Previous in Forum: areator   Next in Forum: Feeding oil from OD to shaft centre
Close
Close
Close
9 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Active Contributor
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 14

API 650 One foot Method

12/07/2008 8:23 AM

Hi Friends,

Can we design carbon steel storage tank size 72m diameter x 15 height using API 650 One foot method instead of variable point method?

Thanks

Prashant

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 130
Good Answers: 17
#1

Re: API 650 One foot Method

12/07/2008 3:17 PM

No - according to API 650 3.6.3.1 - the one foot method may not be used on tanks over 60m in diameter.

Accordingly - you must make sure, when designing with the variable point method that you meet the 3.6.4.1 criteria of

L/H ≤ 1000/6

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#2
In reply to #1

Re: API 650 One foot Method

12/08/2008 5:06 AM

Just out of curiosity what is a one 'foot method'?

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 130
Good Answers: 17
#5
In reply to #2

Re: API 650 One foot Method

12/08/2008 11:55 AM

It's the method of calculating shell thickness at design points 1 foot above the bottom of each shell course. The variable-design-point method gives shell thicknesses at design points that result in the calculated stresses being relatively close to the actual circumferential shell stresses.

Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#9
In reply to #5

Re: API 650 One foot Method

06/16/2010 9:47 AM

Actually why this method is called 1ft method. I know this methid gives thickness above 1ft height of the shell course. But my question is why 1ft ?? why not else...

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Active Contributor
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 14
#3
In reply to #1

Re: API 650 One foot Method

12/08/2008 8:27 AM

what if L/H ≥ 1000/6.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 130
Good Answers: 17
#4
In reply to #3

Re: API 650 One foot Method

12/08/2008 11:53 AM

That's a big tank.

If you can't adjust the diameter/thickness to height criteria - build two tanks.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 130
Good Answers: 17
#6
In reply to #4

Re: API 650 One foot Method

12/08/2008 12:48 PM

Actually - thinking a little more ..................

(whoops it is actually 5.6.4.1 in the 11th Ed of API 650 - I originally looked at an older addition)

That is not that big of a tank - I don't see that you should have a problem, without knowing your design conditions and running the numbers - just a quick look at Table K-1 in Appendix K reveals that you should be fine.

Register to Reply
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 130
Good Answers: 17
#7
In reply to #6

Re: API 650 One foot Method

12/08/2008 12:56 PM

Digging even more - according to 5.6.5:

For tanks where L/H is greater than 1000/6 (2 in US customary units), the selection of shell thicknesses shall be based on an elastic analysis that shows the calculated shell stresses to be below the allowable stresses given in Table 5.2. The boundary conditions for the analysis shall assume a fully plastic moment caused by yielding of the plate beneath the shall and zero radial growth.

(Please don't ask me how to perform this analysis - I have never done it)

Register to Reply
Active Contributor
Engineering Fields - Mechanical Engineering - New Member

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 14
#8
In reply to #7

Re: API 650 One foot Method

12/13/2008 11:53 PM

Thank you all for your reply.

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 9 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); Guest. (5); jprashant31 (2)

Previous in Forum: areator   Next in Forum: Feeding oil from OD to shaft centre

Advertisement