Previous in Forum: Strain At Break & Nominal Strain Break   Next in Forum: Major Certification of a Choke Manifold
Close
Close
Close
3 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Associate
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member South Africa - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 52

Atomizing vs Granulation

10/29/2007 5:23 AM

Hi All

As a process engineer (Metallurgical) I have been asked if it is possible to granulate molten metal to get particle sizes smaller than 500 micron (0.5mm). My answer was that it sure is possible if you have high enough water pressure and flow rate in the granulator.

However, in order to test this I would like to build a small granulation unit and an atomizing unit. I went on the internet and got quotes for an atomizer, but at US$1.5 million, it is a bit steep for my budget. Does anyone have experience in the design of said equipment?

Here are my thoughts:

Granulator: To granulate Copper, 2T per hour, I will use 100 liter water per hour at 10 Bar pressure. The "striking pad" is in the middle of the stream (water sprayed through a slit in a box to create a ribbon 3mm thick, 200mm wide), and running down a chute 3.6m long.

Atomiser: To atomise 2T/h Copper, I will use 100 liter water per hour at 50 Bar pressure. The "striking pad" is in the middle of a circle of jets. The jets are produced with nozzles (20 of them), directed 30 degrees downward and inward, all spraying exactly in the same spot. The atomised metal will then fall down a chamber and be caught in a removable cone. (I have not made any drawings of this yet.

Any comments will be appreciated.

TC

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru

Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: 30°30'N, 97°45'W, Elv: 597 ft.
Posts: 2410
Good Answers: 10
#1

Re: Atomizing vs Granulation

10/29/2007 3:41 PM

A number of the elements that you are describing are quite similar to those used in water jetting (I am unfamiliar with your process but quite familiar with water jetting). Perhaps your ideas and spares from a jet mfg co would work well together. Definitely less than $1.5 mil U.S.!

Keep us posted.

cr3

__________________
I never apologize. I'm sorry that's just the way I am.
Register to Reply
Power-User
Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 110
Good Answers: 3
#2

Re: Atomizing vs Granulation

10/30/2007 9:33 AM

Why not just spray molten copper through an atomizer?

__________________
ONE TEST IS WORTH A THOUSAND EXPERT OPINIONS
Register to Reply
Associate
Engineering Fields - Systems Engineering - New Member South Africa - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2007
Location: South Africa
Posts: 52
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Atomizing vs Granulation

10/31/2007 5:28 AM

Thanks erssk, why did I not think of it?

There is only one reason! $$$$$$$ As I mentioned the quote I got for an atomiser is US$1.5Mil. So I have to make it work on my own.

T

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 3 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

erssk (1); T4T (1); TexasCharley (1)

Previous in Forum: Strain At Break & Nominal Strain Break   Next in Forum: Major Certification of a Choke Manifold

Advertisement