E&E Exchange Blog

E&E Exchange

Welcome to the Energy & Environment (E&E) Exchange, a blog dedicated to science and engineering topics that are (generally) related to energy and the environment. This blog is meant to encourage discussion about the challenges and possibilities surrounding sustainability through science and technology. The blog's owner, cheme_wordsmithy, is a former technical writer and engineering editor at IEEE GlobalSpec, the company that powers CR4.

Previous in Blog: The Artificial Leaf   Next in Blog: Is the Hydrogen Economy "Dead in the Water"?
Close
Close
Close
7 comments
Rate Comments: Nested

A "Super" Solution for Biofuel Production

Posted November 11, 2011 10:24 AM by cheme_wordsmithy
Pathfinder Tags: alternative fuels biofuel ethanol

One of the major limitations of large-scale ethanol production is the availability of the raw materials it requires; namely corn and sugarcane crops. Cellulosic ethanol is ethanol derived from the breakdown of cellulose, incorporating other types of feedstock; namely wood, grass, and non-edible plant parts. For years this has been an intriguing sustainable alternative to corn-based ethanol because it can be made from agricultural wastes rather than food crops. Effective utilization of these materials would make ethanol a much more economically viable alternative fuel.

How It Works

Cellulosic ethanol production involves the breakdown of lignocellulose, a structural material in plants. Lignocellulose is comprised of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Cellulose and hemicellulose contain sugar molecules (glucose and xylose, respectively) which, when freed, can then be fermented into ethanol (in the case of glucose) or sold for other processes (in the case of xylose).

Cellulose visualization. Image Credit: OLCF

The lignin component in these compounds is a large and complex molecule made of hydrogen, oxygen, and carbon. It acts as a binding and protective element to the microfibril structure of cellulose and hemicellulose. In order to produce fermentable sugars, enzymes (e.g. cellulase) or acids must break through this lignin wall in order to interact with the cellulose and hemicellulose.

In addition, lignocellulose is a compact crystalline structure, making it hard for enzymes to navigate effectively. The reality is that glucose polymer chains in cellulose are largely insoluble due to these factors.

Because of these difficulties, industrial scale production of cellulosic ethanol is just not cost effective. It generally requires expensive specialized enzymes or toxic and corrosive acids. Both processes are slow and require costly equipment to handle these substances.

Utilizing Supercritical Water

To counter this feasibility issue, a startup company name Renmatix is using supercritical water for the transformation process. The company says its method makes sugar with wood chips for the same price as with sugarcane, which has become a profitable market in Brazil.

Lignocellulosic biomass in the form of wood chips. Image Credit: Nature.com

Supercritical water is water pushed above its critical point through high temperatures and pressures into a physical state beyond liquid and gas distinction. For a fun visual example of a supercritical fluid, check out this video by Nottingham ScienceCity:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBRdBrnIlTQ

In this supercritical state, the fluid is an incredible solvent, capable of breaking down the lignocellulose in a matter of seconds. The high speed allows the plant to produce more sugar with less equipment than other methods.

There are a number of challenges with supercritical water however. The fast reactions are much harder to control, and can result in undesirable by-products if carried too far. Materials which can handle supercritical water are limited, and likely expensive. Yields of sugar/biomass also tend to be relatively small.

In the past, these problems with supercritical water have labeled it as uneconomical, so vouching for its viability may prove difficult. Renmatix has not released any details on its process, except to say that it has overcome these problems and uses two steps to break down the cellulose and hemicellulose.

Storage container for sugar production. Image Credit: Technology Review

Renmatix is pushing investors for funding to build a larger production facility to prove its process's commercial viability. Currently, the operation has only been carried out on a small scale, but Renmatix wants to raise enough money to create a plant capable of producing 100,000 tons of sugar per year.

Researcher Gary Aurand at the University of Iowa says that the process could work if Renmatix has engineered a system that incorporates only supercritical water for the dissolving step. Separating the dissolved materials into an area of lower temperature and pressure would slow down the process and could provide the control necessary to minimize some of the problems.

Regardless, the feasibility of a large-scale plant using supercritical water is questionable. There are a lot of question-marks surrounding its operation, but just as many regarding the possibilities surrounding increased biofuel production in the future.

Resources:

Technology Review (MIT)

Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF)

Center for Environmental Research & Technology at UCR

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Engineering Fields - Transportation Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Technical Fields - Procurement - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Architectural Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Marketing/Advertising - New Member Engineering Fields - Food Process Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mariposa Ca
Posts: 5800
Good Answers: 114
#1

Re: A "Super" Solution for Biofuel Production

11/12/2011 11:08 AM

thanks Cheme

for a well written blog

Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#2

Re: A "Super" Solution for Biofuel Production

11/16/2011 1:39 PM

Every time I read about the pursuit of technology like this, I have mixed feelings. Should we resign ourselves to the current energy paradigm, based largely on petroleum and bio-fuels? I understand the critical nature of the situation we as a species have created for ourselves (mostly by no population planning strategy vs. resources). Therefore, I don't begrudge the engineers and scientists working in ANY benevolent direction to help solve our need for energy. But the question of what are our real needs always comes up in my mind. Energy is used for unnecessary things. There IS waste in this regard. Readers might also find this relevant website interesting.

A large part of energy needs are for transportation and not indoor climate control and other non-transportation uses. I have struggled over the years with a gut feeling that bicycles, low tech they may be, could be part of a strategy that lessens the need for petroleum driven transportation. It seems backwards, yet appealing. I have asked myself, just how many trips in my car could be successfully done on a bicycle (like grocery shopping, etc.). My daily commute to work is the main trip that could be done, in most cases, by bicycle, rather than a car. And that happens 5 times a week. Imagine the impact that could have on a larger scale.

I never took the time to do any detailed research in this regard... until just now. In trying to find out what estimates there are for percentage of petroleum use by transportation, I found this and also this interesting website started by a man named Ken Kifer. In short order, I read that he had been tragically killed, ironically, by a drunk driver. I'll give the man this: He certainly tried to do his homework.

In a world that seems more and more to be headed for disasters on several fronts, it isn't hard to feel overwhelmed by the potential problems we face. Scientists and inventors are trying their best to contribute to the solution. We should applaud their efforts. But as private citizens, so often we ask ourselves, "What can I really do?" Well, this may be a place to start. Petroleum based life is seen through the skewed eyes of opulence, in developed countries. Developing countries would probably be happier with the basics. And maybe the basics are what we need to redefine. We don't have to give up all our toys, but...

Reply
Guru
Safety - Hazmat - New Member Safety - ESD - New Member Engineering Fields - Transportation Engineering - New Member Popular Science - Evolution - New Member Technical Fields - Procurement - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Architectural Engineering - New Member Technical Fields - Marketing/Advertising - New Member Engineering Fields - Food Process Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Mariposa Ca
Posts: 5800
Good Answers: 114
#3
In reply to #2

Re: A "Super" Solution for Biofuel Production

11/16/2011 2:44 PM

why not one more step back [tabling the 3rd rail population control issue]

community planning can also reduce our transportation needs

a community where you can walk to work & shopping greatly reduces the need for transportation, as does regional & local manufacturing, farming ect, ect

Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#4
In reply to #3

Re: A "Super" Solution for Biofuel Production

11/16/2011 5:22 PM

Yes, definitely. Imagine the reshuffling that would need to be done. I imagine a lot of people wouldn't want to give up the homes they already have just to be within walking distance of their workplace. But imagine the feeling of freedom one would have to not be so dependent on the automobile! I know that some communities have been planned according to these goals.

I only wish such planning were the norm. I don't know for sure, but I would imagine that such planning was considered more in ancient times, in cities like Rome or any larger city. But even in today's world it is at least acknowledged and given some serious thought. This article indicates just how comprehensive a thought process is needed (or should be) in thinking out solutions. The trick is how do you implement it after the fact (of unorganized, little, or no planning)? And to be fair, most cities in the U.S. are legacy, horse and carriage days, cities.

The solution you cite IS, to me, the most common sense. But unless businesses could (and/or would want to), provide the infrastructure necessary for their employees -- meaning they would actually be the center of the community, maybe even soliciting (or partnering with -- Yikes!) the other support business, like grocery stores, etc. -- it is not so easy to achieve. In some ways, it would be a little frightening, in that your employer now holds control over a larger portion of your life, by determining what stores you would have easy access to. But I think a large percentage of people would see this scenario as a lower stress lifestyle, as opposed to the non-planned version.

As I think about that idea, though, in smaller cities that have one big manufacturer (and it's hard to remember this since so many have fled the country, or gone out of business) this kind of community happens in a less organized way, just because most of the people in the town work(ed) at the factory/manufacturer. Still, I wonder how many people take/took advantage of being close enough to walk or bicycle to work?

A problem with this, alluded to above, especially in a country like the U.S., is the conflict it poses with the idea of "individual" freedom. (Which is why many people wouldn't give up their cars in any case.) No matter the convenience, some would see it as the central employer(s) now controlling people's lives too much by determining their environment. After all, if you have too many business, the distances to them may become impractical to walk to. And I think this brings up the idea that mass transit is key to any real efficient transportation planning in any city of size (and it would be some combination of population vs. sq. miles).

Sorry to type so much off your simple suggestion. It touches a nerve in me.

I hope we don't give up on the population control issue, though. That would relieve the pressure on many issues. It is so common sense. It's no different than deciding how many children you can support -- income vs. food, housing needs, educational overhead, etc.

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Good Answers: 38
#5
In reply to #4

Re: A "Super" Solution for Biofuel Production

11/16/2011 5:47 PM

I have to admit I'm writing this without reading your entire comment (I'll go back when I'm done), only because I recently made the huge change in my lifestyle that you describe in your first paragraph.

I've moved from a house about 30 miles from work to an apartment within walking distance.

A quick calculation of my direct savings totaled upwards of $800 per month. I haven't taken into account less car maintenance (general,tires,oil changes, etc.). I have an extra 2 hours worth of time in my day now and I don't have to do yard work on the weekends. I'm within walking distance of 2 grocery stores, a shopping center, a mall, one major retail outlet, several chain restaurants, and a few home-grown ones.

The decision wasn't easy, but now that it's done the benefits are so plentiful I doubt I will ever go back to commuting.

__________________
Sometimes my thoughts are in a degree of order so high even I don't get it...
Reply
Anonymous Poster #1
#6
In reply to #5

Re: A "Super" Solution for Biofuel Production

11/16/2011 5:59 PM

Excellent! I would bet that your enthusiasm would allow you to easily vocalize the merits of the decision with those whom you might influence. Did you look at the article (referenced in my first post) about bicycle vs. car costs? A bicycle, obviously, increases the range of nearness to work criteria and could be considered by some without needing to move.

Reply
Guru
Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 714
Good Answers: 38
#7
In reply to #6

Re: A "Super" Solution for Biofuel Production

11/16/2011 6:25 PM

I pulled it up and skimmed through it. I'm not sure I can agree with all of his figures, but the points he was trying to make are true enough.

There is a simple thing that helped me realize how much all the costs really add up. I remember the days in college when I could bike or walk everywhere I needed to be. I'm sure alot of you can do that... put yourself back to how you lived in college. Now remember how much income you had. If you're anything like me or the other typical student, it wasn't much, but you survived and had fun doing it!

Now imagine having the income you have now ... back then. THAT is where I am now (only without the waking up without my pants trying to figure out where I am part ).

__________________
Sometimes my thoughts are in a degree of order so high even I don't get it...
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 7 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (3); ChaoticIntellect (2); Garthh (2)

Previous in Blog: The Artificial Leaf   Next in Blog: Is the Hydrogen Economy "Dead in the Water"?

Advertisement