Previous in Forum: About SWG   Next in Forum: Champ: The Legend of Lake Champlain
Close
Close
Close
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
United States - Member - New Member Technical Fields - Technical Writing - New Member Popular Science - Weaponology - Organizer Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Nuclear Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2969
Good Answers: 33

U.S. Military Tries to Trim Energy Costs

03/10/2006 11:30 AM

The U.S. military is speeding up its efforts to save energy and develop new sources of power. During the last budget year, the Pentagon's fuel bill hit $7.4 billion, a jump of more than $2.7 billion from fiscal 2004. All military bases and facilities have been ordered to cut energy use by 2% per year and pursue alternative energy sources, such as solar and wind. The Air Force, which burns more fuel than the rest of the military combined, is speeding up programs to fit more fuel-efficient engines on older aircraft such as the B-52 bomber and C-5 transport.

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Commentator

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Central Canada
Posts: 84
Good Answers: 2
#1

Fuel Savings (Really) ????

03/11/2006 10:28 AM

Does the overall costs of changing the engines per aircraft warrent the change, taking ALL costs into concideration, and the life span of the air-frame vs the fuel savings. Although they might be able to reduce fuel consumption slightly, I really don't think they can reduce it that much to make changing the engines cost effective, even over the long haul. Just another way of making the engine building companies RICHER ,under the pretence of fuel savings.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply

Previous in Forum: About SWG   Next in Forum: Champ: The Legend of Lake Champlain

Advertisement