Previous in Forum: How to Test for Heavy Metal in Toys (Not XRF)   Next in Forum: Honeycomb Cardboard Memory Material
Close
Close
Close
8 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwestern United States
Posts: 843
Good Answers: 76

PPM Mixture Question

02/11/2010 2:25 PM

Sorry guys but it's been a long day and I've been crunching too many numbers and now my mind is just mush

I'm sending two metal working fluid samples out for testing, one is going to have an additive, the other is not.

  • End result desired is a 170ppm mixture of a 2-part solution
  • Final solution has to be 250 ml
  • the smallest quantity I can measure effectively is 1ml

I know the basic guiding statement (1% of 1% of a 100 is 1ppm)

Meaning that 1ml of a 1% solution mixed with 99ml of another solution is 100ppm

What's killing me right now, and it's probably just because I'm overly tired, is my inability to measure below 1ml effectively to get a 170ppm of 250ml.

Can you help a brother out?

Mu brain... it's just not workin' today *smacksforeheadagainstwall*

Thanks,

JavaHead

PS - Have any of you had days like this, where seemingly simple tasks that should not be difficult just are impossible to do?

__________________
Reuters - Investigators found that the recent thread derailment in CR4 was caused by over-weight creatures of lore and request that membership DON'T FEED THE TROLLS.
Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Anonymous Poster
#1

Re: PPM Mixture Question

02/11/2010 2:47 PM

From your long, rambling diatribe I managed to understand that what you want is 170ppm of 250 ml. Is that is so then divide 250 by one million and multiply by 170. So 170ppm of 250 ml is 0.0425 ml. Right???

Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwestern United States
Posts: 843
Good Answers: 76
#2
In reply to #1

Re: PPM Mixture Question

02/11/2010 3:07 PM

Correct but I can't measure that so my 170ppm component will be diluted... let's say into a 1% solution which gives me 4.25 ml. but I can't measure that either... smallest I can measure is 1ml... my goal was to develop a solution % that would permit even ml measurements of both the diluted solution and how much to add to the parent one.

__________________
Reuters - Investigators found that the recent thread derailment in CR4 was caused by over-weight creatures of lore and request that membership DON'T FEED THE TROLLS.
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - Don't Know What Made The Old Title Attractive... Popular Science - Weaponology - New Member United States - US - Statue of Liberty - 60 Year Member

Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Yellowstone Valley, in Big Sky Country
Posts: 7425
Good Answers: 295
#3

Re: PPM Mixture Question

02/11/2010 3:23 PM

I think you are sort of mixing up apples and footballs. Is your submittal sample truly to be 170ml 'A' / 1,000,000ml 'B'? If it is as simple as that, and your accurate measurement is 1ml, then mix 1ml of 'A' with 5,881ml of 'B'. Mix well, then discard all but the required 250ml! Still not exact, but this exercise is already obtuse enough.

I'll ask again: Is your submittal sample truly to be a simple volume mix? I bet it isn't.

__________________
Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
Register to Reply
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwestern United States
Posts: 843
Good Answers: 76
#6
In reply to #3

Re: PPM Mixture Question

02/12/2010 10:04 AM

Actually, it's more like apple juice and nitro glycerin, but that's a whole other thread

Umm, yeah... it's really as simple as that... well, except for the fact that 'A' is hazardous so I really don't feel like generating 6 liters of hazardous waste. But I didn't tell you that upfront so you would not have known.

As for it being obtuse, sorry... I appreciate your input none the less.

JavaHead

__________________
Reuters - Investigators found that the recent thread derailment in CR4 was caused by over-weight creatures of lore and request that membership DON'T FEED THE TROLLS.
Register to Reply
3
Guru
Australia - Member - New Member

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 2181
Good Answers: 255
#4

Re: PPM Mixture Question

02/11/2010 3:57 PM

In my days in the medical faculty, we used to make intermediate solutions from VERY concentrated chemicals so that we could determine end solution concentrations.

Mix 1 ml of "contaminant" into 999ml of clean solvent. You now have a 1,000ppm mixture.

Use 170ml of this contaminant intermediate with 830ml of clean solvent and you then have a 170ppm mixture.

(note that the error in your ability to measure the 1ml initial sample will strongly impact the outcome. Personally, using same principal, I'd go 5ml into 995ml to get a 5,000ppm mix, then use 34 ml of that with 966ml of solvent to get a 1L sample of 170ppm. The induced errors will be much better.)

__________________
Just an Engineer from the land down under.
Register to Reply Good Answer (Score 3)
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwestern United States
Posts: 843
Good Answers: 76
#7
In reply to #4

Re: PPM Mixture Question

02/12/2010 10:05 AM

After my head cleared, took an hour break for dinner, it fell into place... actually your second option was what I scribbled on a napkin while enjoying the last part of my meal. Then I was like... "Duh, way to embarrass yourself by asking stupid questions." Sorry, it was just a bad day and I was burnt out.

As previously mentioned in a different reply, component A is hazardous and the 170ppm is a regulatory limit. We are also a CESQG in regards to hazardous waste so I was trying to generate the least amount of residual solution, of which I would not have been able to justify a use for and would have to count towards my waste generation. Since we're near the upper percentile of our generation limit, we really have to be careful about generating needles amounts.

Thanks again for your reply.

Ya'll have a wonderful weekend now, ya hear?

JavaHead

__________________
Reuters - Investigators found that the recent thread derailment in CR4 was caused by over-weight creatures of lore and request that membership DON'T FEED THE TROLLS.
Register to Reply
Anonymous Poster
#5

Re: PPM Mixture Question

02/12/2010 7:29 AM

Mix one part (ml) of solute (fluid-1) of C1 concentration in Y1 part (ml) of solvent (fluid-2)

Resultant concentration is

C2 = C1 / (Y1+1)

Repeat with Y2 parts of solvent

C3 = C2/(Y2+1) = C1/(y1+1)(y2+1)

And so on

Ie

C4 = C1/(Y1+1)(Y2+1)(Y3+1)

(Note: each time 1 ml of previous stage is mixed with Yn ml of pure solvent)

for your case if I go only to two stage

C3 = C1/(Y1+1)(Y2+1)

Final mixture required is 250 ie Y2+1 = 250

C1=1

C3=170ppm = 0.000170

Y1+1 = 1/ 0.000170*250 = 23.53 ml

Y1 = 22.53 ml

Since your accuracy is 1ml, I will double it ie

2ml of solute in 45ml of solvent this will give you 170.2128ppm solution.

Wastage of solvent is almost 45ml (you have taken only 1ml from the solution of 47ml for second stage) .

If you want to go for further refinement, then may be you should go for higher order mixing

(This is what is done in homeopathy )

Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru
Technical Fields - Project Managers & Project Engineers - New Member

Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Midwestern United States
Posts: 843
Good Answers: 76
#8
In reply to #5

Re: PPM Mixture Question

02/12/2010 10:15 AM

Thanks or the detailed reply. I'd have to tweak it a little going that route simply because I can't show intentional exceedance of 170, it's a regulatory limit.

But, yeah... now that my head is clear and got some decent sleep... finally... I like this method an will employ it in the future.

JavaHead

__________________
Reuters - Investigators found that the recent thread derailment in CR4 was caused by over-weight creatures of lore and request that membership DON'T FEED THE TROLLS.
Register to Reply
Register to Reply 8 comments

Good Answers:

These comments received enough positive votes to make them "good answers".

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (2); Doorman (1); JavaHead (4); Just an Engineer (1)

Previous in Forum: How to Test for Heavy Metal in Toys (Not XRF)   Next in Forum: Honeycomb Cardboard Memory Material

Advertisement