Hemmings Motor News Blog Blog

Hemmings Motor News Blog

Hemmings Motor News has been around since 1954. We're proud of our heritage, but we're also more than the Hemmings full of classifieds that your father subscribed to. Aside from new editorial content every month in Hemmings, we have three monthly magazines: Hemmings Muscle Machines, Hemmings Classic Car and Hemmings Sports and Exotic Car.

While our editors traverse the country to find the best content for those magazines, we find other oddities related to the old-car hobby that we really had no place for - until now. With this blog, we're giving you a behind-the-scenes look at what we see and what we do during the course of putting out some of the finest automotive magazines you'll ever read.

Previous in Blog: Blinded by the Light: Why Bright Headlights Rule the Road and How You Can Avoid Them   Next in Blog: Automotive Hall of Fame Rethinks How It Recognizes Industry's Leaders
Close
Close
Close

No, There's No Such Thing As a 1964-1/2 Ford Mustang

Posted February 22, 2023 5:00 AM by dstrohl
Pathfinder Tags: Ford mustang

The designation's so widespread, it's almost become gospel among Mustang enthusiasts and the collector car world in general. You'll see 1964-1/2 as a model year in the titles of Mustang books, in prior Hemmings articles (nostra culpa), even on Ford's own website. Except, officially, Ford never designated any Mustang as a 1964-1/2 model year car.

"All of the first production Mustangs built from February 10, 1964, through July 31, 1964, were titled as 1965 model year cars," according to Robert Fria, an expert in pre-production and early production Mustangs who wrote the definitive book on the subject, "Mustang Genesis: The Creation of the Pony Car." As Fria and many others have pointed out, just looking at the VIN of any early production Mustang should bear that out: All of them - whether the one Fria discovered with serial number 100002 or the one that Captain Stanley Tucker bought with serial number 100001 - start with the digit 5 for the 1965 model year.

Case closed, really short article, right? So then why did the 1964-1/2 "model year" become so widespread to the point where it gets its own entry in year-by-year Mustang reference books and where the Mustang Club of America reportedly considers 1964-1/2 as a separate model year?

Part of it comes down to the introduction of the Mustang in April 1964, well out of line with the traditional model year cycle: The rest of the 1965 Fords didn't debut until that September. While unusual in comparison with prevailing trends through the rest of the industry, it was actually in line with Ford's mid-year introductions of the Falcon Futura and Galaxy 500XL Sports Hardtop the year prior, as Brad Bowling pointed out in the "Standard Catalog of Mustang" (which, incidentally, has an entire section on the "1964-1/2" Mustang). Indeed, given the success of such introductions - the Mustang essentially had the field to itself when it came to new-car publicity that spring, and that introduction date may have even been key to the avalanche of first-year sales - one has to wonder why we haven't seen many subsequent mid-year introductions. (Outside of unintentional ones like the 1970-1/2 Camaro, its introduction delayed by a strike.)

Read on for more...

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Previous in Blog: Blinded by the Light: Why Bright Headlights Rule the Road and How You Can Avoid Them   Next in Blog: Automotive Hall of Fame Rethinks How It Recognizes Industry's Leaders

Advertisement