Hi all,
there's a question from crude oil production field, where electrostatic delaters are used to separte water from crude. People from Operations found that using systems like made by Agar Corp. or any kind of short antenna-type probes does force technicians go out to the desalter, open ball valve and manually position the probe to catch the emulsion level (control probe was inserted at 45 deg through ellipse tank end). Trips to desalter were caused by variations in water content and type/amount of chemicals injected into pipe to stimulate water separation from crude. At the end, they have re-installed analog Float Level Gauge with rather long float (say 2800 mm long) and turned to be happy - sitting the whole shift in a warm control room environment is much better then going to deep snows and cold. This has been a compromise to process control, because float gauge will return them error quite soon due to wax sticks onto it. Neverhteless, they are happy, cause such a long float catch up with every little emulsion layer where ever in the desalter it appears.
The quiestion is - can it be replaced with something better in terms of
a) eliminate mechanical parts (like torsion, special rods, hangups etc)
b) be non-sticking or irrelevant to wax build up on a probe.
Process data are basic: horizontal bullet tank 3000 mm diameter and 10-15 m long with heavy transformer on top and electrostatic grid inside. Flange nozzle to put the gauge in is DN150 or DN200 (installed at side chamber mostly). Pressure is slightly above atmospheric and process T is +50....+55 C, injected chemicals. There are more details available.
HART protocol is welcome.
What is about new Magnetrol level gauge and other Magnetrol products ?
Thank you for advices.
Juri.