Previous in Forum: Maintenance Equipment Frequency   Next in Forum: Tips for Fiberglass Cryogenic Tank Design
Close
Close
Close
13 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9

Bending Moments

09/29/2008 11:50 AM

I have a trailer which has a fixed load of 3900 lbs mounted such that much of the weight is behind the axle. The axel is 38" from the rear end and 112" from the hitch. There is only 100 lbs of weight on the hitch. As I can not move the load, I would like to move the axle back to get 700 lbs on the hitch. (600 additional) How far should the axle be back from the hitch?

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.
Guru
Hobbies - Fishing - Old Salt Hobbies - CNC - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - New Member

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Rosedale, Maryland USA
Posts: 5197
Good Answers: 266
#1

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 12:57 PM

That depends on how the weight is distributed on the trailer. Most loads on trailers are not so there is no set formula to calculate the distance you would have to move the axle. We would need a better idea of what the load is, its dimension and the location on the trailer.

__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving in a pretty, pristine body but rather to come sliding in sideways, all used up and exclaiming, "Wow, what a ride!"
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
#2
In reply to #1

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 1:25 PM

Hi

Thanks but the trailer and the fixed load are one intragal unit. The load can not be moved. we can only move the axle further back. The total weight of the is 4000 lbs and it only tales 100 lb force to lift the tongue with the present axle configuration, (ie) the axle is very close to the center of gravity. By moving the axle back will transfer weight to the tongue. The question is how far to move it to transfer an additional 500 - 600 lbs.

Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Omaha
Posts: 1
#3

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 2:45 PM

moments must be equal at balance pt, so (assuming load is equally distributed):

112" x 100# =11200 in-lb

3900# / 11200 in-lb = 2.87" fwd of axle (cg of load)

You want 600# on the tongue, and need to know how far to move axle (d),

solve for d:

600# x (112" - d) = 3900# x (2.87" + d)

112 - d = 18.655 + 18.655d

112 = 18.655 + 19.655d

d = 4.75"

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1212
Good Answers: 74
#4
In reply to #3

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 5:20 PM

Let d = distance to move axle back.

Let b = distance from axle to c.g. of load now

Let Rh = Reaction at hitch

At present, Rh = 3900*b/112 = 100#, so b=100*112/3900 = 2.87".

After the move, Rh = 3900(b + d)/(112 + d) = 700#

Solving this equation, d = 21" so distance from hitch to axle = 112" + 21" = 133".

Check Rh = 3900(2.87 + 21)/133 = 699.95# (close enough to 700#).

Conclusion: move the axle 21" back (or 133" from hitch).

__________________
Bruce
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 6:35 PM

Thanks very much for your help.

Mike Sidon

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#7
In reply to #5

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 6:36 PM

So - I've gotta ask ...........

Which dimension are you going with? The 4.75" or 21"? Quite a discrepancy there.

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1212
Good Answers: 74
#6
In reply to #4

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 6:36 PM

There is another way to solve the problem without calculating b. Since Rh = 100#, for equilibrium, the other reaction, say Raxle = 3900 - 100 = 3800#. We want to move the axle so that Rh is increased by 600#, i.e. 3800d/(112 + d) = 600. Solving, we again find d = 21".

__________________
Bruce
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
#8
In reply to #4

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 7:12 PM

Hi Bruce

I think that the 4.75 result is flawed in the math and also possibly the formula. Both of you however came up with the same initial value for CG. In the formula he took the target weight x 112-d; I think you are correct in taking the weight desired + d as the distance to the axle needs to be increased to shift more weight to the tongue. Do you agree?

Unfortunately I may run out of frame and only be able to move the axle about 6" so using the formula you provided that would give me a total of 286 lbs of tongue weight, correct? This will help somewhat (I have been blowing tires and need to do something to reduce the load on them.)

Thanks again for your help.

Mike

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1212
Good Answers: 74
#9
In reply to #8

Re: Bending moments

09/29/2008 7:41 PM

Hi Mark,

I agree that a move of 6" will reduce the tire load by about 190#. It may not be enough, but I guess every little bit helps. If you could extend the frame another foot or so, it would help, but I gather that is not practical.

Best of luck.

__________________
Bruce
Register to Reply
Commentator

Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rhode Island, USA
Posts: 56
Good Answers: 5
#10

Re: Bending Moments

09/29/2008 8:05 PM

I don't think that you can solve this analytically without knowing the weight distribution of the load behind the axle. I'd jack the trailer up and put in jack stands a few inches behind the axle centerpoint and see how much load is shifted, and make adjustments as needed. A couple of tries should get you where you need to be.

It may not be a very elegant mathmatical approach, but it will get you the answer.

Dave

Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1212
Good Answers: 74
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Bending Moments

09/29/2008 8:23 PM

If the reaction at the hitch is known to be 100# and the total weight of trailer is known to be 3900#, and the distance from hitch to axle is known, then the weight distribution doesn't matter because the location of the center of gravity of all of those weights is known precisely. Place your trust in engineering statics. They will not fail you.

__________________
Bruce
Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: May 2007
Location: 39°10' N 91°52' W
Posts: 237
Good Answers: 15
#12

Re: Bending Moments

09/30/2008 7:17 AM

Aside from the constant threat of tire blow-out, how does the trailer "pull" now?

With regards to your tires, are you using P(passenger) type tires? If so, you would be well advised to go to a LT(light truck) tire. The internal construction of the tires is different, and is designed for load rather than smoothness of ride. 1900 lb per tire is overloaded on a tire designed for at most 1500 lb in the case of P type tires. LT tires have different load ratings as in "load range C" or "load range D", each designed to carry a different range of load, depending on if they are "single" or "dual".

The point I am trying to make is that if the trailer pulls fine as is, you should look at the tires themselves as the culprit for the blowout problem. Think Ford Explorer tire blowout problems of a few years past. Those were equipped with P type tires that were overloaded/under inflated to improve the ride of the vehicle. Buyers that spec'd LT tires when they bought the truck didn't have the blowout problems.

__________________
If you don't have time to do it right the first time, when are you going to have time to do it over?
Register to Reply
Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 9
#13
In reply to #12

Re: Bending Moments

09/30/2008 4:55 PM

Charlie

Thanks for the response, however, tires are 14 ply, load range G, rated for over 3000 lbs each.

Mike

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 13 comments
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); ba/ael (4); Big Lark (1); charlie_r (1); DaveR (1); M Sidon (4); ozzb (1)

Previous in Forum: Maintenance Equipment Frequency   Next in Forum: Tips for Fiberglass Cryogenic Tank Design

Advertisement