Previous in Forum: How Frictional Force Effects a Bullet While Spinning And Non-Spinning   Next in Forum: Variable Automatic Transmission
Close
Close
Close
Page 1 of 2: « First 1 2 Next > Last »
Rating: Comments: Nested
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219

Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/24/2012 4:50 PM

Ok here is the background basices of natural power that happens in nature we don't think of when happens.

1. Do you know why a breaseway Happens?, doors open at each end, a breeze inside and when going out side there is no wind?

2. Do you known why in a carport (Metal) when the sun hits the top, water drips from the bottom inside?

3. Why in a tall structure is there so much updraft wind in the elavater shaft?

4. Why does heat rise up on glass , & when driving in the summer you can see heat waves rissing from the earth?

5. Why does the wind blow faster over water?

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: renewable energy Naturals
This discussion was "closed" on 12/03/2012 10:23 AM. No new comments are allowed.
Message from admins:
The thread has devolved into posts that violate the User Policies, so it's being closed.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#1

Re: common natural power not reallized

11/24/2012 4:56 PM

I hope you have a prescription for whatever that is.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#2
In reply to #1

Re: common natural power not reallized

11/24/2012 5:25 PM

Don't be so hard on the guy. Where would we be without crazy ideas that would never work?

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#3
In reply to #2

Re: common natural power not reallized

11/24/2012 5:35 PM

No! No mercy. We all know, "why a 'breaseway' Happens".

This is gibberish.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#11
In reply to #1

Re: common natural power not reallized

11/25/2012 8:02 AM

Yes I do from nature HA>HA. The reality from the questions & some of the responce is by most part Smart???? ASS without thought.

The others shows that in most smart people understand high school science class, so with that said what happened when you were in school & in life if you have paid attation of why things happen?

Most people can't use the questions on simple things and get answers from knowledageable people that know.

The planets environment is in trobble and needs all of us to help!, Are you the type to say yes and do nothing or wait for some one to do something?

The energy site is up for Education of facts to the public awearness of emerging

techonologies that can change the approuch that has till now very costly and don't work when the wind don't blow or the sun isn't shinning.

I am really disapointed that this site let the remarks that you have on many things here be insulting to know from some one whom claims to be informed.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#12
In reply to #11

Re: common natural power not reallized

11/25/2012 8:06 AM

I refuse to verbally joust with an unarmed man.

<unsubscribe>

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1895
Good Answers: 44
#79
In reply to #12

Re: common natural power not reallized

11/30/2012 10:30 AM

Just think if you could convert CR4 comments to hot air...ahh, the possibilities.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1895
Good Answers: 44
#78
In reply to #11

Re: common natural power not reallized

11/30/2012 10:29 AM

I would love to see your patents for these alternative energy ideas. Where are they listed?

Here?

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#4

Re: Common Natural Power Not Reallized

11/24/2012 5:42 PM

It's all from a million invisible fairies waving a million invisible fans. Plus chaos theory.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - New Member

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC USA
Posts: 13529
Good Answers: 468
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Common Natural Power Not Reallized

11/24/2012 5:51 PM

It's the damned butterflies!

__________________
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Ben Franklin
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#5

Re: Common Natural Power Not Reallized

11/24/2012 5:50 PM

I was of the understanding that high school level physics pretty well explained those events and actions for most of us. If you missed it then Google can help you out now.

As far as realizations of such things go I have suspicions its proportionally related to ones working IQ. The higher functioning the IQ the more of life's details realized.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#13
In reply to #5

Re: Common Natural Power Not Reallized

11/25/2012 8:10 AM

Yes I agree! It's prety clear that some very low IQ's here! some have the book smarts but no clue how to use what they know, Common sense?

The questions ask is what makes up just some things used in the renewable energy systems from nature that happens around us each day 24/7 , It's the how to till now of what type structure membrain that can handle the tempture changes without bamage.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply
3
Anonymous Poster #1
#20
In reply to #13

Re: Common Natural Power Not Reallized

11/25/2012 11:23 PM

PLEASE use your spell checker before posting! It would raise your apparent IQ by several decades!

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Glen Mills, PA.
Posts: 2385
Good Answers: 114
#7

Re: Common Natural Power Not Reallized

11/24/2012 8:26 PM

Not that I want to mess with your mind, but taking your #3. If you put the building inside a bubble, you would still get the updraft while the bubble is on the earth, but if you took the bubble out above the surface and let it fall freely, the updraft would stop.

__________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1753
Good Answers: 59
#8

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/24/2012 10:44 PM

Yes, I know them all. But, revealing them requires huge yet unspecified payments. Please state, how high you are willing to go. Contact my agent at Lyndoor Agencies. Cash or precious metals only in the bid.

Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#17
In reply to #8

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/25/2012 7:03 PM

It seems that many of you make fun of a real problem like our world's environment & don't have a clue when som one has a real facts to help stop a real problem. Instead of fun making how about a real approuch to helping get people thinking instead of making fun of them whom want to help.

The questions are for thoese who never paid attation in school or life.

Now get ral and act with respect or your age whichever is the bigger.

This site is for disccions on all things to make better approuches to many things better understood.

The how to is known & it seems that you don't, Maybe if you do then you contact me from the energy site after you reread it for partingships.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1895
Good Answers: 44
#80
In reply to #17

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 10:40 AM

You are posting questions on an Engineering forum and expect the audience to be "thoese who never paid attation in school or life"?

Conference Room 4® (CR4) is a forum for engineers, scientists, technical researchers, technical buyers, students and folks who just like technology to discuss engineering news, seek technical help and get answers to burning questions. Maybe you need to re-read the rules of the forum...

Also, you posted in the Mechanical Engineering section.

Post in the appropriate section of the forum, i.e., New Technologies or Sustainable Engineering and you may get a more receptive crowd...but I doubt it.

What, praytell, are "partingships"?

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where the sun sets on OZ
Posts: 1381
Good Answers: 28
#9

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/24/2012 11:47 PM

Can you answer why some of these don't happen. If so then you will be well on the way to understanding why they do happen most of the time.

__________________
Where's the KaBoom? There should be a KaBoom!
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#14
In reply to #9

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/25/2012 8:20 AM

It's the only way to get people to open their minds to thought! For some have forgot that our world has for many years around the world have research of how to.

The facts are known and under construction as a proto type home system for urban development of 5 homes.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Atchison Village
Posts: 383
Good Answers: 39
#10

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/25/2012 1:31 AM

Maybe his brain is wired with Al conductors?

__________________
Align culture with nature...
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Fans of Old Computers - PDP 11 - New Member Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 2168
Good Answers: 71
#15

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/25/2012 9:40 AM

I will open my mind to well constructed sentences with correct spelling of words.

<unsubscribe>

__________________
Tom - "Hoping my ship will come in before the dock rots!"
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#18
In reply to #15

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/25/2012 7:08 PM

Even a child understands whats on the energy site ,even with miss spelled words of a handicap person. If you are so slow the stop sign hits you in the rear, are you going forward or backwards?

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 2 for Off Topic
2
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - Let's keep knowledge expanding Engineering Fields - Retired Engineers / Mentors - Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North America, Earth
Posts: 4528
Good Answers: 106
#16

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/25/2012 5:35 PM

#1: doesn't happen

#2: The water is condensation from the cool evening. It doesn't require sunshine to drip.

#3: Because hot air rises from its decreased density.

#4: I don't know the explanation of the heat waves from earth, but you can Google it.

#5: There are no obstacles to slow the wind down.

__________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” - Richard Feynman
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#19

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/25/2012 8:15 PM

By all means, feel free to tap any of these power sources. Rig up something, try it out, and report back how much energy you get per dollar expended. Good luck.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#21

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 3:54 AM

What is the question here? What do you want us to tell you?

You had five questions which are too simple...any child who has a grade five education can answer them. Are you looking for something different than the grade five science textbook?

1. I am going to skip that since I don't understand the question. Are you wondering why there is a breeze in a breezeway? How much wind is "no wind", there must be some to provide a breeze.

2. Do I know why in a metal carport, when the sun hits the top, water drips from the bottom inside? Answer...No it does not. The dew that forms overnight on the surface of the metal rains down all night, and actually stops when the sun comes out. Same thing happens inside a sea container. The sun begins to warm the metal, the droplets become a little larger as they warm up, and they drip faster, until of course, they simply evaporate. So your observation may be valid for just a tiny slice of time, if at all.

3. There is an updraft wind in an elevator shaft? Really? Why do you suppose it does not happen in the elevator shafts I work in? So, no, your observation is faulty.

4. Heat rises on glass...well, I suppose. If there is heat, on glass or anything else, it rises. So what? So does smoke. Usually.

5. The wind blows faster over water because there is less friction with the ground. No ground...less friction.

Here are a couple back at you....

1, There are three doors. Behind one of the doors is a beautiful woman. Behind the other two doors are ferocious tigers who will kill you if you open their door and let them out.

The evil zoo owner has asked you to pick a door but don't look in. You pick one totally at random. The zoo owner opens the little viewing window on one of the un-picked doors, and you see that there is a tiger behind that door. (fortunately, you are safe from THAT tiger!) So now the evil zoo keeper askes you if you want to stay with the door you picked, or would you like to switch.

He tells you that if you switch, you have a two thirds chance of surviving. If you do not switch, you have a one third chance of surviving. Is he lying to you?

Now here is the question....WHY are the odds not fifty fifty at this point...there are only two doors remaining, right?

Would you switch? Would it matter?

Here is another one.

2, You have an electrical circuit, with two light bulbs in parallel. The dimmer resistor is set to half the resistance of both the two bulbs. If one of the bulbs burns out, will the remaining bulb glow brighter or dimmer, or because they are connected in parallel, will the illumination stay the same in the remaining light bulb?

Here is another one.

3. If you have a hundred pounds of canaries sitting in cages in the cargo hold of an airplane. The plane hits turbulance, and the cages all spring open and the canaries all fly around. Will the plane be lighter, and bounce upwards with that hundred pounds of weight suddenly removed from its cargo hold?

Here is another one.

4. You are in a boat in a swimming pool. It has a lot of heavy iron objects in the boat. You decide to throw the heavy iron objects out of the boat, and they sink to the bottom of the swimming pool. Will the level of water in the swimming pool rise or fall?

And five for five...

5. You are in a boat tied up to the dock, and the rope ladder is over the side, just touching the water. The rungs of the ladder are 8 inches apart. There are twelve inches to a foot. The tide is coming in at the rate of 2 feet per hour. How many rungs are covered in the six hours the tide takes to come in all the way?

6. A man who is deaf and dumb goes into a store, and wants to purchase a pair of sunglasses. He indicates the sun glasses, and mimes putting them on, and makes a motion like a pencil to question the price. You, the clerk, see what he is doing and write the answer down on a piece of paper. A blind gentleman comes in and wants to get a hearing aid. How does he indicate to the clerk that he needs to price out a hearing aid?

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Stoke-on-Trent, UK
Posts: 4496
Good Answers: 137
#22
In reply to #21

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 6:36 AM

Problem no.6 - he asks for it. 1 - 5, can't be bothered. No.1 was discussed at length on this forum a while back. It's named after a presenter on a US TV show, but I don't remember his name.

__________________
Give masochists a fair crack of the whip
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#29
In reply to #21

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 11:57 AM

Sorry! I thought through other post I did answer your questions, as when I post It is for all to read so as to understand what is ask from each post replys.

I do hope this answers your post if not check out the energy site for more information that isn't released to the public proto type still under research & construction phase.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#30
In reply to #29

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 12:42 PM

You've not ever produced even the smallest amount of verifiable information on your "site".

It is my opinion that you, and it, are a scam!

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#36
In reply to #30

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 7:37 PM

It's is clear that you haven't read the information from the energy site item 3. last 8 pages are from major Univ. statements and proof from them , Not from me.

Come on Lyn, this proves lack of ability to read and understand facts misspelled or not.

A scam mostly ref. to some money took. This systems is not for sale , so how is it a scam when no funds are used.

Released information to the public on a less costly approuch to the cost of wind & solar systems for a community size group to own their own power resource, How is that a scam?

The fund rasing doc. is for travel to that community to give more information speaking cost. Not free to travel cost something to get there & meeting halls and meails.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#42
In reply to #36

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:50 PM

Kenny,

Once again, I visited your website. Nothing has changed.

It is still filled with gibberish and absolutely NO SUBSTANCE whatsoever!! Not even one reference to any legitimate information.

In fact, it is pitiful.

I still think that you, and it, are a scam!!!!

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#50
In reply to #30

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 9:26 AM

Lyn It is clear that you want to read the how to section wihtout thought you still would not understand even with blue prints.

The energy site dose not have the how to spelled out for you. It simply states whats involved in its makeup. Not where or how?

After protype is finnished & pat is in hands then will full disclosser will be given, This is to keep big companies & forgein country's from keeping it for them self's instead the common public.

I am sorry that you can't see past the anger of lack of common sence to use what is covered in pappers from other researchers from around the world last 8 pages of item 3. complete explainition fact sheets.

I hope you can slow down and read a little more than a couple first page.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
3
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#51
In reply to #50

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 9:47 AM

Kenny,

Once again, there is no verifiable scientific evidence that this is anything but a fraud, just like you.

Your claims are preposterous and not based on any facts. The last 8 pages of #3 reveal a complete lack of professionalism and no evidence of any positive outcome.

Your references to God make this even more of a sham and a fraud, since you would have us believe that God spoke to you.

There are no references to any universities and no references to any factual information, at all.

You are a fraud.

Seek professional help, you need it.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#32
In reply to #21

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 1:00 PM

I would at least sniff at the door selected before changing my mind on question #1. If you can't tell the difference between the way a tiger and a woman smells, well then....sorry.

#2 brighter on the remaining functioning light bulb.

#3 the plane is suddenly imbalanced in lift and weight, and rises until compensated.

#4 the level in the pool drops since, less water is being displaced.

#5 zero rungs, as the boat rises with the tide. The ladder still just touches the water.

#6 the blind man is not dumb, he simply asks.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#41
In reply to #32

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:45 PM

At least you tried!

The lady and the tiger story is a very old one. I want to update it to a minefield scenario. With a hundred spots which "might" have a mine on it. You select a spot, say, number 24. Then I methodically remove the earth from 98 other spots, leaving only one, plus the one you selected. The number doesn't matter, but lets say, number 55 is still covered and may still have a mine in it. Or it may not.

The question is...what are the chances (the "odds")that the mine is under spot 55? Under spot 24? If you had to disturb one spot or the other, which one is safer to mess with?

(and now try it with a train going down a track...rolling towards a switch which will send it down tunnel number one, tunnel number two, or tunnel number three. You go left, and head for tunnel number one. The radio crackles and you hear that two tunnels have been blocked, but the guy on the radio doesn't know which two. He KNOWS that tunnel number three is most definitely blocked. Should you stay on track one, or should you take a chance on track two? The deciding points (switches) are coming up fast! This is life or death, and you can't stop in time. Which gives you the best chance...staying or switching? )

Can you explain WHY the remaining light bulb, which was connected in parallel with the one that burned out, now suddenly glows brighter just because its mate burned out? Not saying it does, mind you, just wondering if there was a good reason for it. This was the one that my electrical engineering students got wrong the most.

I get that the birds are affecting the balance, but by taking flight, did they change the weight of the aircraft?

Number four is again, tricky. You are right of course, and neatly explained why. Thanks for playing.

Number five was just mean of me, I know. But again, you figured out that all that talk about inches and feet was just a smokescreen.

And of course, the blind man just asks.

I was curious if our OP was clever enough to figure them out. If he was, then I would take him MUCH more seriously. As it is, he seems to have a hold of an idea and won't let it go. And he is ignoring our statements and complaining when we contradict his.

Here is one for you...just because you played the game.

You are driving a bus down the road and pick up fourteen customers at the first stop. Drive on a little longer and at the next stop you pick up four passengers and drop of eight. Third stop you drop of three, pick up seven, and one flags you down, and you let her on. Forth stop you drop off a lovely young couple and pick up a group of a dozen surly teenagers who hassle you about paying. So you kick off half of them. Fifth stop, you pick up a full score and drop off two couples.

Following me so far?

I will mark this one as off topic before the world does!!! But this is FUN!

Now, how old is the bus driver?

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: No. VA, USA (No, it does NOTu mean "won't go"!)
Posts: 1796
Good Answers: 75
#44
In reply to #41

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:56 PM

I don't know about any OTHER bus drivers, but I'm 58.

__________________
Been away a while. Miss all my old friends. Some of you I KNOW are still around. Where are the rest?
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#64
In reply to #32

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 3:17 PM

That is the best post I have seen! you must also be a poiet or at least have common sence. Thats not a insult by no means, Just strange use of words.

I I still don't understand why in your post you keep saying there is no substance in the energy site. well maybe you look for my next post in a new thread may help.

Sorry your having such hard time its' only the whats in it that counts right? Sooo far worng! How about our world at stake and all you want to is WHAT???

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#53
In reply to #21

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 9:49 AM

second try - I could not reply to your reply yusef1.

Do not switch, there is now an equal chance.

Light bulb remaining is brighter due to higher voltage now applied to this leg of the voltage divider.

The birds still exert their lift somewhere, and apparently this on the floor of the plane which is a system within itself, no change in the plane's lift, so I had to correct my first answer.

The bus driver (me) declines to reveal his age other than to say I am older than most.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
4
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: No. VA, USA (No, it does NOTu mean "won't go"!)
Posts: 1796
Good Answers: 75
#23

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 7:02 AM

Kennynabb6:

Let me weigh in on what seems to be bothering US, but a matter of which you seem oblivious.

Your questions, posed as they are, don't make any sense. Perhaps it is because of your use of punctuation (inconsistent, incorrect), your spelling (incorrect in many cases, nonsensical in others), or the fact that while you end your statements in interrogatives (the question mark) it is unclear whether you are

a) Trying to tell us something we already know

b) Asking why something happens (In which case, a school science class would have answered the questions, as would a Google search)

c) Attempting to communicate something WE haven't even covered in our answers.

And here is the problem. We can't tell WHAT you are trying to do. But with a sig that indicates you believe yourself a researcher/inventor, we are left to wonder how someone who seems to lack even a rudimentary education can be either. I know that seems harsh, but if you are unable to express yourself in even a rude fashion, but with clarity, how do you get any understanding of anything you research, and how are we to believe you have the knowledge to invent anything?

If you have a handicap which keeps you from expressing yourself in a more conventional manner, and there have been successful OPs here who do so, you cannot afford a "thin skin", nor to refuse to make us aware of the difficulty. We can only see what you show us. But we DO take into account issues with inability to express oneself, asking more careful questions to elicit the needed info.

We don't assume that is what is required.

And we don't take well to being castigated, or called rude names, because we don't take seeming nonsense seriously. You may be under the impression we read and post here because we have nothing better to do. On the contrary, we READ here to learn something related to an issue on which we are engaged, or just for the sake of learning something we don't know. We POST here to help out others who are here to learn, or for the sake of discussion.

And we post what you have called "smart ass" comments, because without levity, life is indeed empty. Or because we can't figure out why you are bothering us with information meeting the definitions of a) or b) above. And all of us are too busy to bother with someone who can't, or won't, be clear in what they are trying to communicate.

Finally, since you seem to think we are stupid, or unwise, or unknowledgable, I would suggest to you that you look right below the names of your respondents, at how many answers they've given, and how many GA (for Good Answer) they've been accorded by others on the forum. None of us lust after GAs, but they are a mark of quality in an answer, conferred by one's peers on the forum. And consider that in any 5 respondents for whom you exhibit such disrespect, taken at random, there are a cumulative total of at least 120 years of service in their respective fields of science and engineering. How many years do you have in your field? And do you still want to REQUIRE us to answer your nonsensical questions, expecting that WE owe YOU respect you won't show us?

In two words - Not likely.

__________________
Been away a while. Miss all my old friends. Some of you I KNOW are still around. Where are the rest?
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#25
In reply to #23

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:09 AM

Yes you are correct in spelling problems, Althought it seems that not all CR4's are stupid, Maybe just not thinking before speeking truth. I am sure that some high IQ' s are with thought & do have the common sence to be able to do good things.

On the other hand someone over two years ago the best post to some of my questions gave the best answer ever, When GOD gives you a project from nature that is proven in seprate parts with 1 small problem of HOW TO do something and it's so simple others overlook it. Maybe with thought you have experanced the how to do something knowing most will not give it a second thought. What would you do if it will change the planets environment? GIVE UP! Not a even a thought, I will never give up on what my God challenaged me to do. It's some good hearted people out there that can read something with misspelled words & still understand it.

I have posted the renewable thermal(wind)=power for public awearness information to let the common folk know that there are a better local approuch to the costly of a community owned power systems from nature without some big company or other country.

The questions are from the basics high school, Butyet when reading the bigger terms it's not understood the simpleist HOW TO.

If Real common people can read with thought of our environment get involved it can be done sooner into action instead of making fun of it's messager.

In most part the CR4 community is a smart group of High IQ's and generaly give good answers but not all think clearly.

Someone that is differant realy gets people to think other than degrading ,WHY?

I have 40 years of my life deveoted to this system from the best research Unv. around the world, And most can't rap their minds around the concept.

Just look at some of the answers to the questions and see what I mean, some have no clue of why things happen around them.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 3)
4
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: No. VA, USA (No, it does NOTu mean "won't go"!)
Posts: 1796
Good Answers: 75
#33
In reply to #25

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 2:53 PM

Thank you. What you intended is much clearer now. You commented that "some have no clue of why things happen around them", and that, too, is right, in my opinion. Unfortunately, we see this on CR4 often, with people asking questions in which their intent is clearly that WE should do THEIR homework for them, because they have no clue to how to apply what they are learning.

I put the blame for this inability though, squarely on the educational systems, at least in the US. I teach as a volunteer, and the fact that I am not constrained by all of the formalities facing a paid teacher allows me to concentrate where it seems most necessary. What I find in my teaching is that, at all ages, students are curious, and if allowed, and even encouraged, will experiment with what they know, to see HOW it applies, which leads them then to where YOU are in your experience.

Unfortunately, at least in the US, our educational system forces SCIENCE teachers to spend entirely too much of the time which should be spent on science, and related, supporting subjects, such as advanced math, on the "administrivia" of social learning, reports to parents/other teachers/administrators, and even to file cabinets where the reports are merely stored, with the overall result the students are

a)bored with science which has no time to come from anywhere OTHER than books, and

b)frustrated with the inability to actually APPLY what they are learning, and see how it works.

In my volunteer work, I strive to meet the needs of both a) and b), so that the students go back to class with the renewed excitement that comes from knowing there is a place and a tutor who will help them to apply what they are learning, and that science is indeed a LOT of fun!

On another subject, I appreciate your answers, because, as you no doubt can see now, they enable all of us at CR4 to discuss with you what you intended, instead of reeling from your post with a "what in the world, deer in the headlights" reaction.

All of that said, may I suggest that you think carefully about how you state, or ask, what you wish to discuss, in future posts. Make it clearer to begin with, and I suspect (though I can't speak for all of us) that we'll dispense with much of the "smart ass" commentary you found so insulting.

And, no insults intended, at least on my part, but you really left us little recourse, to begin with. Careful thought in advance may alleviate a lot of that in the future.

__________________
Been away a while. Miss all my old friends. Some of you I KNOW are still around. Where are the rest?
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Anonymous Poster #1
#34
In reply to #33

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 4:19 PM

GA

When I posted my first spelling comment, I was assuming that 'southern IN' (biased by the name kenny...) indicated southern Indiana. Now it looks like that must mean southern India. Perhaps it's a weakness on my part, but I commonly have great difficulty understanding those help desk folks that speak British English with a strong Indian accent.

Either:

1. Kenny... has some difficulty translating his ideas from his first language into English.

or

2. Kenny... uses a totally different thought process than mine. (Mine is based on the scientific method and Boolean logic.)

There may be a third explanation that escapes me...

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#37
In reply to #34

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:02 PM

Yes you may have something there!

But your wrong I do live in southern Indiana, The weakness is from to many head injury's while in the army affects some speech & spelling . Of course if you had read the first 3 pages of the energy site you would have known that. It is clear that you scan read & therefore you miss important things.

That dosen't mean the sceince is not at the stage of development of construction phase, Proto type cost is from my disabilty monies and is not cheap to build.

Now with that said about me and where I am at is understood maybe some respect for my 22 years of services to our country in the army. Now whats your problem with a better approuch to help our planets' environment. You may have a problem with my spelling, It should be focose on th facts not my misspelled words.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Fans of Old Computers - PDP 11 - New Member Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 2168
Good Answers: 71
#38
In reply to #37

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:13 PM

I'm sorry but I seem to have missed the post with the link to the site. Could you please post it again?

__________________
Tom - "Hoping my ship will come in before the dock rots!"
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#40
In reply to #38

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:30 PM

Yes The energy site is all 1 word lower case renewablethermalwindpower.com

Do not scan read the sites pages! you will miss it, NOT a solar tower, Not a wind balde system, Not a solar collector.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Fans of Old Computers - PDP 11 - New Member Technical Fields - Architecture - New Member Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Maine, USA
Posts: 2168
Good Answers: 71
#45
In reply to #40

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:56 PM

Thank you for the link. I suggest you get someone to assist you with the grammar and spelling to make it look more professional. Then as others have suggested...add some real content!

I'd also suggest that if you are serious, then you should have a page with information about yourself, your resume etc., and what experience you have in this area that helped you form these ideas.

__________________
Tom - "Hoping my ship will come in before the dock rots!"
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Anonymous Poster #1
#46
In reply to #37

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 9:44 PM

So there was a third possibility! I certainly do appreciate your service to the country, and can accept head injuries as a reason for the terrible English.

I couldn't have read the first three pages of the energy site since, like Tom, I missed the link, wherever it may have been originally. Now that I have seen the first page, and looked briefly at a couple of pages of the PDF, my impression returns to my original one: this is an attempt of a single individual with virtually no knowledge beyond high school physics (if that), and lacking even high school communication skills, to advertise, design, and build a system that would have to be designed by a team of experts in multiple fields, in order to be successful.

On the other hand, knowing you have those difficulties, find someone who can edit your text before posting it. No educated investor is going to read your site as it now appears and be convinced to invest in your project.

At the top of your home page are three images. Although I believe the center image has no place in such a website, I would expect that clicking on one of those images, or perhaps on the text below each, would take me to another page. Clicking on yours does nothing.

I suffer from dyslexia myself, so I always re-read everything I write, before I send it to its destination. Clearly you should too! (note that 'too', meaning also, has 2 'o"s.)

Which God are you referring to, Zeus or Thor, or perhaps Vulcan?

In summary, I tend to agree with Lyn...

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1895
Good Answers: 44
#83
In reply to #37

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 11:33 AM

Did you come up with you ideas for alternative energy before or after you fell and hit your head?

I read your "papers"...

In your System Explanation (Microsoft Word document) none of the links, save 2, are valid. All except those two returned 404's. One is a magazine article which just talks about renewable energy, which is a no-brainer article...yes, we know renewable energy is good. You seriously need to update your links...you have no references to your "system".

Have you filed any Environmental Impact Statements? Do you have an EIS/OEIS draft for any of these "systems"? Do you have any statement from the EPA regarding these projects? What is the estimated take for migratory waterfowl and endemic species? What about SPL's for neighboring communites?

With regard to the nonequilibrium field theory; what are the effects of transportation on quantum fields, nonequilibrium phase transitions, nucleation and transport of topological defects and other nonlinear coherent structures, and what fundamental issues with regard to the quantum-classical transition and the coherent control of quantum systems do you foresee?

Register to Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#84
In reply to #83

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 11:59 AM

Wow! Cuba Pete, you really have command of the quantum statistical lingo breadbasket, or was that a handbasket? I also got the 404 treatment.

I like the idea of convection energy plants simply because they require insolation to operate, and this usually coincides with peak electrical demand in the part of the United States where the insolation is the greatest.

The major issues that have been run into is the (1) the extremely high construction costs, (2)failure to completely reach design power output in the smaller prototype plants (as I seem to recall), and (3) the pesky (or not) abundance of plant growth due to collection of condensation moisture under the sloped canopy (which is not bad if you are in Mexico trying to grow eggplants and tomatoes).

Notwithstanding all of this, along with the need to place at least a transparent membrane over large tracts, and a very tall tower in the hub - the idea is of some merit that at least one Australian firm has published plans to build on larger scale ,(although I noticed that the largest planned construction in Australia was recently cancelled for lack of funds). As far as I know, the Arizona plan is still on.

OP thinks he has a better idea, but I have no idea what his "claims" are as to some sort of unthought of energy at play here. I think he should go for a government grant, and at least spend the money in his local community, but good luck with the EPA involved in anything.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#107
In reply to #83

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/02/2012 10:56 AM

Cuba Pete & all ! The Environment impact statements are done by where the structure is local area, for each have varying rules. Aircraft turbulence above structure.

The Estimated take for migrate waterfowl & other species have no impact from a in closed fans Intake screens, as not like large blades, ( which are open).

Last statement, Sorry I don't have my bushel basket with me right now.

But it is clear that you have some knowledge of them maybe you can help learn others what the sufferance is in these systems and benefit by in-closed rather than open blade.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 2 for Off Topic
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#35
In reply to #33

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 4:46 PM

...and my mind is like a spring-loaded door. Firmly closed....Ha!

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: No. VA, USA (No, it does NOTu mean "won't go"!)
Posts: 1796
Good Answers: 75
#43
In reply to #35

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:51 PM

UM, OK. Sorry if I mispoke about your personally James. But I don't think I, at least, suggested any of us have closed minds. In fact, I was hopeful that I could explain to KennyNabb6 why we responded as we did, and probably always would. Shoot, the fact that I didn't chime in on the earlier levity doesn't mean I disagreed with it. Rather it meant I'm just not as quick as the rest of the guys.

I hope I didn't offend you by my explanation to, and discussion of accepted protocols with KennyNabb6.

And KennyNabb6, listen, if we can't understand what you said, even though we try (well, OK, SOME of us tried), and if you repeatedly refer to a link we can't find, search as we might, well, we STILL aren't going to get your drift. It's NOT about ignoring the spelling and focusing on content. If we can't understand the content, we're still going to be lost. Meet us halfway, dude. That's all I'm saying.

And thank you for your service. I, too, served. But you sacrificed a great deal more, and it is apparent, and appreciated.

__________________
Been away a while. Miss all my old friends. Some of you I KNOW are still around. Where are the rest?
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#48
In reply to #43

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 8:08 AM

Yes I do need help with spelling! Agreed.

Now as far as the main page of the energy site bottom center Says where to click to open page, with bottom left has items 1-6 of page links to open clearly posted.

Now the point of score for answers it seems that isn't scored by the person that ask the questions. Some replies were rated 2-4 without being scored by me, so how is that rating the good scores from somewhat stupid none ed. smart ass remarks without thought be good answers.

This site is for asking questions and getting some redrictions from well knowledgeable people.

Also some remarks are clearlly shows what I have said for years from this site some rate their own remarks to build their good answers without merait, & to think all that negitive thought if only some of that was put to woundering WHAT IF, & why? Maybe we could get some real people involved in our planets' environmentals problems, instead of saying some one needs to do something, awiting for others to get started.

Its really sad. The ed. of people really smart people without common sence don't make up IQ's but make high ed. bullies and jokejusters With the ability to wounder and ask simple questions without thought makes for a bad world of future power needs from the environment.

This post is for all whom to read and maybe be a answer to your problems & others.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#49
In reply to #43

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 9:12 AM

There is nothing on this blog worthy of being offended. Not much in life offends me, except blatant criminality. Although my wife does have the peculiar ability to get under my skin with words rather easily, seeing as the words are highly corrosive, similar to 103% sulfuric acid (oleum).

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#52
In reply to #33

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 9:47 AM

Thank you for pointing out the lack of common knowlage use from schools, The art to keep students interested in any learning experiance is asking why & pratical hands on experainces. I hope you can contune to keep it in all your teaching.

Natural earth sceinces can answer many questions in todays health & environment we have the computer modeling that can do all the campraissions & models, It's only as good as what we ask it to do with quick time. HOW TO & common sence to ask the question.

I do hope the schooling system where you are knows what you mean to your students

for opening their minds to what if & why?,

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Hobbies - RC Aircraft - New Member Hobbies - Automotive Performance - New Member Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fort Lauderdale Florida
Posts: 5708
Good Answers: 123
#24

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 7:37 AM

As of 1/1/13, all owners of breezeways will be required to set up wind generators.

Now there is a plan!

__________________
Bob
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#26

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 9:38 AM

1. Is a breaseway something like a greaseway? Or did you mean breezeway. Wind flux over an area produces pressure differences. Perhaps you left a window open. What exactly was it you measured? What did you observe?

2. Are you stating this as a general observation? I. E. - if the sun is incident on the upper metal surface, there MUST be water dripping off the undersurface? Could it be that there is water on top from morning dew, and the insolation expands the metal and allows it to leak through holes where the teaks screw in?

3. Were you expecting the draft to blow in some other direction? Again, wind pressure against the surface, and possibly a Bernoulli effect at the top of the structure where the wind velocity tends to be higher than at ground level.

4. When light is incident on any surface, a portion is absorbed, and a portion is reflected. The absorbed light is converted to heat. Heat is transferred from the surface to the surrounding air, resulting in isobaric expansion, hence the less dense air rises. Same answer on (I presume) vertical window panes.

5. Have you actually measured this effect? Any data to back up the conclusion? If indeed wind speeds increase over water, it must be you are referring to speeds near the surface which is smooth and offers no drag resistance to flux.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#27
In reply to #26

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 11:35 AM

James . You have answered most items with thought.

With that said would any body else understand if I ask what is recyling of the atmosphere using a tornado vortex & a solar heat engine would mean?

Just because the most of todays lower ed. public wouldn't have a clue, Common people, 9 th grade is where most are understanding it.

All of this is on the energy site's first 3 pages. Yet most say impossible because they miss what is in it as simple as possible Over thought is not whats needed, its reading the facts pages in item 3 on site list the facts in each possible combinations & what type materails.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#28
In reply to #27

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 11:46 AM

How about doing MY questions in post number 21? I did yours!

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
2
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#31
In reply to #27

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 12:55 PM

Why didn't you simply ask about thermal convection plants? I see where Australian interests canceled the largest project in Australia (funding issue), but apparently, the 50 MW unit scheduled for construction in Arizona is still a go (have not seen otherwise). And yes, there is condensation off the transparent ceiling of these, with reasonably moderate temperatures in the outer 2/3 of the plant radius, making it possible to operate greenhouse production within the plant.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#39
In reply to #31

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/26/2012 8:17 PM

James You are somewhat correct about the thermal transfure systems under thought around the world, only 1 problem with that is the systems that I have combined are from less costly parts that help each other inhanse to power output when caintained in a better cone shaped structure to inhanse where the fans are located & air movement in that area with 5 sizes structures smalliest structure is only 150ft tall with 300 ft base of the ground 25ft air intake.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
2
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#54
In reply to #39

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 10:26 AM

One final thought experiment:

1) suppose you build this structure with the cone shape, and that as the air warms and starts natural draft (as in a natural draft cooling tower), as the air enters the narrowest portion of the device it has increased velocity (and as most of us already know, wind power related to the fourth power of wind velocity), then this is where you would apply your wind turbine. The power produced is X, for a given day.

2) suppose further that you provide movable wind walls at the periphery of the structure at the bottom, to increase wind pressure from the incident wind on this given day, such that there is an additional incremental mass flow through the device. The power produced is now X+dX.

3) suppose further that since there is an increase in velocity at the smallest diameter portion, a vacuum can be produced that will increase the mass air flow even further. The device can now produce power that is X+dX+d'X. What are the values of d and d'? 0.1? 0.2? 0.5?

4) in your graphic on your website there is something like a "flame tornado" in the cone. What makes you believe that the air flow will be anything other than laminar flow? I do not believe you will produce a swirling effect, but I could be wrong. A swirling effect could be produced by a rotating auxiliary (fan) at ground level. But this will not really help to produce power from the device, and in fact will be a parasitic loss.

5) I calculate the available power for near 35 degree latitude (more equatorially): Insolation is reduced to 570 watts/m2. (assumption of 1000 watts/m2 at the equator). Now in one Km2(2 means squared in this case), there are 1,000,000 m2. The incident power under full sunlight is thus 570 million watts (570 MW thermal). Of the incident radiation, a portion is absorbed and converted (eventually) to heat (convection), and the remainder is scattered or specularly reflected. Assume the target reflectivity is approximately 0.5, then we are down to 285 MW thermal. If your machine is 30 m tall and has a radius of 15 m, then the base area is 706 m2, with available energy of 402 kW thermal. If the conversion efficiency of this is only 30%, then you have 120 kWe. (e is for electric). Perhaps this would be of use in rural multi-family areas, but not in an urban area.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#55
In reply to #54

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 2:02 PM

Yes you have the basic understanding with some exceptions of where the fans are located & focased on what protition of the fans to control speed on fans.

Now add the low air inlente at base is where the hydraulic cooling grids are placed to start to updraft direction starters, Instead of down drafts. Remembering this is not a stove pipe action, LOW Volume.

This starts the tornado vortex into action.

Internal thermal transfure into a cone shape nozzel with airfolw regulator speed control system on fans, low air speed adjust nozel from inner of fans to more outter ring will increase the fan speed & vis visera.

Remembering that heat is produced from the main power transfure from kenitics to hydraulics to run the gens will produce a lot of heat. The heated air molacuels move faster than cool ones. The open mas at base to the smaller part hole has increased flow rate.

Now that it is understood of what makes up the systems and it's what if known.

The bigger questions are how do we all get involved in actions to make it happen in your actions around the forum to help our world 1 community at a time for the evnironment. NOT for me, But for every one.

This is past the experiment stage, now its what tubelar skilaton frame will better fit the heat & cooling with the membarin flex both inner and outer layers without damage. Remembering that the top only has the weight of the fans and the pump cooling grid.

This will lessen the total weight to be supported. For prototype it has been suggested to use plasitc resin pipe 900 series with membraine matterals could be of hot air metrails. For others reading the post the insults was not to me but rather the insulters were just showing their lack of common sence & did not take it to be mean Just stupid remarks without thoughts.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#57
In reply to #55

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 4:23 PM

Maybe you could gain by collaborating with fellow CR4 poster joe.fordham; some of his ideas are similar.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#58
In reply to #57

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 6:48 PM

Now, there was a real piece of work!!!!! Could be a match made in Heaven.

I've unsubscribed twice now, but curiosity draws me back.

Especially since you commented.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#61
In reply to #58

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 12:40 PM

Lyn It is good that a spark of what if intered your mind and came back. At least for something to say is better than nothing, If anything to get the interest to get more information no matter how difficault to grasp at least sparking interest to what remarks bring some laughter or frounds, It's learning that even disabled people have some smiles in life.

Stay tuned for the next round of thoughtless remarks in new thread.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#60
In reply to #57

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 7:54 AM

Really! What is to gain from closed minded people on anything interesting when the lack of respect to others with comments that not only myself received but others.

It seems from all the post that I've been in it's always matched with some one speeking without thought & saying it won't work or it doesn't happen.

I get better responce from Jr. high schoolers around the country & over seas kids are more respectfull & willing to the wounder & what if than disrespecting the messenager.

We all have some degree of mis fuctions as proof of this threads responces from high IQ people, Lacking common sence it shows a stupid person rather dum.

Some are content to do the right thing, And get smart & just not say nothing if they don't know, SMART.

To all whom are real people & want to do the right thing sometimes takes longer to get anything done, But it is worth it instead of dragging one self down to the bullies leveal.

To the respect to all whom get-it thanks for your important things said with thought.

Now the question is what do you do with the information? Nothing & wait for others to take action or get involved in your area to get public awear of a lower cost to the problem.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where the sun sets on OZ
Posts: 1381
Good Answers: 28
#47
In reply to #26

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 5:16 AM

Have you heard the expression ' people in glass houses should not throw stones'?

Is a breaseway something like a greaseway? Or did you mean breezeway. In many English speaking countries S is used where in America you use Z.

Teaks screw in? Do you mean TEKS as in the proprietary name for self drilling screws?

Jim

__________________
Where's the KaBoom? There should be a KaBoom!
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#56
In reply to #47

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/27/2012 3:07 PM

OK, ty for correcting my ignorance.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where the sun sets on OZ
Posts: 1381
Good Answers: 28
#59
In reply to #56

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 6:27 AM

No wukkers mate.

__________________
Where's the KaBoom? There should be a KaBoom!
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#63
In reply to #47

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 3:03 PM

Some time while in the army some one said when a differant country for long one starts useing that way of speeking OK. It's always nice to get a smile, rathern a laugh at others expense because you fail to real( lize) it back fires to the you, for your replies others now see the less common sence High IQ' with no smarts.

Thanks for giving me a good run on remakes I hope you will countunie the showing interest.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 11)
Guru

Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 42355
Good Answers: 1693
#62

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 12:55 PM

<unsubscribes, again>

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#65

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 8:29 PM

Can I get a honest recap of what you were/are after with this thread?

Are you attempting to explain these phenomenon or are needing them explained to you?

Register to Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - Let's keep knowledge expanding Engineering Fields - Retired Engineers / Mentors - Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: North America, Earth
Posts: 4528
Good Answers: 106
#66
In reply to #65

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 10:10 PM

It seems to me that he (Kenny) is trying to teach us something, but we are all so dumb, it's not going to happen. I have better things to do. by, by

__________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” - Richard Feynman
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#69
In reply to #66

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/29/2012 12:04 AM

Yes trying to teach what you forgot, No not all are dumb just lack common sence, some are just stupid and can't learn anything. CLOSE MINDED. Lack the abbility to wounder & ask how come , why does this happen, what if we can?

It is a same that other countries high school kids ask me why aren't Americans doing what they can to inspire learning in earth sceinces to help the environment with technologies that are here in the US. What can I tell them the truth, Lack of opening their mind to what if is possible & use common sence. Thats why.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#67
In reply to #65

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 10:18 PM

Alas, it would be a recrap.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#68
In reply to #65

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/28/2012 11:46 PM

Yes recap Inspirring the WHAT IF thought process when explainning how to use these phenomenon to simple folk with High & low IQ's with common sence, one without the other doesn't work that is clear.

Like pointed out earlier in Jr.high school simple known power when combined into 1 structure as a catainment chamber is in site with structure desgins from new technologies can be less costly to a community than big blade wind mills & large solar panels which both are batter storage.

The energy site is what makes up its internal parts , Not how to build it in blue print.

Facts from other researchers that have proven them in test & papers to prove it. Not from ME.

I am the HOW TO person that has assyembled the 8 naturals with 6 man made thermal transfure systems & structure desgin.

The point of this was to see how many people really care about how to help understand whats at stake in our planets' environmental problems & and a way to do something other than nothing at all except complaine.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#70
In reply to #68

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/29/2012 1:18 AM

So when does the indepth explaining start?

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#71
In reply to #70

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/29/2012 6:50 AM

It's really to much to start the indepth all at once, First one needs to be awear of what happens around them that can be used in a control chamber structure. If you are like some here and think what is the point of this Understanding the elemmites & why they happen is hard enough for most.

The energy site documents tell most of it not just by me but really smart common senices Proffissors that are far beond most people's own IQ way out there, Including me.

Stay in the discussion on new threads, It may bring some lite to your darkness of sight, & wounder.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply
2
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#74
In reply to #71

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/29/2012 9:56 AM

I have carefully examined your web site. From the information presented, I believe that this device will cost too much to build to get a return on investment. The turbines will need to be supported way up there, and will need maintenance. The material the device is made from will need to be stainless steel, steel and concrete...all of which use huge amounts of energy to create in the first place, and use more to shape and form into turbines. There are other and cheaper ways to do what you want to do.

One thing stands out however, and that the concept of a tube which will move air from "down here" to "up there", which "might" result in humid ground air being sent up to form rain clouds. That might be worth developing. Certainly lots of money has been spent on rainmakers through the years. Its been tried.

There are similar devices in the Science Fiction Literature, some wacky, some high tech to the point of incomprehensibility like Magnetohydrodynamics, some which have questionable Return on Investment like wind and tidal power but they at least have the advantage of being green. Gosh knows there is plenty of coal and alternative bio-mass which can be turned into energy even now.

And there is plenty of paranoia and conspiracy theories about suppression of new technology...seems anytime anybody comes up with something like a car which runs on water or similar device, the "big oil interests" (or whatever) either buy up the idea or kill the inventor. Yes, people DO believe this. That just confuses things and makes alternative energy proponents look wacky...if it were true, then reputable magazines such as Science and Mechanics and Popular Science would be shut down, yet...they propose an alternative energy solution in nearly every issue!

There may be a future in this idea. By its nature, it will be expensive, and nobody I know would be willing to invest the couple million it would take to create a pilot plant. I figure I would like to see an example of one in action...say a smokestack in an unused factory. Put a wind generator in the base of it and see what power you get out of the smokestack. Lots of smokestacks around the US not being used! Why do you suppose there is no tornado wind happening when the sun warms the stack late in the day? Or maybe there is...anybody here on CR4 have a smokestack in their plant which does this?

however my original question still remains...WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM US? An evaluation of whether it will work? An evaluation on whether it will work well enough to provide a return on investment? There is nothing on your web site which would be specific enough to evaluate in any way, and so virtually all of the experienced engineers here simply dismiss you out of hand. Think about that...the combined experience of all the engineers who have weighed in on this topic likely exceed a couple of centuries. This is a TOUGH CROWD!

So what do you want?

A paper trail to prove that YOU were the inventor? Investment in this idea?

To a large extent Kenny, you have re-invented the wheel. Solar updraft towers have been built, and information was gleaned from them before they were taken down. There is one planned for the Arizona desert which optimistic estimates suggest an ROI in only 2 and a half years. Yeah.... (insert eye roll here). The one in Spain was taken down before it had a chance to prove itself, and EnviroMission is planning a grouping of them in Australia. Kenny, have you considered going to work for EnviroMission?

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#76
In reply to #74

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/29/2012 4:20 PM

Sorry Had something to do. Now back to the structure matreails & cost.

No where did I say stainless steel concreate like the nuke towers.

Remember that recycled plastic ressians have come a long way in structure tubes & I-beams that have greater strienght than Iron & concreate, & is a more flexable materail. Also this will lower our land feilds.

Now also the fans are aircraft recycled jet fans,Not open blade type. Fans are inclosed in the cone shape narrow end. The jet fans can be dammanaged some because they only go no more than 100 rpm not thousands.

This is only in the 2 smaller structures, The larger structures can be built like tall condows outside the inside shape remains the same shap as a cone inner, Housing & renewable energy together. Thus lower cost per structure useable inner ground space.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#77
In reply to #74

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 9:13 AM

Thread reply over-cap.

It seems that any body with disabilities are automatically dismissed from having smart knowledge of whats' going on around them by so called engineers with closed minds, & then we wounder why America is falling behind the rest of the world.

Does it make you a better person than that of a disabled?

AS far as the systems talked about here Has already been studied by I am sure more current Physic's engineers than your so called group, As stated in the energy site documents.

As far as being documented who is the inventor has intellectual property rights years ago also stated in site.

Now if your so called engineers group is real people & have information on how to do something no matter small that has a environmental impact as engineers wouldn't you do what you could to prove it instead of denning your groups abilities.

Talking together as a world group can really change together the betterment of our country.

A real engineer no matter of what type engineer should be open mind to what if.

The facts are there & it's what your so called group can do nothing to at least spark thought is up to you But at least it's out there for thought to all.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: No. VA, USA (No, it does NOTu mean "won't go"!)
Posts: 1796
Good Answers: 75
#81
In reply to #77

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 10:45 AM

KennyNabb6:

Tone it down. I am tired of your "so called" anything statements with reference to us. I have voiced a conciliatory tone in many posts in this thread, to you, and more specifically to the thread.

But I am weary of your insults. You used the preface "so called" several times in the previous post, and have done little besides challenge us as (implied) idiots, called us closed minded, implied that we are bigots. Note, you've implied this about US, as a whole. If you have specific people in mind, have the guts to speak directly. I'm tired of hearing it, and I can tell you absolutely that your insults drive me, personally, AWAY from doing anything you suggest.

If you can't speak in a softer tone, I will lodge a complaint with the admins, and ask them to ban you from further posting.

Note, I will do no such thing if the only thing at stake is an idea with which I may or may not agree, as you have the right to state your idea, and even to stake everything you own on it. But you do not have the right to come into OUR house, and insult us, because some of us disagree with you.

So, son, as one vet to another, tone it down, or turn it off. Neither of us can afford to alienate everyone around us.

__________________
Been away a while. Miss all my old friends. Some of you I KNOW are still around. Where are the rest?
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#91
In reply to #77

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 7:02 AM

There may be a future in this idea. By its nature, it will be expensive, and nobody I know would be willing to invest the couple million it would take to create a pilot plant. I figure I would like to see an example of one in action...say a smokestack in an unused factory. Put a wind generator in the base of it and see what power you get out of the smokestack. Lots of smokestacks around the US not being used! Why do you suppose there is no tornado wind happening when the sun warms the stack late in the day? Or maybe there is...anybody here on CR4 have a smokestack in their plant which does this?

however my original question still remains...WHAT DO YOU WANT FROM US? An evaluation of whether it will work? An evaluation on whether it will work well enough to provide a return on investment? There is nothing on your web site which would be specific enough to evaluate in any way, and so virtually all of the experienced engineers here simply dismiss you out of hand. Think about that...the combined experience of all the engineers who have weighed in on this topic likely exceed a couple of centuries. This is a TOUGH CROWD!

So what do you want?

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where the sun sets on OZ
Posts: 1381
Good Answers: 28
#72
In reply to #68

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/29/2012 8:22 AM

From my viewpoint, 'common sense' dictates that the more complex the design the less chance the Earth will be kind enough to give you the power required to drive the many different parts of the system that you have built. To harness the very power that you wish to harness could probably done more simply by refining your design and if you take the time to listen to the helpful advice of the people on this forum.

It appears to me that you have hyped yourself up to an almost religious fervor and concluded that any person who isn't "with you" MUST be against you and, of course, Mother Earth. This simply isn't true. The time is rapidly approaching where oil will be unavailable to supply energy and the big part of town will beat down your door to get their hands on the new methods to harness natural power. Your task is to make it work. It is clear from what you have said that you can't do this on your own.

SO, in a nutshell, open your ears and your mind to the advice given to you when you eventually get around to asking for specific advice.

You can have your soapbox back now.

__________________
Where's the KaBoom? There should be a KaBoom!
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 3)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#73
In reply to #72

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/29/2012 9:06 AM

It seems that what is meant by can't do it myself is close to the truth! The skills needed to do this is not the question?

The question should be What if this is more powerfull than tought?

Why I can't do this myself is cost! and for what resaon? after all look at what the cost to our planets' environment is. The cost of a nuke plant is high, and risk is to most not well placed.

Truth, Mother nature is not the only thing in play here, you are forgeting the man made thermals & structure desgins.

In well published white papers & writings from other energy researhers are facts Backing the systems in question. It's always the how to combine them, with modern technologies.

This systems is the refining of over 2oo known things narrowed to what is listed over last 40 years of research. Any thing removed will lessen it's power output Then it will not work(physsics ) will not allow it.

You have it backwards the hyp is from a higher power (religious) yes only god could guide me to this out come for I am just a simple person with the abbility to listen and hear what most can't see, Only with faith can we overcome.

By the way I wasn't awear I was on a pedistal! Thanks for apointing that out, I thought I was on the ground Well just hovering maybe.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 6)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#75
In reply to #65

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/29/2012 2:17 PM

NO, attempting to explaining how to use the phenomenon in a renewable energy systems explainations have been done back in the early 1960's it's how to use the knowladge in what cantainment chamber structure.

Indepth explainations can be done by sponcered public ED awearness events as stated in the energy sites' public awearness flyer. incased you missed it all 1 word renewablethermalwindpower.com

Hydraulic systems information done by parker Industrail research & development divission, Air vac pressure systems done by Triad Technologies Affelliates of companies.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#82
In reply to #75

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 11:21 AM

"renewable - thermal - wind - power" = solar, as every other form of "renewable" energy is, except for maybe geothermal, that is part tidal energy (from the moon - so is it lunacy?) and part nuclear energy, and this set up the rotating core of our planet, hence the magnetic field that makes our planet "safe" for life to thrive.

No energy is totally renewable #1: conservation of energy, and the second law of thermodynamics proves this - in that no one can just pull energy from nothing, and no system can take in and exhaust heat isothermally and produce net work.

All wind power is due to convection for that is what weather is basically comprised of (in a high order non-linear dynamic system) along with evaporation and condensation of water resulting in precipitation, etc., and a few other niceties such as lightening.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#96
In reply to #82

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 10:36 AM

Very well put! Now take all that you have said and look more closer to all the combinations in nature and apply structure design with engineer what if the tower does not Exhaust heat! thats why on the picture the top section is shade in BLUE( what color represent) COLD thats where the refraction comes in to play.

Thermal basic es Remember your 1st line!? now apply them.

Question NOT armed OK

Look at the picture of the structure & apply to ways of approach Goods, & bads from type structure Engineering design, goods & bads form refrigeration, Hydraulics the same.

Now apply the basics for created suction updrafts as Vacuum.

What is induced thermal Vacuum?

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#85
In reply to #75

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 3:15 PM

OK I get-it.

I take it the engineering community hasn't heard of shared technologies before.

this has been internationally formed over 20 years ago with a lot of known & proven tech & good people that has come to the forefront to be combined in some manner in 1 structure. Physics in engineering & mech proven by engineers. Sound better.

To doubt and call it gubbish is only to those whom aren't up to date on facts.

I have also not insulted any body that hasn't ask for it from replies to me because of my disability. Not way to approach any person. But at least I have a dysfunction in which I make clear, That doesn't mean I will take it without giving it back. Not to be mean but thats the way it is.

Now as fare baning the public views most often does more harm than good some have a thought process & input than others.

So ! do what you want with what you have & hope the next time thing CR4 people makes replies may think before downing a project. It only hurts us all.

AS fare as having the guts to name people They know whom they are without me bringing them up to all. Maybe !

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 3)
Guru
Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Engineering Fields - Piping Design Engineering - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Richland, WA, USA
Posts: 21017
Good Answers: 795
#86

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 4:24 PM

This thread needs to be euthanized.

__________________
In vino veritas; in cervisia carmen; in aqua E. coli.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#87

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 6:30 PM

Well I for one have rather enjoyed this thread. Granted it has yet to educate me on a single darned thing related to hot air rising water condensation forming or any other things the OP claims can yield great levels of harnessable energy from mundane and minute physical manifestations of nature that don't add up to anything practical or of substantial use until scaled up to unrealistically vast proportions.

So as for the OP. Kenny what exactly is your brain injury anyway and what specific region of the brain is it affecting?

I figure I might as well ask since my question about when the concepts and implied working principals of your imagined creation have yet to ever be covered.

By the way I too checked out your website and read it in detail and I as well could get very little useful or practical information regarding your design other than its referenced to a lot of things that don't add up or check out being plausibly true in any online searches I ran and believe me I am rather good at running obscure facts and data collecting online searches.

As far as putting a nearly half mile diameter and quarter mile high thermal Teepee in my back yard that only generates around 200 - 400 MW for all its size costs and complexities and that only works when the sun is shining you can for get it. I too have far better things I can do with that land that will waste money and piss off the neighbors for years to come as well.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#88
In reply to #87

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 6:59 PM

Well I am glade to be the blunt of jokes to some & maybe smiles to others!

As far as facts maybe from the naturals that are known and documented are from something called International shared technologies for research & development of emerging structure engineering designs, Mechinaical engineering, FACTS.

Maybe the naturals confuse most peoples nornal understanding, Unless your a scenicetist atmousphare engineer.

To some one that had got bent from his own words when I repeated It, If you are tore up by your own words , REALLY GO GET BENT your own words get real dude. Maybe look at the agreement terms to be part of the form of dissicon board open to all to see.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 3)
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where the sun sets on OZ
Posts: 1381
Good Answers: 28
#89
In reply to #88

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 7:24 PM

http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/66679#newcomments

Copy and paste this thread in your browser. Once viewed come back and apologise to all those you insulted by saying they have a closed mind and can't see the things in nature that you see.

__________________
Where's the KaBoom? There should be a KaBoom!
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 4)
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#90
In reply to #89

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

11/30/2012 9:08 PM

WOW! If you have been keeping up with comments to me it's clear whom should be apologise for insults sometimes by them self's & not by me.

This form agreement understanding the degrading and naming is forbidden, But yet I have received it and there for responded in kind some of what offends some is ( their words) shows their own dysfunctions, I have a disability so whats the rest is problem's shouldn't be placed with me. They point it out. SO.

If you don't want to be in a disscion thread then don't but others want to hear common seance remarks with thought NOT being bullish about it.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 6)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#94
In reply to #88

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 8:15 AM

Look at it this way.

If three people don't understand what you are talking about the fault could very well could be with them.

However if 30+ educated and experienced people cant follow what you are talking about the fault is probably with you!

As far as handicaps go there are a number of people here who have them in one fashion or another. I also know a number of people who I deal with in life quite regularly myself who have what could be considered handicaps of all sorts as well. One of my best friends is missing his entire right arm but I don't consider him handicapped and nether does he. (Except when trying to drive a skid steer or hold a nail and hammer it in at the same time.)

The thing is no one here has said anything about you having a handicap but you and even then when asked politely about what it is you went on the defensive which to me pretty much says you are the primary source of the communication problem here not anyone else. Multiple people have asked you to explain things that you seem to think you know more about than they yet not once have you given a single coherent or relevant response regarding said questions.

Register to Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#97
In reply to #87

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 11:31 AM

Your backyard is that large? How exactly would this apply in North Dakota - large solar convection? Do you even have air conditioners in North Dakota?

Besides the energy produced during peak demand time of the day, there is also the impressively large greenhouse under the canopy, that apparently needs little to no water from outside sources, so your neighbors don't like vegetables, huh?

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#98
In reply to #97

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 11:42 AM

Isn't everyones back yard that large?

As far as farming and vegetable go we generally don't have much problems with growing them here as is.

Yes we do have air conditioners as well. And larger than average heat systems too! (Some days my wife likes to run both at the same time as well.)

As far as viable AE goes we are the wind capital of North America so there is not much need fore fancy contraptions here. Put up a pole put some blades and a generator on it and you can get lots of free power here.

Even if the wind doesn't blow we have enough oil wells and natural gas supply to power most of the US on an average day but thats a whole different topic.

Register to Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member Engineering Fields - Chemical Engineering - Old Hand

Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 14331
Good Answers: 162
#99
In reply to #98

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 12:06 PM

Yes, I know how well blessed North Dakota is and apparently you are as well, my friend.

I sort of like the vortex idea, but you and I can agree that the force may not be intensive enough to dirve a conventional bladed GE turbine, and I tend to have my doubts about spiral designed vertical axid radial flow wind turbines.

My grandfather in West Texas was one of the first to use windmills for irrigation of farm land (larger machines than the ranchers had), in a limited way, because no one would be able to water 300 acres with this. He also had a windcharger that charged his battery bank so they had lighting and radio way back in the 1910's.

__________________
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just build a better one.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#100
In reply to #98

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 2:47 PM

True!

Your last line here thought is the bigger question that is why this discussion form thread was intended to address.

simple question NOT loaded OK.

Remember when you were little and had a bike & had it upside down washing off the mud on the wheels with a hose?

The wheel spins faster on outer tire & as you wash the spook es towards the center it slowed down, Or yard art spinners, OK now take a cone small end facing the spinner, What happens?

Now I ask you for the cost for large bladed can produce the same amount if it had a wind cone nozzle on the fans are enclosed?, Whats the sufferance?

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: South of Minot North Dakota
Posts: 8376
Good Answers: 775
#101
In reply to #100

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 3:09 PM

"The wheel spins faster on outer tire & as you wash the spook es toward the center it slowed down, Or yard art spinners, "

Nope! all of my wheels have always spun at the same RPM in the inner areas as they did at the outer radius points.

As far as the wheel ls lowing down as the water stream approaches the center that is simple physics. The surface area that the water stream contacts remains about the same and the supply pressure remains the same however the effective torque it can produce is smaller (less leverage) while the drag on the outer area of the tire has become proportionally greater (air drag plus water slinging) than that of the energy being put in by the water stream.

No mystery here for me and no free energy either.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Southern IN.
Posts: 219
#102
In reply to #101

Re: Common Natural Power Not Realized

12/01/2012 5:37 PM

OK I hope all remember the snapper riding mower system ! the larger plate disc spun the smaller freewheel! Same exempale. OK. The same is true in kinetic to mach.

Are we close now, but your on the right track OK.

So look at the last discussion for the formula.

__________________
Renewable energy Researcher/Inventor
Register to Reply Score 1 for Off Topic
Register to Reply Page 1 of 2: « First 1 2 Next > Last »
This discussion was "closed" on 12/03/2012 10:23 AM. No new comments are allowed.
Message from admins:
The thread has devolved into posts that violate the User Policies, so it's being closed.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (3); bob c (1); Codemaster (1); cuba_pete (4); James Stewart (12); JIMRAT (5); kennynabb6 (41); kramarat (2); leveles (1); lyn (8); micahd02 (6); ormondotvos (1); passingtongreen (1); StandardsGuy (3); tcmtech (8); Tom_Consulting (3); Tornado (6); Yusef1 (7)

Previous in Forum: How Frictional Force Effects a Bullet While Spinning And Non-Spinning   Next in Forum: Variable Automatic Transmission

Advertisement