Previous in Forum: Deep Drawing Aluminised steel.   Next in Forum: manufacturing basics
Close
Close
Close
4 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3

ES Industry Time Standards

07/10/2008 7:20 AM

Let me introduce my self as an Industrial Engineer, recently associated with an EMS company in India.

We have some fully automatic Pick & Place machines, for placing the Surface Mount components of the PCB assembly. We are getting the Cycle Time required for the cards from some reports generated on the basis of the program. Is there anything wrong in setting the Time Standards on the basis of the Cycle Time indicated by the machine program? Do I need to give any allowance for minor stoppages for component reel changes or certain small downtimes due to problems with stick feeder etc. which are quite unpredictable with respect to the frequency of the same? I need to know the EMS industry practice.

Also, I would like to know whether there is any EMS industry accepted time standards for the manual forming & stuffing of through hole components

Register to Reply
Pathfinder Tags: Time Standards
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Guru
Engineering Fields - Manufacturing Engineering - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member United States - Member - New Member Hobbies - Hunting - New Member

Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC USA
Posts: 791
Good Answers: 17
#1

Re: ES Industry Time Standards

07/10/2008 8:30 AM

Taking the machine cycle time is acceptable, to add in the odd occurrence, you need to manually time the 'minor stoppages' and do basically a guess as to how often it occurs. Take the stoppages time and divide that by the number of parts you expect to get between occurrences and add that back into the machine cycle time.

That should work just fine. You may need to adjust that over time as you get better data as to the number of stoppages you get.

__________________
Be careful of what you wish for .....
Register to Reply
2
Guru
Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2181
Good Answers: 255
#2

Re: ES Industry Time Standards

07/10/2008 9:09 AM

The time prediction from the HLC (Host Line Computer) is a good start, but will never be achieved in reality.

You need to add an allowance for stoppages plus an allowance for transit time for the last panel through the machines plus missed picks from the component feeders within the placement cycle plus time for machine "nozzle" changes if those are automatic.

The HLC will probably also assume the feeders are placed in "optimum" position. Any deviation from that layout for the feeders will mean more machine movement (and thus a longer cycle time) The HLC will probably also assume "fast" placement speed for all components, but some need to be moved and placed slower and so will compromise the total machine speed.

We target 85% OEE for an SMT line with four machines in line including process changeover.

Sometimes, for low density boards, the printer or the reflow oven become the bottleneck. Be careful of those limitations if they are appropriae to your line.

__________________
Just an Engineer from the land down under.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 2)
Participant

Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 3
#3
In reply to #2

ES Industry Time Standards

07/11/2008 12:53 AM

Thanks for your feedback. I hope you are also from the EMS industry, on going thru' your reply.

I appreciate your comment that the time prediction from HLC is good start and understand that it may not be achieved in reality. But the reasons for not achieving the same, from my viewpoint, is the inefficiencies of perhaps the Management or the Operators. My opinion is that the Time Standard for the same should be in accordance with the HLC. But to start with, we may set the target by including certain allowances and cutting it down on yearly basis. The responsibility for improving the inefficiencies should be with the Process Engineer.

Regarding your remarks in para 3, what I have understood from the Service Engineer of the machine manufacturer (and is widely true with various types of fully automatic machines in various industries) is that deviation from the machine suggested feeder position is accounted in the cycle time shown & it will correspond to the actual placement of feeders in our machines. And the placement speed is also determined by the machine from factors like component size etc.

Your feedback to my opinion is invited.....

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dominican Republic
Posts: 278
Good Answers: 10
#4

Re: ES Industry Time Standards

07/11/2008 7:42 AM

To start with, Take your set up time and divide it over you lot size. Then take yourmachine standard times and multiply by 0.85 Most operators are your slow downs and nobody works at 100%. 85% will leave you enough time for jams, misfeeds and operator error.

I have not found any standard times for hand insertion but i quote based on a couple of things:

Prep the kit

Form the part

pick up & orientate the part

Insert & clench

Avg Axial part 15 sec

Avg Radial part 18-20 sec.

You can figure this in your head, Imagine the part, pick it up and imagine inserting it 1-2 leads at a time, turning board uver and clinching.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 4 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

DGCYS (1); jaisonvalooran (1); Just an Engineer (1); Labyguy (1)

Previous in Forum: Deep Drawing Aluminised steel.   Next in Forum: manufacturing basics

Advertisement