Previous in Forum: Gaylord rotator/dumper   Next in Forum: Shrinking Machine Found!!
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6

Accredited vs. Non Accredited

04/20/2005 12:30 PM

In today's Internet environment, it seems that every Web site has an advert on education that offers degrees based on experience. Even GlobalSpec is part of this trend with Kennedy-Western University. This has caused me to wonder how much emphasis is being placed on the ABET/AEC curriculum now that there are states that allow PE licensure without such a degree. Is the "traditional" educational atmosphere still worth it when anyone with a third of a brain and $7K to burn can obtain a degree? I know that the basis of education is a starting point and that practicing our respective fields is where true knowledge is gained; but would you, as a normal person, go through the 3-1/2 years of traditional education or take one year (in most cases, less) and be done with it? Just a thought from a rambling mind.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Anonymous Poster
#1

Ther are a number of reasons why I

04/20/2005 3:15 PM

would go for the full degree over the "diploma mill". Less than a year ago there was a big hulaballo about government employees who had received such degrees. Many were terminated or forced to stay in their positions. One's degree should not prevent you from moving forward. While I have no specific knowledge of the quality of education received, from what i understand it is not comparable to a full education - many coreners cut simply to get a piece of paper. Finally, and slightly off-topic, in my youth, I paid $20 to become a Chaplainn in a church advertised at the back of Rolling Stone magazine. While I could legally marry folks and perform last rights, would I be equally capable of performing the important tasks of comforting parishioners and finding important issues to cannonical questions as someone from a real seminary or divinity shcool. Definitely not.

Register to Reply
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33
#2

It Depends

04/20/2005 3:47 PM

My answer to stones' question is "It depends." If you're already doing the work of an engineer, or if you simply want a piece of paper that tells the world or a questioning boss what you already know (e.g., "I am a skilled engineer"), then why not take the quickest route? But if you're starting from scratch with little technical knowledge, then look carefully at those on-line programs. Most of the "success stories" I've read profile people who are already working in their chosen field. So how do graduates without engineering work experience fare? Maybe that's the million dollar question to ask on-line recruiters (and I welcome any who are reading this to jump in). On-line programs that are advertised as being "for busy professionals" are, I think, telling an oblique truth about themselves. They work best for those who already know most of what they need to know, but simply need to provide proof. This is, after all, an age of specialization and certification.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#3

Re: Accredited vs. Non Accredited

10/22/2007 1:49 PM

Gaining a degree from a diploma mill such as Kennedy Western University a/k/a Warren National University is never the answer. They were investigated by the Senate and it was found that they will waive a large part of your "degree" and that entire courses consisted of one open book exam.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments

Previous in Forum: Gaylord rotator/dumper   Next in Forum: Shrinking Machine Found!!

Advertisement