This is somewhere between a question and a discussion, but it popped into my head as a result of thinking about several other threads on here.
Suppose you had a video showing a plain blue screen in the front of an ordinary room. Someone out of view below the frame throws a red ball straight up. The ball goes almost to the top of the frame and then falls straight back down. Now this is one of those super fast videos, 1000 frames per second, and you can start, stop, and reverse at will.
The question/discussion is this: Could someone use that video to show (convincingly?) that perpetual motion machines of the second kind are impossible? If so, what line of argument would work?
__________________
"Well, I've wrestled with reality for 35 years, Doctor, and I'm happy to state I finally won out over it." Elwood P. Dowd