Previous in Forum: Drought prediction   Next in Forum: Tay Bridge Disaster
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
The Feature Creep

Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 990

Leaning Tower of Sioux Falls

12/05/2005 9:29 AM

Over the weekend the demolition of the 202 foot tall Zip Tower in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, didn't go as planned. The explosive charges didn't level the structure as intended. Instead, the abandoned feed mill settled into it's foundation after losing the first few floors. It is now leaning precariously, and has become a make-shift tourist site. Check out the video of the failed demolition.

__________________
"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet." -William Gibson
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Friend of CR4

Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1776
Good Answers: 35
#1

That's not an engineering failure

12/05/2005 9:38 AM

It's a demoltion failure! I'd say it's an engineering success!

__________________
Off to take on other challenges. Good luck everybody! See you around the Interwebs.
Register to Reply
Power-User
United Kingdom - Member - New Member Hobbies - Model Rocketry - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In my house, at the loom.
Posts: 197
Good Answers: 3
#2

Is the explosives expert really an expert?

12/05/2005 1:13 PM

I have no explosives training, nor do I work with concrete, but this quote from the explosives teasm leader just doesn't seem correct:

"He said the tower didn't fall because the concrete on the west side did not remain stiff. Instead of cutting a wedge out of the east side, the explosion collapsed both sides as well as the basement foundation, leaving the building stuck like a cork in a bottle."

If the concrete didn't remain stiff wouldn't the whole thing have cracked and collapsed when it fell into the hole?

__________________
The yoke a man creates for himself by wrong-doing will breed hate in the kindliest nature . . .
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3
In reply to #2

Re:Is the explosives expert really an expert?

12/06/2005 11:21 AM

Apparently, the shock of the initial explosion softened or "fluidized" the foundation on both sides. The original intent was to cut the supports out of one side only. The west side was to remain rigid and support the west half of the building as it fell to the east. This should have sent the building tumbling to one side. Since both sides collapsed at virtually the same time the building fell straight down and did not topple to the east. In essence it was jammed into the basement like a cork in a bottle!

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); Chris Leonard (1); Silas Marner (1)

Previous in Forum: Drought prediction   Next in Forum: Tay Bridge Disaster

Advertisement