Anti-gravity field generator

Do the same laws of physics hold true for the same experiments held south of the equator?

They hold wherever there are cats and buttered toast.

The anti-gravity cam from the space.

The problem is to made connections with the space.

From the space cam energy at low cost.

"The anti-gravity cam from the space."

What kind of space? Office space, maybe? The one next to mine is empty - its occupant was promoted last week and immediately rose to his level of incompetence.

.

"The problem is to made connections with the space."

I suspect he has connections.

.

"From the space cam energy at low cost."

Energy? What energy? I didn't see no energy!

A big GA for that one. I'll bet Del the Cat is upset he didn't get there first!

Good 'out of the box' thinking... we have, of course, tried this approach...we can only report that the repelling force seems to have been transferred to our cat wrangler,,,who reports an absence of volunteers...

Hi SolarEagle,

I think the others are pussy footing around. The only gravity free bubble I can think of at the moment is the orbiting space station. But if we are looking to formulate an anti gravity field acting against normal gravity, then I think we may need to look at the atomic nuclei, what I am thinking is, what ejects a neutron from an unstable atom core, it does not have an electrical charge, and a neutron star increases gravity, is there an anti gravity force at the core of atoms that can expel particles and photons at high speed. Any thoughts anyone .

Regards JD.

Hi jd, we believe the approach here should be not an effect on matter, but on gravity itself...According to our calculations this would call for an extremely dense field such as that generated by a superconductor, it's the characteristics of the current running through such a conductor that we seek...

"All living things seek to control their own destiny"

There is a current trend in studying the possibility of antigravity through desinertializing the infrastructure of the tensor of vacuum,which may include the refractive index of the Higgs Field of inertial mass.
Although most engineers won't like Uri Geller, the Davis report of the USA Air Force Base Edwards is available on his website

Pr Puthoff, formerly of Stanford University, has written many papers on the subject: read his website on Zero Point Energy for further advice & references.
Pr Sarfatti of the Sommerfeld Institute(read on the web)objects to Puthoff the equivalence principle of inertial mass, gravitationnal active and gravitationnal passive.
I have bought Gravity of Misner, Thorne and Wheeler, and suggest you to have a look at this very interesting teaching course.

Indeed, the most promizing approach to antigravity seems to manipulate the vaccum, for example read Puthoof's "can the vacuum be engineered for spaceflight application)

There may be another way of creating it -

The news of the Hardron collider - there was a lot of rumors (and apprehensions) at least in our part of planets that black holes may be created.

If you put two black holes at a given diatance - then the gravity will cancel each other in the center point (only the rubber will be stretched if the point is more than a point) and it will remain thus forever

Anyway after a certain time they will eat-up each other ( not like europium who ate the guineapig but rather like a quiz we heard - if two snake start eating each other from tail side then in the end which one is left out ?) and either before and after us alsi, but the non-gravity remains

a) No body to measure gravity and hence no gravity.

b) In the black holes where all the physics rule collapses - there can not be gravity

Thinking about the first point there are so many inseen and inmeasured stars and planets - do they have gravity ?

Since we have not seen them (physically or mathematically) so they do not exist

If they do not exist they do not have gravity.

I thing in our backyard best method may be the hardron experiment (When is the next attempt ?)

You are confronted with a very difficult problem since gravity was till now only measured but not totally explained.

Very well, then let us assume, for purposes of discussion, that gravity is a force exerted by dark energy displaced by matter, and that dark energy is composed of atomic materials reduced to their smallest component, a minute particle with an inherent charged field that repels within the field and attracts at the edges so that these particles are tightly bound together and evenly spaced except where displaced by matter around which these particles are compressed, resulting in the force of gravity...To picture the particle size, relate an electron to the size of the moon, the particle size then being the size of a grain of sand in corresponding relation to the moon...

"To picture the particle size, relate an electron to the size of the moon, ..."

To be quite honest, SolarEagle, electrons have no size so far as we can tell. They have charge, mass, spin and a few other attributes, but no size.

More accurately, no definite size has been assigned, except to say above zero. We have assigned an approximation for discussion purposes only, as the post reads...

A particle having an extent (within the limits of measurement), such as a proton, would have been far more appropos for discussion purposes, don't you think?

Furthermore, the size of a subatomic particle is not assigned, it is measured.

"A particle having an extent (within the limits of measurement), such as a proton, would have been far more appropos for discussion purposes, don't you think?"

It's been my experience that when confronted with a problem that seems unsolvable, that some people will argue the details or language involved as though that were the problem, this seems a classic case of such behavior...I believe you have misspelled "apropos"...

"Furthermore, the size of a subatomic particle is not assigned, it is measured."

A value can be assigned to any unknown for theoretical modeling...

To alter the effects of gravity you need to build a time/space warping device. I don't have any blueprints on that device but perhaps we can think our way through the design process.

Since gravity can be simulated by adding energy to some mass, thereby accelerating it and changing its location with respect to time, then just moving an object disrupts all of the gravity links. Of course, those links are re-established at the speed of light as the object occupies a different space and crosses the gravity flux.

Or, since E= Mass * (Speed of Light)² and because we know that mass can be converted to energy, then all we have to do is convert energy to mass. But you will need a rather large power source. Then you could eject the mass but don't pollute or you will certainly be considered environmentally unfriendly.

Then again, accelerating some quantity of anti-matter may very well produce the field you desire, but you would have to constantly ramp up and ramp down the acceleration because we can't exceed the speed of light.....or can we? In any case, decelerating (ramping down) should count as an acceleration in the opposite direction but it may double the normal gravity and cancel out the effect.

Perhaps the reason anti-matter is in such short supply is because it is repelled by gravity. If this is the case then it is your source of anti-gravity so all you need is a quantity of anti-matter that has the same mass as you and your bubble. Obviously you will need a magnetic bottle in a vacuum to keep the anti-matter from interacting with any other matter or your bubble (field) will pop. (Actually it will explode!) So be careful, and for heavens sake make sure you don't have a power interruption to the magnetic bottle.

Finally, from an economical perspective, how expensive could a few loaves of toast and a bit of butter actually be? I think that is what is used for the Space Shuttle but it must be stale because it is hard as tile. Maybe the secret is that the toast must be stale. Well, with all of that food for thought, I've gotten hungry so I must go increase my mass.

So far he aint talkin. But I think he's getting too old to remember. I'll have to drop him in my fountain of youth again.

We have considered the reverse black hole approach, creating mass from dark energy, but it's too pricey...More than building the device we would just like to create the effect...What about ~140kv @ <1mhz through spherical superconductor?

Since we're pulling ad hoc numbers out of thin air, why not pick something more conventional like 9 VDC through a stainless-steel mixing bowl? Or 120 VAC @ 60 Hz through a 100-watt light bulb? Light bulbs are spherical, more or less and, as you know, the shape is of paramount importance. It, too, being ad hoc.

If all else fails, you still can't beat the price!

Gentlemen,

I got a call from Mr. Spock via the dark energy channel ( since he called me I cannot tell how he did it), he was very pleased that at least one human being accepts what was his daily bread in the Enterprise long and adventurous trip. He also said that if the gentleman would be so kind to get in touch with him via the same channel he will give over ALL data and blue prints. Although retired he has full documentation still available.

Don't fall for Spock's scam. First he starts with magnetism, and black holes, and the next thing you know, you have given him a deposit on another hydrogen generator to boost the dilithium crystals. The device is just home built junk. It has to be modified to fit, and produces no improvement.

As a general rule, don't fall for the crap that any of these pointy-eared hobgoblins spew out, especially during Pon Farr, when they try to sell you Vulcan marital aids. Their women are hot, though (not like the planet itself, which is aptly named).

Where was that advice last month, when I needed it?

Spocs first business was selling laser discs, where are they now? Then he was looking for funding for that stupid protomater collection thing, everyone was like you can trust him he's a vulcan. But when the company went belly up and the investors lost their tuniks all he had to say was "well, I am half human." Next thing you know he 'll be trying to sell tribbles.≠ ♥

Dougles Adams said it best

"in order to fly you simply throw your self at the ground and miss. since missing is alway so much easier than hitting your target this should work just fine."

now for Real the secret lies in the search for dark matter, wich does not exist i belive , the dark matter dicrepency is only fouind in high metalic systems with large radio wave emersions much like our own solar system, hasent any one put this together yet,, Radio waves have anti gravitational properties (you heard it here first) we havent learned to measure or under stand, but Tesla said the earth is a giant resinating coil, the frequencys of its gravity feild are out there but i belive they are very small like the micro watts found in/senced in magnatometers. look for these types of energys that we know are coming from the earth for your starting point.

when i visited the coral castle in florida i saw the generator was hooked up to radio tuners i think Ed was onto something ther also research his writing on magnetic fields

personaly i liked the cat and toast method simplicity is always the best answer

You could do search for Tom Beardon or J.L. Naudin they have a large amount of information regarding "free energy" and anti-gravity.

"free energy" is just the energy that Lorenz ignored in his calculations.

There goes the neighborhood.