Close
Close
3 comments
Comments: Nested

Engineering360: "Long-duration renewable energy storage is cost-competitive"

10/17/2023 9:15 AM

Read Engineering360 article: Long-duration renewable energy storage is cost-competitive.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Wannabeabettawelda

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 7940
Good Answers: 458
#1

Re: Long-duration renewable energy storage is cost-competitive

10/17/2023 5:43 PM

Tremors? Earthquakes? Intrinsically, this process would raise and lower the earth (not Earth) and I would be surprised if there were not side effects similar to the issues where the earth in California's central valley is sinking due to the removal of water from the aquifers for irrigation.

Register to Reply
Active Contributor

Join Date: Apr 2020
Posts: 13
#2

Re: Long-duration renewable energy storage is cost-competitive

10/18/2023 8:47 AM

Sounds similar to compressed air energy storage, which has been around for awhile but doesn't seem to have caught on.

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Wannabeabettawelda

Join Date: May 2007
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Posts: 7940
Good Answers: 458
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Long-duration renewable energy storage is cost-competitive

10/18/2023 11:30 AM

The fundamental flaw with compressed air storage is the thermodynamic issues with pressurization and de-pressurization and resultant energy losses. There have been some very complicated schemes to try to use/recover the heat, but again, this concept violates the KISS principles and is impractical to implement in other than academic exercises.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

Advertisement