Previous in Forum: Replacing an Electric Motor - What of hp?   Next in Forum: Predicting Mechanical Component Reliability
Close
Close
Close
9 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4

Steam Flow Measurement in Vertical Downflow #400

06/28/2006 1:48 PM

I have a strange problem measuring down flow (vertical pipe) steam off a boiler.
Flow nozzle in the 20" line with a Rosemount 3095MV differential pressure transmitter. ¾" impulse lines tap into the main steam line before and after the DP nozzle. These lines have condensate pots, and then continue down 20' to the DP transmitter.
Two boilers come together in a Y after each is measured independently.
One boiler online, other off, but with steam pressure #400 up to the stop/check valve at the steam drum. The high pressure impulse line is 16" between the condensate pot and the main steam line. This line is always around 160degf 16" below the condensate pot, the low pressure impulse line condensate pot is always cool. The offline boiler will show different steady flows even though there is no steam passt-hrough on the flow nozzle. This is probably from a difference in hydrostatic head between the hot pot and the cold pot; however, the xmitter is accurate when the boiler is on.

Any help? How do we keep the hot pot cool and full of condensate even with no flow but with full steam pressure?
thanks- JP

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: boilers flow nozzle steam flow
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Detroit Downriver
Posts: 119
#1

Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 8:01 AM

A hot condensate pot is indication of a leak somewhere. If the impulse line is deadheaded at the instrument, and there are no leaks back to the condensate pot, and no leak at the condensate pot, it will do its job and collect condensate that will equalize to ambient temperature. With no leaks, the surface area of condensate to HP steam is the only source of heat transfer. That should be very small.

During an outage, block in the system at the header and pressure check your pots and lines to find the source. Or, alternatively, you can block in the impulse lines below the pots and wait to see if the pot cools. If it does, then replace the impulse line.

__________________
The legacy of the digital age is that of segregation through differing formats. - HerbVic
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4
#2
In reply to #1

Re:Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 8:49 AM

Thanks for the reply. I have run my hand over the entire impulse line to check for leaks, and found none. These impulse lines were just replaced as well.
Another odd aspect is BOTH boilers have the same flow station before they come together in a Y, and both exhibit the same exact symptoms: Hi side impulse line (w/ condensate pot) is hot about a foot past the condensate pot, low side is cool. I have pictures of the setup I can send to anyone if they like, to get a better idea of the installation. Very odd.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 662
Good Answers: 49
#3
In reply to #2

Re:Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 9:12 AM

Suggest that you repipe the impul;se lines so that both condensate pots are below the DeltaP meter, then up to the meter. The small amount of heat transfer at condensate-to-steam interface will still create more cndensate, that will "spill" down the HP line to the meter, warming the pipe and causing some static head on the meter. With the loops below the meter, this phenomenon will be the same on both sides of the meter.

__________________
NO MATTER HOW WELL YOU HAVE DONE SO FAR, ALWAYS TRY TO BE BETTER TOMORROW.
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Detroit Downriver
Posts: 119
#4
In reply to #2

Re:Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 10:32 AM

That sounds as though there is an equalizer valve leakage. Are the impulse lines connected through a manifold block or through a piping valve arrangement?

__________________
The legacy of the digital age is that of segregation through differing formats. - HerbVic
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4
#5
In reply to #4

Re:Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 10:45 AM

The impulse lines are connected to a block manifold which is attached to the Rosemount 3095MV transmitter. The issue with false signal is sometimes the transmitter will read zero as it should, but other times it read a steady value above zero; often it is 100 kpph out of 700 kpph full scale. I believe this is due to a difference in condensate levels in the impulse legs, and this scenario is inconsistent, it will not always read the same error. if we open the equalizing valve, it will read zero and stay there for some time, not sure how long. However the error will always return for both boilers when no flow is passing though the measuring station, so the condensate levels will not remain consistent I think. Thanks!

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Detroit Downriver
Posts: 119
#6
In reply to #5

Re:Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 11:24 AM

When you can, try closing the high side block valve on the equalizer manifold for a couple of hours to see if that has an effect on the temperature of the condensate pot.

If that doesn't provide a clue, partially close the block valve at the steam header to provide a dampening effect on exchange between the seal-pot and the header. You may be dealing with a venturi effect drawing your condensate back into the header.

__________________
The legacy of the digital age is that of segregation through differing formats. - HerbVic
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Detroit Downriver
Posts: 119
#7
In reply to #5

Re:Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 11:49 AM

When you open the equalizer valve and it reads zero, do you have one of the impulse lines blocked in? If you are getting zero with either side blocked in and the equalizer open, that is correct. If it reads zero with both sides open and the equalizer open, that's a calibration issue.

Check the Rosemount 3095MV book for set up details, if you are uncertain. Also, the Rosemount customer service rep will be happy to help you troubleshoot the problem.

Good luck!

__________________
The legacy of the digital age is that of segregation through differing formats. - HerbVic
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4
#8
In reply to #7

Re:Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 12:32 PM

Thanks for The help. I am a little confused though. If there is no real DP in the process line, then if I have both impulse legs open to the process and I open the equalizing valve, I should see a zero, correct? If I keep one of the impulse lines sealed, and I open the equalizing valve, the condensate level might not equalize in both legs. If one leg is sealed, the condensate might be kept higher than the open leg due to no air available to displace the condensate. (Like holding soda in a straw by keeping one end in your mouth, as you remove the straw from the glass of soda). I would think I want all block valves open… Thanks-

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Detroit Downriver
Posts: 119
#9
In reply to #8

Re:Steam Flow Measurement

06/29/2006 12:46 PM

You are correct, insofar as equalizing the condensate line levels. However, if you have all valves open, you create an open path from the high side to the low side of the orifice. Any DP across the orifice will push your condendate back into the steam header. The proper way to equalize the condensate levels in both lines is to let physics take its course. In other words, the condensate is self equalizing over delta Temp of the condensate pot.

__________________
The legacy of the digital age is that of segregation through differing formats. - HerbVic
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 9 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

energygod (1); HerbVic (5); JP_IC (3)

Previous in Forum: Replacing an Electric Motor - What of hp?   Next in Forum: Predicting Mechanical Component Reliability

Advertisement