One of the most common tools for process improvement is a freeze frame camera with a “reliable trigger”. What I mean by reliable trigger does not include a PLC because of cycle time jitter. Instead, it is better to find a reliable trigger in the form of some continuous motion compared to a timer (clock rate) or counter. But don’t choose a reference time that is reset by a PLC because it will not be precisely repeatable. Instead, look for a cam or other device that denotes a cycle with high precision such as teeth on a gear. A PLC may also look for teeth on a gear but when it gets around to detecting that tooth is a function of cycle time (and synchronization that has been overlooked.) Consequently, you may have to build your own trigger that uses high speed electronics without (dead) cycle time.
Since every machine is different, what kind of trigger can you find that will indicate the same point in the process every time a cycle changes? That is what your engineering training was trying to teach you. But what can it mean? Well, it depends on what your process is but the savings can be much higher than expected. This has been the case for countless improvements. High repeatability and precision go hand in hand. Accuracy is over rated if repeatability is poor. I have several stories I could share but I’m more interested in the issues you are trying to prove. Reply if you want to see some improvements.
__________________
A great troubleshooting tip...."When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Comments rated to be Good Answers:
Comments rated to be "almost" Good Answers: