Technical considerations on pulse width stability in commercial picosecond laser systems

This sounds more like an advertisement for new business. This is an engineering blog. If you have engineering terms you need explained, we can help.

As far as what you posted, an acceptable range of 500 to 750 seems like a very wide tolerance of ±20%. I suspect that will be fine for removing a tattoo. It certainly will not be an accurate timing reference for any pulse-width measurement.

I wouldn’t use pulse energy alone to judge pulse width. The energy could stay stable while the pulse duration changes. Are you looking for continuous monitoring during operation or a way to verify pulse width during bench testing?

You asked “Are you looking for continuous monitoring during operation or a way to verify pulse width during bench testing?”

Nah, he isn’t looking for any advice at all. I firmly believe that redfred nailed it within his comment #1, our new member is trying to drum up some business.

This type of plea in a spam post is intended to provoke a positive interaction (from the target forum) with the spammer in the hope that more of the product features can be described when he (the OP) responds.