Roger's Equations Blog

Roger's Equations

This blog is all about science and technology (with occasional math thrown in for fun). The goal of this blog is to try and pass on the sense of excitement and wonder I feel when I read about these topics. I hope you enjoy the posts.

Previous in Blog: Euler Formula   Next in Blog: Vectors and Scalars - Part II
Close
Close
Close
9 comments
Rating: Comments: Nested

Vectors and Scalars - Part I

Posted October 02, 2006 4:38 PM by Bayes

Some quantities are expressed as Vectors and others are expressed as Scalars. Since Vectors and Scalars are fundamental concepts that are used in Engineering and Physics, I thought I might spend a blog entry or two on their features. Let's start off with some informal definitions.

Scalar- A magnitude only (Energy, Temperature, Voltage, etc.)

Vector- A magnitude and a direction (Force, Current, Velocity, etc.)

Scalars and Vectors can and will interact with each other. It is useful to know each of the interactions:

Addition

Scalar + Scalar = Scalar (Always)

Scalar + Vector = Undefined

Vector + Vector = Vector (Always)

Multiplication

Scalar x Scalar = Scalar (Always)

Scalar x Vector = Vector (Always)

Vector x Vector = Scalar (Commonly called the Dot Product)

Vector x Vector = Vector (Commonly called the Cross Product)

So you can add vectors, take the dot product or cross product of vectors, or multiply vectors by a scalar. You can add and multiply scalars.

Just as scalars can be plotted on a graph, so can vectors. The most intuitive expression of vectors is in Spherical Coordinates (ρ,Φ,θ), where ρ is equal to the magnitude of the vector and Φ and θ coordinates are used to indicate its direction. Unfortunately Cartesian Coordiantes (x,y,z) aren't as convenient because the magnitude and direction aren't split up betwen x, y, and z but all mixed together.

Since this mixing in x,y,z coordinates can be a liability, it is usefull to be able to switch between x,y,z coordinate systems and ρ,Φ,θ coordinate systems. Basically:

Since much of the time we are more interested in the magnitude of the vector as opposed to its direction, we are only interested in ρ. Sometimes r is used instead of ρ. This is why many equations are written in the form similiar to the coulomb force below:

In the equation above, the r is the magnitude of the distance between the two charges q1 and q2 and is the direction, called the unit vector. All the unit vector is is the direction with a magnitude of 1. The equation is splitting the information up into magnitude and direction because force is a vector.

Another feature of vectors is they can used to form vector fields. To explain this, lets first consider a scalar field and then extend the idea to vectors.

A scalar field assigns a magnitude for every point in space. So if the coordinates are in the form of (x,y,z) then for each unique value of (x,y,z) there is an associated scalar, such as energy or temperature. Lets take the temperature of a room as the scalar we're interested in. If we take the temperature of each point in the room and write it down, we have basically written down the temperature scalar field of the room.

Now remember vectors are the same as scalars except each point would have a magnitude and direction. If we were to measure the wind velocity in a room for every point (x,y,z), we'd have to make a list that had three columns, the point in the room where we took the measurement, velocity magnitude, velocity direction. If we made this list for every point in the room, we have basically written down the Wind Velocity Vector field of the room. The image below demonstrates what a vector field looks like:

Sometimes (like in the graph above) a scalar or vector field can be described by an equation. This equation is called a function and can be used to calculate the vector or scalar, depending on whether its a vector or scalar function, for every point in space. In my next blog I will spend a little time talking about vector functions and then I will revisit an earlier blog topic, namely the gradient, curl, and divergence of a field.

Reply

Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 3804
Good Answers: 69
#1

Re: Vectors and Scalars

10/03/2006 5:31 AM

Great stuff, Roger! Will you eventually get to the big brother of vectors, i.e., tensors, as well?

__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge." -- Kahlil Gibran
Reply
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129
#4
In reply to #1

Re: Vectors and Scalars

10/03/2006 5:51 PM

Tensors are very interesting, especially for someone who likes math symmetric and neat like myself. Unfortunately they are going to fall outside the scope of these two blog entries, I'm not even getting into matrices, just vectors and scalars. I wouldn't mind reading your take on them though. General Relativity is based completely on them, right? You must have a pretty good understanding.

I'll warn you though, if you post something, I'll probably have a bunch of questions ;)

Reply
Guru
Engineering Fields - Aerospace Engineering - Retired South Africa - Member - The Rainbow-nation Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Relativity & Cosmology Popular Science - Cosmology - The Big Picture!

Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 3804
Good Answers: 69
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Vectors and Scalars (& Tensors)

10/06/2006 3:56 AM

Hi Roger, I must disappoint you; my take on tensors is pretty elementary and my eBook only has a very light 'sprinkling' of tensors. I took the engineering route of accepting what the scientists say, provided that it's well supported by evidence, and then developing it further in a more engineering-like fashion.

I was hoping you have a better take on tensors than me!

__________________
"Perplexity is the beginning of knowledge." -- Kahlil Gibran
Reply
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129
#8
In reply to #6

Re: Vectors and Scalars (& Tensors)

10/07/2006 12:15 AM

Alright, I'll consider it a request. It will be a couple entries down the line. The subject is interesting and the dot product and cross product, matrices and vectors make a lot more sense in the general context of tensors.

Roger

Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2

Re: Vectors and Scalars

10/03/2006 8:07 AM

You could change that to say that DC voltage is a scalar, but voltage is not a scalar.

Mr. G.

Reply
Power-User
United States - Member - New Member Fans of Old Computers - PDP 11 - New Member Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 381
Good Answers: 8
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Vectors and Scalars

10/03/2006 8:47 AM

In what way?

Reply
The Engineer
Engineering Fields - Engineering Physics - Physics... United States - Member - NY Popular Science - Genetics - Organic Chemistry... Popular Science - Cosmology - New Member Ingeniería en Español - Nuevo Miembro - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 5060
Good Answers: 129
#5
In reply to #2

Re: Vectors and Scalars

10/05/2006 11:14 PM

When I list Voltage, I mean the colloquial term for the Electrical Potential, which is a scalar potential as can be seen in the equation below:

E = -V where E is the Electric Field (a vector field) and V is the Electric Potential (a scalar field).

I hope that clears it up. If there is another use of the term voltage, or I'm making a mistake, please let me know and I'll make a correction.

Thanks,

Roger

Reply
Power-User
United States - Member - New Member Fans of Old Computers - PDP 11 - New Member Hobbies - HAM Radio - New Member

Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 381
Good Answers: 8
#7
In reply to #5

I think he's referring to phasors

10/06/2006 10:12 PM

I suspect that Mr. G is referring to the phasor representation of AC voltage, which is used to analyze the magnitude and phase relationships of multiphase AC circuits in phase space. However, that doesn't change the scalar nature of voltage, it's just a nice construct for analyzing its time characteristics.

Reply
Commentator
Peru - Member - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Lima Peru
Posts: 57
#9

Re: Vectors and Scalars - Part I

10/29/2006 3:58 PM

This was nice, thanks Roger

__________________
There is allways another way
Reply
Reply to Blog Entry 9 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Bayes (3); ciro (1); Jorrie (2); Steve (2)

Previous in Blog: Euler Formula   Next in Blog: Vectors and Scalars - Part II

Advertisement