I have a vinyl lined in ground swimming pool that has started leaking. I have checked all the usual places for leaks (skimmer, intake/outtake lines etc.) I have experience with all this stuff, so I am convinced there is a hole in the liner.
I had a bright idea. Since the pool is vinyl, it should be insulated from ground. The water is conductive (lots of chemicals). The water must be going to ground. Therefore, there must be conductivity from the pool water to ground.
My hope was that by hooking one side of a power supply to ground and using the other side as a probe in the pool as monitoring the current flow, I could find the leak. With the probe far away from the leak, current would be low. Close to the leak, the current would go up.
I removed all possible connections from ground to the pool (ladders etc.)
Well, the first part is true. I detect 40-90 mA current depending on the voltage (25-50 V). However, this current is pretty constant everywhere in the pool, so it does not give me a clue whether I am close or far away from the leak. Simulating a leak (by placing a ground wire into the pool), I do get an increase in current when I get close to the "leak". However, the current increase over the pool "background" current is pretty low (4-10 mA) and I have to get very close to the "leak" to see any increase (within an inch or so).
I have tried AC and DC. I Have tried to monitor current between the power supply and the probe. I have put both ground and power supply wires in the water, and monitored current between ground and the probe etc. All of these methods give pretty much the same results: the only significant current increase is within inches of the "leak".
I get electrolysis (bubbles) using this technique, so I have even tried this. I attach the power supply between the pool and ground, and look for bubbles which should occur at the leak. However, the bubbles are pretty small, so I have not been able to spot the leak this way either.
There is a commercial device that seems to work called "Leaktrac", explained in US patent 5640096. It is a bit different from what I'm doing, but I don't quite understand the differences.
I would be happy to contract with a company that uses this devise, but they are booked through August. I would even be willing to rent one, but can't find a source. To buy, they are about $1500, which is too rich for my blood. I am loosing about 1" water/day.
Any suggestions, explanations or better ideas would be appreciated.
Why does the water not act as a traditional resistance (current increasing inversely proportional to distance between poles)?
Thanks in advance.
Tad