Common Purposes Blog

Common Purposes

What are the Common Purposes? I've dwelt on that question since first reading my alma mater's founding principle "for the purposes of instructing persons, who may choose to apply themselves, in the application of science to the common purposes of life". The question, more than any answer I may ever offer, has guided me through many personal and professional endeavors. And, if I have learned anything it is that I have derived my greatest joy when I, as part of a team, have made a lasting difference to improve the lives of others. Should the thoughts I share here and the ensuing discussion lead others to ask the same question, to seek their own answers and to experience the same joy as I, then I shall consider this effort of value.

Image: "The New Shoes" by Jane Bucci. This work is based on the touching photo snapped by Gerald Waller in 1946, in Austria. The little boy, who lived in an orphanage, had just been given new shoes by the American Red Cross.

  Next in Blog: Mr. Ober's Eggs
Close
Close
Close
Rate Comments: Nested

The Teams We Choose

Posted June 21, 2006 8:43 AM by MillMatt

The prominent news story of the day involves the fueling of a rocket in North Korea that may contain a nuclear warhead. There is the possibility, too, that the rocket has sufficient range to reach the United States. While this episode is not the first time the North Korean government has rattled its saber, the political rhetoric continues to grow as the perceived threat grows. Certainly, many are comparing this news with similar events in Iran. Recently, I read a series of articles in FORTUNE Magazine about the synergy and extraordinary results that teams have achieved. Not surprisingly, engineers have played a crucial role on many of these teams. One article, "Six Teams That Changed the World", starts with a review of Thomas Edison's Menlo Park team. As stated in the article, "He (Edison) was never the lone inventor." And so it is in North Korea and Iran. There are engineers - teams of engineers - working on their programs. There must be technicians working around the clock to prepare the rocket and buildings full of engineers who designed, developed and built the rocket and its destructive payload. Why would teams of talented people form to pursue such a program? With all the opportunity to succeed, why would engineers devote their energy to such an endeavor? With all the unmet needs in this world, why would individuals who have spent years studying math and science to better their lives choose to work on a program that has no positive value?

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33
#1

They Don't Have Real Choices

06/26/2006 9:00 AM

This is an interesting and timely piece that raises two important questions: 1) "Why would teams of talented people form to pursue such a program?", and 2) With all the opportunity to succeed, why would engineers devote their energy to such an endeavor?" With regard to the first question, we cannot assume that these men and women have a choice. As members of a totalitarian state, their lives are circumscribed and their talents controlled. With regard to the second question, we cannot assume that there are other, comparable opportunities to "succeed" in such a society. For example, there is no international market for North Korean high-tech products - other than WMD components, of course.

Reply
Reply to Blog Entry

  Next in Blog: Mr. Ober's Eggs

Advertisement