Previous in Forum: Resistive Load 10W - 20W and Sine Wave @ 0.5MHz >> 2MHz   Next in Forum: Star / Delta Motor Starter
Close
Close
Close
5 comments
Participant

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2

Permanent Magnet Motors

01/08/2009 5:17 AM

Induction motors vs permanent magnet motors, cost vs efficiency!

Is it justifiable to replace currently installed induction motors with permanent magnet motors, bearing in mind that PM motors are more expensive yet they are more efficient? What site requirements would change upon this replacement, and what starting methods would now need to be implemented?

Thanks Alastair

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".
Power-User

Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 346
Good Answers: 6
#1

Re: Permanent Magnet Motors

01/08/2009 8:15 AM

mullhound; a full wave 1 or 3 phase bridge, of suitable voltage to match motor & line voltage, maybe change the overload settings, or buy a D.C. motor controller. perry

Register to Reply
4
Commentator

Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 64
Good Answers: 3
#2

Re: Permanent Magnet Motors

01/08/2009 12:06 PM

Alastair:

I am assuming that we are discussing existing three phase motors at 1 Hp or larger running off of the line, i.e., not currently variable speed.

It is extremely unlikely that you could achieve a life cycle cost reduction using permanent magnet motors to replace an existing induction motor in any real world situation. If you do a net present value calculation taking into account all factors, the installation cost will not be repaid at typical discount rates used by corporations (i.e., The cost of capital or opportunity cost is 10% to 20% for most companies, which means that energy savings each year has to be 10 to 20% of total installed cost, parts plus labor.)

The currently installed induction motor is extremely reliable and easily and cheaply repaired.

A permanent magnet AC motor is a synchronous machine, which means that it has to have a means of starting it. A pure synchronous motor will not start across the line. You must either use a variable speed drive to start off at low frequency and then increase to running speed, or you must have auxiliary induction windings on the rotor to spin up the motor until it is close enough to synchronous speed to lock in. Obviously, if you use a variable speed drive for starting you have pushed the cost up quite a bit!

Please do an analysis using the following:

* Starting torque required, PM 3 phase motor vs. induction motor

* Peak torque required comparison

* Total installed cost, parts plus labor plus overhead

* Difference in efficiency times the cost of electricity times the size of the motor times the number of hours opperated per year to calculate the energy savings

* Do a net present value calculation using the discount rate/cost of capital used by your company for making investment decisions.

An additional angle for justification is whether the motor needs to run at full speed all fo the time or not. For example, if you can put in a PM motor and a variable speed controller and for much of the time operate at only 50% speed, then there are additional possibilities for total system energy savings that can help defray the intitial capital cost.

Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 4)
Guru
Canada - Member - Specialized in power electronics

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Montreal, Canada.
Posts: 1369
Good Answers: 80
#3
In reply to #2

Re: Permanent Magnet Motors

01/09/2009 9:58 AM

Very good answer edykes!

Unless you get a large energy saving from variable speed, don't change them.

Also consider in the cost of variable speed a reduction in reliability and the possible problems caused by harmonics. You will also need training for the maintenance guys and the eventual service call from a drive expert.

But if your process can be optimized by using variable speed (permanent magnet motors, or induction), it might be worth the trouble. It rarely is for only the motor losses.

__________________
Experienced is earned, common sense is taught, both are rare essentials of life.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4484
Good Answers: 245
#4

Re: Permanent Magnet Motors

01/09/2009 10:44 AM

I think it almost impossible to say on a general basis. The difference in efficiency varies with the size of the motor and precise details of construction. Without really looking closely at the specific numbers, I'd say it would be very hard to justify a conversion from a largish induction motor (perhaps 50 hp and up), simply because high efficiency induction motors are already very efficient (and large PM motors are relatively hard to find).

In an application in which an induction motor can be started with w/ a simple contactor and runs at relatively high load all the time, I think it would be very hard to cost-justify a conversion. On the other hand, although the industrial trend has been toward VFD drives and induction motors (and away from variable speed DC drives, when variable speed is required) in medium sized motors, there will always be smaller PMAC and BLDC motors in use for both efficiency and control reasons.

When you consider the fundamental differences in the shape of the torque and efficiency curves for PM and induction motors, recommending one over the other becomes even more difficult without actually doing the math. Throw in the variable of an existing installation of a motor which is functioning well, vs ripping that out and going through a new installation, and it becomes even more difficult to generalize.

In my field, the electric vehicle world, there are examples of both induction motors (the Tesla, the GM EV1) and PM motors (most hybrids) and a good case can be made for either alternative (and, in fact, a reasonably good case can be made even for older tech series DC motors, brushes and all). So even when starting with a clean sheet, motor selection can be a complicated process, and that process is further complicated when replacing one motor with another. A justification for an induction motor in an electric vehicle often cited is that one can eliminate a multi-speed gearbox, but this is not really the case in practice, unless one is willing to sacrifice performance. The Tesla is a good example of this, in which an overriding design goal is very high performance, but the car can "only" do 120 mph, which is about 30 mph slower than current fast econocars (like the Subaru WRX). Gear the Tesla for the top speed of comparably expensive sports cars (180 mph or so) and the acceleration is no longer competitive. The torque characteristic of a PM motor is such that eliminating a gearbox is really pretty much out of the question if you want to achieve good low speed grade climbing, good top speed, and good acceleration.

I think the short answer is that each potential motor replacement must be evaluated on the basis of efficiency (though the entire installed operating range of the motor) replacement costs, the cost of money, the cost of energy, the energy policy of the corporation (to what extent does the company want to spend money to be green), recyclability of the new and old motors, etc. You might find that if your plant has a large number of small motors (3hp and less, maybe) then perhaps the conversion would make sense... maybe... and even then, only if the motors were nearing the point at which they might need to be replaced or refurbished.

Re site and starting requirements: typically there is no fundamental difference in site requirements -- all sorts of motors and drives exist side by side in industrial settings, with the vast majority of motors being fed (in the US) by 480 VAC, which is then converted as required to fit the motor and its operating mode. Starting, operating speeds, etc. depend upon specific motor applications. (Very large motors, such as those controlled from switch gear rooms in which the operating voltages are in the thousands are unlikely to become permanent magnet types.)

__________________
There is more to life than just eating mice.
Register to Reply
Participant

Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2
#5
In reply to #4

Re: Permanent Magnet Motors

01/12/2009 1:02 AM

Thanks guys appreciate your responses, it has given me much insite into the matter.

To clarify my problem more specifically, there are a large number of small 'ish induction motors(below 90KW) that i am looking to replace. At the present time when one of these motors fails it is cheaper to replace the whole motor than to repair it, so this is where my interest in PM motors came in!!

So a study of the application and all round costs of the replacement needs to considered, so will get involved in this research.

Thanks again

Alastair

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 5 comments
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Comments rated to be Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive ratings to make them "good answers".
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Blink (1); edykes (1); marcot (1); Mullhound (1); perry (1)

Previous in Forum: Resistive Load 10W - 20W and Sine Wave @ 0.5MHz >> 2MHz   Next in Forum: Star / Delta Motor Starter
You might be interested in: Stepper Motors, DC Motors, Linear Motors

Advertisement