If you're referring to pneumatic or hydraulic torque tools,
either can be "non-impact". Pneumatic torque wrenches exist whereby the
output torque is controlled by the input air pressure.
Pneumatic torque wrenches are continuous-rotating whereas hydraulic
torque wrenches are, for the most part, ratcheting.
A hydraulic torque wrench delivers much higher torque output
than a pneumatic torque wrench of similar size and weight.
Hydraulic torque wrenches require an external hydraulic pump while
pneumatic torque wrenches can be operated by simply plugging in to a
properly conditioned plant air supply.
Hydraulic torque wrenches are much more robust and forgiving than
pneumatic torque wrenches.
I want to consider the construction of the backhoe loader's "arm". In such a case, what differences (advantages and disadvantages) would exist in using pneumatic pistons in place of hydraulic pistons? I want to create a model of such a thing, using pneumatic pistons instead of the actual hydraulic pistons. I am not a mechanical engineer. If anyone can put this to me simple, I would appreciate it. I understand the basic principle of pneumatic/hydraulic systems which multiply the force by trading them for distance moved - much like other "simple machines".