I am taken with the difference between good sound ideas and good sounding ideas. Just read that a new valve saved air by rapid on/off pulses that could save as much as 45% of the compressed air volume being used.
I am a doubter. It seems that the pulsed supply valve is trying to emulate a alternating electrical voltage where 120 VAC has a power factor reduction below the energy produced by 120 VDC.
Starting with 120 PSIG with compressed air and chopping the flow with on/off pulses would indeed reduce the pressure during flow and "save" compressed air energy. In many or most cases a pneumatic regulator could be used to drop the supply pressure lower also "saving" compressed air.
The most effective saving might be to adjust the compressor pressure down rather than work to charge it to a higher pressure and then regulate the pressure down. That is like making toast by the burn it and scrape it method. Adjusting the compressor would save energy of compression and flowing at a lower pressure as well.
An adjustable orifice responding to a pressure transducer might help if the air flow were variable.
The electrical energy, mechanical wear, and delta-P (pressure drop) across the the pulsating valve, higher supply pressure and limited ability to adjust for flow variations all seem like negatives to me.
Possibly I am just over taken with the NIH (Not Invented Here) syndrome. My name is Thomas and yes I am doubting.
Good Answers:
"Almost" Good Answers: