Engineering360: "A federal boost for US clean energy tech"

I think their priorities are in the wrong order. I would put nuclear first, because it likely will be the best long-term energy supply. Carbon capture perhaps should be last--what happens when the world market is flooded with the captured carbon? Hydrogen may be neat, but it takes energy to make it. When I was at Argonne, it was quickly noticed that helium would leak thru vinyl bags. Hydrogen is an even smaller molecule. Sealing it will be a real problem.

Storing nuclear spent rods for hundreds or thousands of years isn't clean energy.