Lab Equipment Blog Blog

Lab Equipment Blog

The Lab Equipment Blog is the place for conversation and discussion about clinical and research labware, environmental technology, test and metrology, and health and safety. Here, you'll find everything from application ideas, to news and industry trends, to hot topics and cutting edge innovations.

Previous in Blog: Would You Buy Used Lab Equipment?   Next in Blog: What's Making us Fatter?
Close
Close
Close
2 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

The Early Universe Exposed

Posted December 10, 2010 7:00 AM

The Large Hadron Collider at CERN will no doubt yield a wealth of knowledge for physicists and other scientists alike. One suchexperiment known as ALICE, intends to study the properties of matter known as a quark-gluon plasma. The first results from this experiment have revealed clues about the early state of the universe. Tests colliding lead nuclei together have been interpreted to show that the early universe was hot and dense, but still behaved much like a liquid.

The preceding article is a "sneak peek" from Lab Equipment, a newsletter from GlobalSpec. To stay up-to-date and informed on industry trends, products, and technologies, subscribe to Lab Equipment today.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Member

Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 6
#1

Re: The Early Universe Exposed

12/10/2010 10:35 PM

Any questions you have should be directed to Paul Pantone

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: The Early Universe Exposed

12/28/2010 2:18 PM

It's just like the Bible says. People are wilfully ignorant of the creation. All this experimenting, looking for answers billions of years old is fruitless.

Evolution has no scientific evidence. Creation is entirely scientific. Evidence is interpreted according to your worldview. Evolutionists have a faulty worldview. It is inconsistent and irrational. How for instance to you explain galaxies that spin in different directions if everything came from a big bang? Or a reported few inches of dust on the moon, when there should be many feet of it? Or the lack of fossil evidence, all the reported intermediate fossils were either fakes, "artistic" recreations, or deliberate lies.

It's all because people want to make up there own rules. Some people don't want to have to answer to an all powerful God.

Or how about evolution. In order for something to have survival value it has to work. A half formed leg for instance would be useless and would have no survival value. So according to evolution theory it should be dropped off. Many biological things only work if all the pieces are functioning properly. This is impossible in a slow process of evolving.

amos

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 2 comments

Previous in Blog: Would You Buy Used Lab Equipment?   Next in Blog: What's Making us Fatter?

Advertisement