PM
Register to Reply
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#9
In reply to #8

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 8:12 PM

Oh, I really hoped it wasn't that NRC.

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#7
In reply to #4

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 7:50 PM

Good luck.

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#12
In reply to #4

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/02/2012 3:08 AM

Please confirm the installation is no closer than 1500 miles from Dodman's Lane Level Crossing....

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 1983
Good Answers: 25
#23
In reply to #12

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/03/2012 6:35 AM

They are your next door neighbors, better pack up.

__________________
"Engineers should not look for jobs but should create jobs for others" by Dr.Radhakrishnan Ex President of India during my college graduation day
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: India
Posts: 1246
Good Answers: 34
#14
In reply to #4

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/02/2012 3:59 AM

Then don't ever do it. Do exactly what is required by code. Do not short circuit the code.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 196
Good Answers: 6
#24
In reply to #4

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/03/2012 8:10 PM

If you fear the NRC now wait until one of their inspectors spot the non-compliant installation. BOHICA MAXIMUS

Seriously, if you do not correct the installation; you and everyone associated with it will be in extreme danger as well as serious personal jeopardy of heavy fines and/or incarceration if anything should ever happen now or at any time in the future. (No expiration date or time limit for negligence.)

There is also severe personal risk of litigation and monetary loss associated with this error in judgement that also has no time limit.

Shut it down and replace it.

Register to Reply
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#5

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 7:45 PM

A US installation, NEC500 Class I Division I? Not what I am certified for but I will take a crack at it.

What is the existing VFD panel certified to, because if it is NOT certified and only has a NEMA (weather) rating then it is not suitable for installation in a Division 1 application as you mention above and must be mounted in the safe area outside the zone.

Putting an industrial (non-Ex certified) piece of equipment in to a box with a higher NEMA rating won't work (although it may if you stick it into a flameproof box and get the whole thing certified, just don't expect to be able to buy a box and do it yourself as the certification does not allow this).

What does your inspector say?

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California, USA, where the Godless live next door to God.
Posts: 4665
Good Answers: 804
#10

Re: NEMA 4X box upgrade to meet Hazardous area qualification

10/01/2012 8:48 PM

There is nothing you can "cover" a NEMA 4 enclosure with to make it NEMA 7, it's like asking if there is some special paint I can put on my Chevy to make it a Cadilac.

The only possible way to ressurect the enclosed system as it is now might be to use a "purged air" system, but it requires that you have instrument grade clean compressed air at the box location. Here's an example:

http://www.isa.org/InTechTemplate.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=83590

__________________
** All I every really wanted to be, was... A LUMBERJACK!.**
Register to Reply
2
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Good Answers: 1
#11

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/02/2012 12:22 AM

I am in Florida.

Yep, I kinda knew that NEMA 4X to NEMA 7 upgrade won't work, but it was worth a try. I think the VFD panels are NEMA 3R (even worse).

Too bad, they should have been more careful when writing the spec. I suggest to relocate the H2 Gas dryer discharge away from the equipments.

Thanks guys.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#13

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/02/2012 3:09 AM

What's wrong with re-routing the hydrogen dryer discharge somewhere else? After all, it would be easier.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
New Zealand - Member - Kiwi Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Power Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Electrical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8777
Good Answers: 376
#18
In reply to #13

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/02/2012 2:39 PM

I thought about this too but came to the conclusion that it would likely only drop the zone classification down to Class I division 2 (gas not likely to occur and for short periods only) rather than down to a safe area, which still wouldn't fix the problem given the industrial (uncertified) nature of the equipment.

__________________
jack of all trades
Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#15

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/02/2012 4:20 AM

In principle, how would one attend to the settings on the front panel of a VFD mounted inside inside a flameproof/NEMA7 enclosure without obtaining a Hot Work Permit and opening the enclosure <rhetorical question - NNTR>?

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1
#19
In reply to #15

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/02/2012 10:43 PM

Coordinate w/VFD manufacturer for the max safe distance of drives from motors. Locate drives outside hazardous classified location. Provide filters on the load side of drives to dV/dt effect for increased distance of drives outside hazardous location. C oordinate w/manufacturer on details.

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 6)
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Good Answers: 1
#16

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/02/2012 4:31 AM

The mechanical guys will have a cow to move the H2 Dryer.

Oh well, too bad. Electrical wins this time.

Register to Reply
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Indeterminate Engineering Fields - Control Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: In the bothy, 7 chains down the line from Dodman's Lane level crossing, in the nation formerly known as Great Britain. Kettle's on.
Posts: 32175
Good Answers: 839
#17
In reply to #16

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/02/2012 4:36 AM

Win/lose? How abstruse.

__________________
"Did you get my e-mail?" - "The biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place" - George Bernard Shaw, 1856
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Coxsackie, NY
Posts: 533
Good Answers: 10
#20

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/02/2012 11:26 PM

Ya sure can. Use a Bebco Class 1 Div 2 purge system. Sold many of these over the years and no one ever had any issues with them.

__________________
"Real Bass Players" do not use picks
Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1503
Good Answers: 128
#21

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/03/2012 1:32 AM

Bestofalis,

Both JRaef and Jimh77 have mentioned a purging system. That is recognized in the NEC for a class-1 div-1 or -2 environment, with some restrictions. Your post does not indicate if this is a div-1 or div-2 location, but I suspect more likely div-2. However, with Hydrogen you are group-B and inspectors, etc. get very nervous.

You have a few options, but none of them is cheap and easy:

  • Turn the entire problem over to a qualified independent engineer, and let that person determine what needs to be done and who should pay for it. This is probably the best thing you can do.
  • If the drives are indeed in a NEMA-4X or NEMA-12 enclosure (not NEMA-3R), then you may be allowed to use a pressurized purging system. They aren't cheap, but aren't real expensive either. Hoffman is one of a number of companies in this market niche. In addition to the purging, if the area is div-1 you may also need to include a gas monitor or means to ensure that the enclosure has been purged by 10 or more fills of purging gas after the door was closed before energizing the equipment inside.
  • For access to the keypad/display, you could wire it through an intrinsically safe barrier.
  • If you use any closed and sealed enclosure, you have to deal with the waste heat output by the VFD. The amount is readily obtained from drive manufacturers. As an example, recently I had to figure this for a 125Hp drive, and was told 1400 W or 8,000 BtuH.
  • If the VFD is not in a NEMA-4X or NEMA-12 enclosure, you might be able to move it into one, but beware of the cooling, etc. problems mentioned above. Others have worried about this, but if the VFD manufacturer approves such an enclosed mounting, then you are good.
  • Better may be to relocate the VFD to a location sufficiently distant that it is in a non-classified location.
  • Be prepared to protest the installation and refuse to connect to it (packing up tools and voiding your contract or quitting your employment may be necessary). A few decades ago, a structural contractor did so when some skywalks were being installed in a midwestern hotel lobby--when they collapsed and killed quite a number of people, that contractor was found not-liable for the harm done.

You mention the NRC, so this implies that you are dealing with a nuclear power plant. All your problems are magnified, because of the need for redundancy in critical systems with significant physical separation of the redundant systems. This makes me think that you will have to go to an outside engineering firm to get the problem solved, and that the time frame before all the approvals are in place and the work done could be as much as 12-months.

--JMM

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru

Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Coxsackie, NY
Posts: 533
Good Answers: 10
#28
In reply to #21

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/04/2012 12:49 AM

Great stuff you have brought to this table. Way past my thougts. But then, when I was selling the Bebco systems I was a sales guy. Now back to engineering Marine Propulsion Systems, electric Systems. Nothing hazardous. Unless you consider bilge water Toxic.

You nailed this one to the wall though! I gave the point. I thought you made the case and brought the monkey home!

__________________
"Real Bass Players" do not use picks
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Active Contributor

Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 10
Good Answers: 1
#22

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/03/2012 5:11 AM

Yep, we are actually the contractor for utility company, and it is at a nuclear plant.

Purging system sounds like an idea.

Thanks for all your detailed responses and suggestion. I am going to present these ideas to the client and see which one is more feasible for them. Money is no issue in nuclear plants, although schedule is. So, they got their options, it will be the matter of what idea they like the most and go forward with.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1503
Good Answers: 128
#27
In reply to #22

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/03/2012 11:49 PM

Bestofalis,

Are you familiar with vortex cooling systems. They use plant air through a cleverly-designed device that splits the air into two streams as it is released through a nozzle. One is hot (exhausted) and the other cold (into the enclosure). You must have a suitably clean air supply at an SCFM capacity to run the cooler. They can be thermostatically controlled, however. I don't know how they would work in an enclosure that must be otherwise sealed and pressurized (to about 0.8 inches of water). The original patent holder was Vortec (if I recall correctly), but I recently saw them (probably by license) in a Hoffman catalog.

--JMM

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Good Answers: 1
#25

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/03/2012 9:54 PM

Being long enough in oil & gas and technical HSE & risk, please do not mess with anything that may lead to dire consequences...

If the client messed up, inform him objectively that it is "not good / safe enough" and he needs to change. Note that the design ownership is on you. They would have set aside a budget for variation orders before the project started and changing the panel will not kill their careers or company.

If the client refused, issue a technical query with all the technical facts and implications, get his answer in black and white, to cover yourself (just in case)....

Question - using hydrogen to cool a generator? This is new to me...the hindenburg disaster would have put a restain to this design...

And if hydrogen is involved, please also get a panel that is suitable for use in the hydrogen environment...i.e. Gas Group B panels...

Good luck...

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1503
Good Answers: 128
#26
In reply to #25

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/03/2012 11:42 PM

Thong,

Actually, Hydrogen is very commonly the cooling gas of choice for the generators and the power bus duct from them to the switchyard. Hydrogen molecules are the fastest and have the smallest size so they can penetrate into the windings better than anything else. A lot of care is taken to ensure that the gas remains pure, but there have been a couple times when sufficient contaminating air entered that there was an explosion. In big power plants, the problems to be overcome because of the use of hydrogen are fairly small compared with the overall complexity of the entire plant.

--JMM

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 15
Good Answers: 1
#29
In reply to #26

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/04/2012 12:53 AM

Hello JMM, thanks for the education. I did not know about this. However, in offshore oil and gas facilities, (at least during my years) I have never come across this method for cooling the generators. I guess this would apply to only onshore power plants then?...

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern Kansas USA
Posts: 1503
Good Answers: 128
#30
In reply to #29

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/04/2012 7:48 AM

Sir: Yes, and very large ones typical of the central utility generating plants. When I worked shutdowns at the Arkansas Nuclear One, they were there (two 1500mW generators, if I recall correctly). --JMM

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Burlington, MA
Posts: 10
#31

Re: NEMA 4X Box Upgrade to Meet Hazardous Area Qualification

10/05/2012 10:33 AM

You can purge the enclosure. You can buy either an X-purge for Division 1 spaces, or Z-purge for Division 2 spaces. Although 5ft from a hydrogen source is most likely Division 1, so you're looking at an X-purge.
These are air purge kits that attach to the outside of the enclosure. You supply them with compressed air (hopefully available) and they purge the inside of the enclosure so that a NEMA 4X enclosure can be installed inside an electrically rated area. The incoming power to the enclosure gets routed through this purge system such that loss of purge pressure will automatically disconnect power to the enclosure. Bebco makes them as well as Pepperl+Fuchs. Or, you have to buy another enclosure, properly rated NEMA 7 as you said.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 31 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

bestofalis (5); bssalva (1); jack of all trades (4); Jimh77 (2); jmueller (4); Joshi (1); JRaef (1); jsavage (1); lyn (4); PWSlack (4); SHOCKISCAN (1); suresh sharma (1); thong (2)

Previous in Forum: Cables Armed & Shield   Next in Forum: 3 Phase Motor Redesign Winding

Advertisement