Previous in Forum: PRENDEV   Next in Forum: Proper/Accepted Notation?
Close
Close
Close
19 comments
Rate Comments: Nested
Participant

Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1

Detecting Underground Water

03/26/2010 4:06 PM

Can you advise me if there is an instrument to detect underground water giving depth of water and strength or amount of water under ground?

an instrument that I can buy for own use or for business...

thank you in advance

Pierre Karam

Register to Reply
Interested in this topic? By joining CR4 you can "subscribe" to
this discussion and receive notification when new comments are added.

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Guru

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wolfe Island, ON
Posts: 1357
Good Answers: 109
#1

Re: environmental engineer

03/26/2010 11:45 PM

Oh for the dream instrument, we only wish. The art of finding water is a quality that is difficult to obtain. We can assume there is water almost anywhere beneath the ground and be mostly correct. I would suggest that well records and the history of water in a particular geographic area would be a primary step. Talk to the people in the area and find out how they get their water and if from the ground how deep what type of well what geology. Survey the land and geology and think about where the water is most likely to be found. Geology maps can point out fractures and the strike of the land. Then you may want to install a test well as BAT (best available technology).

There is a host of geophysical work that can be done at expense and involves resistivity, Xray, thermal imaging, etc but you need a trained operator interpreter with much schooling.

For the snake oil salesman or water witch or dowser all he needs is a good willow stick with a fork. Apple, hickory, and other woods have also been used. The stick is supposed to bend up or down when water streams are encountered. Also Copper wire with 90 degree handles and held parallel to the ground will cross when you pass over that so called pencil stream of water. There are people that swear by these methods but most environmental engineers just swear at the method. Statistical evidence gathered by the National Ground Water Association does not support witching or dowsing as a method of finding water.

A short answer to your question is NO!

__________________
If they want holy water, tell them to boil the hell out of it.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2446
Good Answers: 60
#2
In reply to #1

Re: environmental engineer

03/27/2010 1:36 AM

? Would Ground Penertrating Radar Be Of Use ?

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Red Hook, New York (Mid-Hudson River Valley)
Posts: 4362
Good Answers: 179
#3
In reply to #2

Re: environmental engineer

03/27/2010 9:18 AM

With my experience using GPR in the US Army Reserve, the answer is no concerning locating groundwater, but that was nearly 20 years ago. There may be a new GPR unit that is available and on the market today based on new technical in-roads that could locate groundwater, but I'm not aware of it.

Regarding "water witching". Before 1988 I never believes that it was accurate of even worked, but after what I witnessed one day changed my beliefs. Out the City of Amsterdam NY lies a small hamlet called Vails Mills. A local water well drilling company hired by a couple (my clients) that was building a new home attempted no less than 8 wells and pretty much came up dry on every attempt,except a single well that produced slightly less than 2 1/2 GPM yield. Generally, we're shooting for a sustained well yield of over 5 GPM for a single family residence. Also, many of the homes in the vicinity were getting yields less than required 5 GPM. Next step, the driller called-in and old fellow experienced in water witching for over 50 years. After probing the parcel of land (which as approx. 10 Acres in size) for 1/2 an hour he located what he called a very narrow but high flowing underground stream. Later that same day after the well driller had relocated to that same exact spot, they hit pay-dirt at a depth of approximately 70 feet down! It was like a geyser at Yellow Stone National Park, with the water shooting up out of the new well approximately 80 or more feet into the air. The poor well driller had a hell of a time capping off the well head! Later on, we measured the well yield to be in excess of 1,200 GPM, which was unheard of in that area! To this day I'm astonished at the wells volume. It could supply enough water for the entire hamlet and have some left over.

Later on nearly a decade later when I was the City Engineer of Amsterdam NY I had an older Water Dept. Foreman that could locate any water main in the City with his pair of copper water witching rods. Usually his accuracy was within about 6 inches, plus or minus, and much better then our state of the art electronic leak detector equipment!

That's all for now....just presenting my experiences with Water Witching!

__________________
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"; hendiatris attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar, 47 B.C.
Register to Reply Score 1 for Good Answer
Guru

Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2446
Good Answers: 60
#4
In reply to #3

Re: environmental engineer

03/27/2010 10:04 AM

The wires or sticks apparently work by amplifiying small muscle responses in the neck area i am led to belive

In the UK its also called dowsing

Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Red Hook, New York (Mid-Hudson River Valley)
Posts: 4362
Good Answers: 179
#5

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/27/2010 10:46 AM

Yes Peter, it's called "Dousing" here as well, or "Water Witching"....whatever is one's favorite usage.....

__________________
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"; hendiatris attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar, 47 B.C.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#6

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/27/2010 11:45 PM

You KNOW don't you that there is a million dollars handed to the person who can prove that they can dowse successfully don't you? Hundred of dowsers have tried....and they have all failed.

Anectdotal evidence is the worst form of evidence. That fella you mention is so good, then he should try for the million bucks.

Not that I really care about the dowsers who can or cannot find water, thats just a parlour trick, its the ones who search for bombs I really don't trust. I mean, people aredying from that bogus device.

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Red Hook, New York (Mid-Hudson River Valley)
Posts: 4362
Good Answers: 179
#7
In reply to #6

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/28/2010 8:09 AM

Hello Yusef1,

That guy that I mentioned who was good at locating groundwater can't go after the $1 Million prize. The reason why is that he passed away several years ago. I'm sure if he were alive he's go for it because he was THAT good. And I'm of the opinion that it is not a parlour trick when conducted by the right person......here might be some sort of electrical link present, but who really knows? Has any University ever done Controlled scientific tests/study on Water Witching?

I agree with you on bomb disposal. No one in the there right mind (and with the proper ORD Disposal training by the Army, etc.) would try to locate bombs, unexpended ordinance and IED's with a pair of Water Witching rods. That's plain Suicide in my judgement.......been there, done it during and immediately after Gulf War I when I was a CO of a Reinforced Engineer Company tasked to remove land mines and Booby Traps left by the Iraqi's as they left Kuwait City. In the time between the Cease Fire and when my unit disembarked for CONUS in mid-June of '91, we disposed of nearly 250,000 mines of all types and Booby traps that had been planted by the Iraqis along the Kuwait - Saudia Arabia border and vicinity (including well heads not blown, and at 2 Desalinization plants). No way would I have allowed any of my troop to use divining rods, as he would have killed himself, and probably others!

Have a great sunny day!

__________________
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"; hendiatris attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar, 47 B.C.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#8
In reply to #7

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/28/2010 3:08 PM

James Randi in his book "Flim Flam" said that the water dowsers were the most depressing people to debunk because they were not con artists, but in fact, truly believed that they could do what they claimed to do. That they often felt that an attack on their beliefs was normally equated to an attack on their person, and would leave his testing area in tears and sqealing tires. I know how they feel...when somebody says dowsing works, that is an attack on MY belief system, and my knee jerk reaction is almost always varying degrees of hostility. I am (I think successfully) getting over that attitude though. I now reserve the umbrage towards true flim flam men who are selling false hope at 60 thousand dollars a pop! (this would be US taxpayers dollars being spent so who other than me and anybody who has lost their house due to the mortgage crisis cares?)

You asked, did any University do a controlled study on water dowsing? I am not aware of any, but it sounds like it would make a good first year project. Randi paid for Sandia labs to test the explosives dowsers, and found them to be bogus. Other than paying the bill for the testing, Randi had no involvement, and in fact, is a little miffed that he didn't get the credit for exposing this hoax. It was all done by the National Explosives test establishment at Sandia and Sniffex company representatives. (the links are illuminating)

Randi said that is is a very pernicious form of self delusion, and he has put his money where his mouth is...so I guess he can say what he likes. I dunno....I think that the fact that nobody has yet to claim the million dollar prize is pretty indicative, because there is no lack of people trying! They even get to design their own testing protocol! Money talks and BS walks. But I think if you accept one form of delusion such as wart charming, or water dowsing, then it makes it somehow easier to accept another form of delusion such as explosives detecting. Again, I would not care except that my friends, allies, and the innocents on my watch will reap the results of such dangerous thinking.

I guess you didn't work for Major General Jehad al-Jabiri, the head of the Ministry of the Interior General directorate for combating explosives. Seems he feels they work just fine! Major General Richard Rowe Jr. thinks Major General al-Jabiri is full of horse pucky, and refused to allow his US command to purchase the devices. But where did the Iraquis get the money to purchase them? How many dead US combat engineers because of that evil man and the even more evil Jim McCormick? You should know Capt. Moosie...you were there.

As I said, I reserve my umbrage for the con artists. I rather like dowsers. I especially like combat engineers who kept my airfield safe during the twenty odd years I fixed airplanes for the military. So Capt Moosie is all right in MY book.

Anyway, are we not getting off topic here? Perhaps I should mark it off topic. Oh heck, if anybody thinks this is off topic, they can mark me down....

Regards.

Yusef1

Per Ardua Ad Astra

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
United Kingdom - Member - Old New Member

Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South east U.K.
Posts: 3695
Good Answers: 93
#10
In reply to #6

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/29/2010 4:48 AM

Maybe they only failed because the star signs were wrong at the time!!!

__________________
I didn't have a really important life, but at least it's been funny (Lemmy Kilminster 1945-2015)
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#11
In reply to #10

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/29/2010 9:48 AM

I believe it is related to the "clean window" syndrom. My mom used to say, "nobody sees the clean window, they only see a dirty one". Similarly the people who believe in "head on", "chiropracty", "water witching", "homeopathy", and "bleeding to balance humours" see the very occasional success story, discard the unsucessful examples and build a mountain of anectdotal evidence out of a molehill of evidence.

This does not make the people who get their necks manipulated, or apply head-on to the forehead for headache, or witch for water con men or bad people in any way. They are not! They have developed a world view which suits them, and they will go to their grave exclaiming about the wonderful stories they witnessed of water witches who found stuff that nobody else seems to have been able to find.

Nor is all of it fake. A horse named "clever hans" was able to count. He would stamp his feet. When he could not see a human being though, he somehow lost the ability to count, and it was determined that it was his "reading" of people which enabled him to count and get his treats. Similarly, psychics will get feedback from the people they are doing readings for, and by the means of often unconscious perception, will get good solid, and repeatable results. Police get hunches in much the same way. A salesman I knew once watched people's eyes, and when their pupils dilated, he knew he "had them". I am sure many good salespeople will pick up on that without really noticing exactly what they are picking up on. I presume that a water witcher will see things like the lay of the land, the lush growth of vegetation, and a hundred other factors, and will be able to state correctly that there is water here. Again, it is a perception, a feeling they get which might be manifested with a pendulum or a bent stick but there no magic here...just good common sense at work. (thats is why I tend to like water witches...by and large, they are good solid perceptive people who do not want to defraud anybody.)

This is opposed to the people who are deliberately faking in order to get money. TV psychics, televangelists, some politicians, and the makers of dowsing rods for the purpose of finding explosives. Please note that this does not mean that the people who fall for these fakeries are stupid, or uneducated....in fact, a con man of my aquaintance told me once that it is easier to fool a smart person than a dumb one since the con works better on people who think they can't be fooled. "Well, since I am far too smart to be fooled by a mountebank trick, this MUST be real magic then!". A fine example of this would be to watch a couple of episodes of "psychic kids" or "paranormal experience".

Anyway, Carl Sagan was astounded to discover that more that three times as much was spent on astrology (paying for space in the paper, and so forth) than was spent on actual astronomy. What does THAT tell you!

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru
Hobbies - DIY Welding - New Member Hobbies - Target Shooting - New Member Engineering Fields - Civil Engineering - New Member United States - Member - New Member

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Red Hook, New York (Mid-Hudson River Valley)
Posts: 4362
Good Answers: 179
#13
In reply to #11

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/31/2010 9:20 AM

Sorry Yusef1, I disagree with your stance about Chiropractors. I've been going to some-well chosen Chiropractors that have helped me since I was 14 years old and I'm now 52. There have been many times where I was doubled over with extreme back pain unable to walk or literally move, period. Only a Chiropractor was able to help me by manipulations of my leg. arms, shoulders, neck and the entire spine. Usually, within a few treatments I was able to walk once again. The alternative was going under the knife of a Spinal Surgeon and taking massive amounts of pain killer pills and muscle relaxers! NO WAY!!! NO MD HAS EVER HAD ANY SUCCESS ALLEVIATING THE PAIN AND CORRECTING SKELETON MISALIGNMENTS!

I only go to well establish "old-school" Chiropractors that do not offer the homeopathy crappola like the newer younger Chiropractors do. And these treatments have been for nearly almost my entire life and not some "occasional" happenstance. Without the successful treatments I would have ended up stranded in a wheelchair, paralyzed for the remainder of my life, and most likely a ward of the state. I come a medical family, where my late father was a Dentist for 43 years and my mother is still a licensed RN at age 75. My X-wife's family is nearly all medical, and so is my current wife's family. My X is an OTR, and she has a RN mother, 3 sisters that are RN's a sister that is a PA, and 2 brothers that are MD's One other brother is studying Chiropractics and is in his final year before Residency. My current wife is a RN of 32 years and has served in nearly every nursing capacity there can be, including the ER operating rooms and the standard OR's. Her siblings are a Shrink w/her PhD and is the Dept. Head at the NJ college she teaches at. My wife's brother has a double MS and is a Psychologist and CEO of a drug and alcohol rehab firm that is located nationally and in Canada. I will tell you this, nearly all use and believe in Chiropractics and have done so for some time now.....and all know it isn't a crock either.

I ask you not to make such blanket statements, especially in regard to the practice of Chiropractics. Yusef, don't be so closed-minded, especially if you have never tried it before, and if you had once and had a bad experience then you went to the wrong Doctor. Yes, by law Chiropractors are Licensed and Registered as a Doctor, as in Doctor of Chiropractic Medicine. I for one am glad to have received the expert care of several wonderful and caring Chiropractors over the years, who, by the way, have as much Med Schooling and Residency as their MD cousins.

And whatever your retort is herein it will not influence my decision to continue seeing Chiropractors for treatment, because I know it works for me. Nor will it influence my advice to others that seek such treatment. Enough said!

Signed,

CaptMoosie, BS/BS/MS/MS & PhD

__________________
"Veni, Vidi, Vici"; hendiatris attributed to Gaius Julius Caesar, 47 B.C.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#15
In reply to #13

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/31/2010 5:55 PM

You can disagree with me all you want. I am not a chiropractor. No skin off MY nose. But you should know by now Captain, that I NEVER make a statement without backup. And I never make a cheap retort. Ever. All my retorts are very expensive, that is, I take a good amount of time with them. But, retort or not, I am not proposing to attack you, your belief system, nor do I hold your long and varied experience cheap. If it were your religious position, I would simply nod my head and say "fine". But it is a service, same as the guy who fits me for my shoes, its NOT a religion, even though it seems to be often treated as such. It is created and run by people who put their pants on one leg at a time. Many, perhaps most of them are caring individuals who for some reason didn't want to become physicians specializing in back pain (physiatrists), but instead became back crackers. There may be a lunatic fringe which ruins it for everybody for instance, just as there is in every profession. I am happy that you have found one you trust, and I hope you stick with him (or her) because clearly something is working for you. I do not have that trust, I would rather spend my money on a good massage therapist.

I know, people don't like to follow links. Maybe, after exploring the same links that I have, you will see why I have taken this position which seems so much at variance with your world view that you have risen in righteous umbrage! (insert smile here to to indicate that I take your points seriously, and that I am not really the enemy) I have no hope that I would be able to "convert you back from the dark side", but I offer this "retort" as the reason WHY I hold MY particular world view.

Your experience with chiropracty is positive. Mine is overwhelmingly negative. Anecdotal evidence is, and always has been wildly unreliable. I have stories too, and more bad stories than good ones. But a story does not make a fact, as I have pointed out before. I might share one with you at the end...my own in fact as you have shared yours with me. Thank you.

However, before I make a blanket statement attacking a whole profession, I really did go to the trouble to find out if I had a leg to stand on. Here are some results I have found in the last couple of years. You see, unlike Daniel David Palmer, I don't make this stuff up.

There seems to be quite a controversy about chiropracty. Certainly the medical profession needs to learn how their bedside manner seems to create so many excellent, if short lived results. Most people feel better after they come away from a chiropractor. But then in my view, people feel better upon leaving church, the beer tent, and the bordello, but that doesn't make the people that run these fine institutions into medical practitioners. So I would have to look deeper into what is going on besides the simple "make it feel better". Unfortunately, the more you look into it, the less scientific it seems to get. It makes one wonder just why a chiropractor can not quite seem to "fix" anything. (job security?) Far from the medical profession being on board with it, The Canadian Paediatric Association, for instance, doesn't think it is good for kids. Everybody who is involved with Chiropracty is willing to admit that there is "something to it", but it is not as recognized as a legitimate medical sub-specialty like, say Podiatry. And it won't be until they clean up their philosophy, essentially clean up their act. Its not me saying this, this link is an open letter written from within their own profession.

So, like any statement I make, I can back it up. But hey, I'm nobody special. Not a medical guy, not a new age guy, not a conservative or a liberal, I'm just a guy. A guy that can read. And chooses my sources carefully. Lets hear it from the back benders themselves....

Relax Cap'n, I'm not the enemy here! Did you actually see a physiatrist? (no, not a psychiatrist, a physiatrist! The skeleton specialist guy!) The Medical Centre here in Ottawa fixed me up pretty good once I got around to seeing the right specialist. The chiropractor, working from x-rays said it was a skeleton misalignment and kept twisting my toes. The physiatrist (specialist in skeletal disorders) noted that it was a series of green stick fractures in the foot bones, caused by heavy packs and route marches. They splinted them as best they could (can't do much with feet) and made a shoe insert. I was standing parades within a month. Your mileage may differ, but I am okay with that. So yeah, I have never missed a chance to call a spade a spade, and get even for the months of agony that quack put me through.

Allow me to congratulate you on one particular outstanding statement, that homeopathy is crappola! Yes. yes it is. Could not say it better myself.

Regards,

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Guru

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wolfe Island, ON
Posts: 1357
Good Answers: 109
#9

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/28/2010 5:49 PM

I did not think I would weigh back into the discussion on water witching but I think the water witches undermines the science and study that has gone into the hydrogeological cycle and the occurence of ground water. The Official stance by the NGWA is summed as follows:

"The National Ground Water Association strongly opposes the use of water witches to locate groundwater on the grounds that controlled experimental evidence clearly indicates that the technique is totally without scientific merit. The Association recommends the use of proven hydrogeological and geophysical techniques for groundwater reconnaissance when its presence is not easily recognizable by drilling contractors."

I have been involved in the ground water industry for greater than 40 years and I do believe I have seen every type of witching and the ardent followers of it. For every anecdotal story there is always another real story that could show the opposite. The one I remember most is in the Village of Delta Ontario that hired a reknowned witcher to come up from Pennsylvania to locate water in a nearby park. The park is bordered by lakes on two sides. One side has jointed sandstone underlying flat fields; whereas,the other lake is rimmed by a ridge of exposed anhydrite, a metamorphic form of gypsum found in white crystal form. The well to service this park was witched on this ridge. If you even had a cursory knowledge of hydrogeology, you would know the most likely location to find water was in the sandstone. Well records available for public viewing also indicated this fact. After 2 wells were drilled in the anhydrite I was asked to comment by park staff. I won't say what I said about the witchers but a subsequent well in sandstone proved well over 100 gpm. The anhydrite formation is not the best location for wells. The water found in this formation is often very high in sulfate that could render the water unfit for use.

I would encourage that you explore www.nwga.org

__________________
If they want holy water, tell them to boil the hell out of it.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where the sun sets on OZ
Posts: 1381
Good Answers: 28
#12

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/31/2010 7:46 AM

Try bending two welding rods at 90 deg. about 10cm from an end. Hold these horizontal with bent portion vertical and go for a walk.

I did this on my own 1 acre property and to my amazement the rods crossed at a point where the driller found water. To be fair, when the driller came he said that there would be a stream 'here' and indicated a line down the side of my property. It was when i crossed this line that the two rods crossed. I do not consider myself a douser nor would i suggest to someone that i could find water for them. In fact when i tried to duplicate the result to show the driller what i could do, the "magic" was gone. I had always thought that an unconscious movement of the hands whilst the douser was walking led the rods to cross and as water can usually be found not too far down their belief in their ability was boosted. Buuuut, in my case the rods could not be restrained or redirected without concerted effort. I tried to uncross them because i am naturally a sceptic and a great fan of Randi. And also because the rods crossed themselves with force. I was holding them loosely so that they could move freely but the force was strong so i gripped them tight and tried to swing them apart and couldn't, without' as i said, some effort. I can only say to disbelievers 'try it'. You only need to waste two welding rods.

__________________
Where's the KaBoom? There should be a KaBoom!
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wolfe Island, ON
Posts: 1357
Good Answers: 109
#14
In reply to #12

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/31/2010 10:27 AM

If a witcher can find water, then ask the opposite; "Can you show me on the lot where there is no water?" We have asked this very question and we get the usual response of; "well water may exist where it does not respond but water will be where it does". The National Ground Water Association has taken witchers to task several times under scientific controls and each time they could find no evidence of positive results. I do not want to speculate why the rods move but water does not usually move through the ground in "streams" or "rivers" or "lakes" or in "veins". Unconfined aquifers occur when the aquifer is subjected to normal atmospheric pressure and there is no artesian pressure. It is generally found in unconsolidated formations like sand or gravel. It will also occur in some shale formations. Confined aquifers are aquifers contained in overlying and underlying impervious layers (crude definition) and are generally under artesian pressure. Chances are when the rods moved and if you drilled a well on the location witched you would find water. The same would likely be true where no witching has been done, you will find water. The only real use I had for the witcher was that if he showed the client where to drill, I did not have to take responsibility for the location. A smart well driller would occasionally pseudo-witch (because the owner insisted) with a view to overhead wires and trees and pick a spot easy to set up the rig.

I have seen witchers just witch on a plot map without going in the field...Abracadabra..aaarrrggghhh! They witch for bodies in lake bottoms where an accident has occurred or bodies in cemeteries, or underground wires. It seems to me that its not just water the moves the rods but the dark forces of the universe. Grrrr.

__________________
If they want holy water, tell them to boil the hell out of it.
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where the sun sets on OZ
Posts: 1381
Good Answers: 28
#19
In reply to #14

Re: Detecting Underground Water

07/13/2014 10:56 PM

I can't say enough; I agree totally with you!

When I did this for myself it was an undeniable result, but as I said I could not replicate it. This would make reliability a real issue, BUT for the price of two welding rods it is worth the walk. I say again, the force was strong, not imagined or stoppable!

For what it is worth the ground I live on is at the base of eroded granite mountains that are now mere molehills. There are clay quarries all around me and when we drilled, the first 15m of spoil was all clay then we hit coarse river sand. Perhaps an ancient river bed that ran along the ( current ) foothills into the main river ( presently 1 Km away ).

I have tried dowsing this same spot since and got no response. I see dowsing as so unreliable as to be useless BUT still worth a try.

Jim

__________________
Where's the KaBoom? There should be a KaBoom!
Register to Reply
Guru

Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 1975
Good Answers: 117
#16
In reply to #12

Re: Detecting Underground Water

03/31/2010 5:58 PM

Makes ya wonder don't it?

__________________
If it was easy anybody could do it.
Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Anonymous Poster
#17

Re: Detecting Underground Water

06/15/2010 4:50 AM

dear friend,

good afternoon, i do't know ,the name of the underground water detection instrument ,please tell about the name ,company,instrument,cost ,etcsend the details to my mail;saravana3061987@gmail.com. thanking you

Register to Reply Off Topic (Score 5)
Commentator

Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Abu Dhabi - United Arab Emirates
Posts: 56
#18

Re: Detecting Underground Water

07/08/2014 1:51 AM

Q. Is there any device that can tell where the suitable underground water for irregation??

.. I am willing to drill for a well but I want to save time and locate where the most suitable water is ...

Register to Reply
Register to Reply 19 comments

"Almost" Good Answers:

Check out these comments that don't yet have enough votes to be "official" good answers and, if you agree with them, vote them!
Copy to Clipboard

Users who posted comments:

Anonymous Poster (1); CaptMoosie (4); Conan21 (1); JIMRAT (2); kevinm (3); Nigh (1); peterg7lyq (2); Yusef1 (5)

Previous in Forum: PRENDEV   Next in Forum: Proper/Accepted Notation?

Advertisement