|
Back again. Today we'll discuss the third step in the corrosion evaluation/mitigation process
1. Identify the corrosion mechanism.
2. Understand the environment, both external and internal.
3. Understand the equipment - materials of construction, operating cycles, hours.....
4. Identify alternatives - materials, coatings, limiting operating envelope, changing the environment (water treatment, alternative lubricants/refrigerants, filter the air, etc.), redesign the machine (better drainage, eliminate contact of dissimilar metals, .....)
5. Implement change.
6. Monitor results.
3. Understand the equipment - materials of construction, operating cycles, hours…..
In the previous post in this series we discussed how important understanding the operating environment is when working to solve a corrosion problem, not surprisingly, it is just as important to understand the equipment which operates in that environment.
One of the challenges for a failure analyst working with a client to solve a corrosion problem is thoroughly understanding the equipment that is failing - what are the materials of construction, how are the materials processed, why were the materials selected, is there more than one supplier of materials or components, what is the typical duty cycle for the equipment, what are the extremes of the operating map, etc., etc., etc.?
A lot of these questions can be answered by reviewing engineering drawings and documentation, but much of this information is only available via the tribal knowledge of the people who work with, or on the equipment every day. Thus, it is crucial for design, manufacturing, service and purchasing personnel to share their tribal knowledge regarding how and why the equipment is designed and built the way it is with whoever is charged with analyzing the corrosion problem. Again, just like understanding the environment, the better we understand the equipment, the better and more robust and more economical will be the solutions that are found to address the corrosion problem.
Editor's Note: CR4 would like to thank PJ Sikorsky, GEA Consulting Associate, for contributing this blog entry.
|
"Almost" Good Answers: